Ozymandias vs. Winter Soldier (h2h)

Started by quanchi112150 pages

Originally posted by h1a8
If two fighters were at the same speed but one had bullet time perceptions then that fighter could easily avoid the other fighters attacks and thus win the fight.
False. We don't rely on one feat and ignore how they react in a fistfight. You're ignoring everything else in favor out one feat. You do this all the time and it's why no one takes you seriously.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Seems you have a very loose definition of what a lie actually is.

Moron, that is YOUR definition. Are you too stupid to even realize that. You've called me a liar 3 times now in a few days because I MISREPRESENTED what you were saying. So you called me a liar. Silent does the same thing to me over and over... yet I have a loose definition of a lie? WTF LMAO. that is YOUR definition clownshoes. So I'll ask AGAIN

Where was Captain Save a Froth when Silent continually misrepresents what I say? That isn't lying by your definition?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Why would I agree to a wager where only you benefit. If you find proof you get me temp banned but if you don't... nothing happens?

How bout for every proof of "lying" you find for me I find proof of you lying and whoever runs out of proof first gets temp banned?

Or you could just find and post your proof, make me look stupid in front of other people. That's what I would have done if I were in your shoes.

Of course it wouldn't be just one sided. If I couldn't produce it, then I would get banned. Shoot, even thinking about it briefly I even know exactly what you claimed you never said but did. You originally agreed with me and said Ozy has done better against peak human skill level guys than Cap or WS. Then later when I brought up this point in my arguments... you go... I never said that, I never said Ozy did better. Pages go on with me saying you did, and just admit it. You refuse. I quote you saying it, and you go, yeah I did, but I changed my mind now LOL

Originally posted by FrothByte
See there you go making stuff up again. When have I ever said that such a thing was a lie?

You're blatantly retarded, and I'm started to truly feel bad for you. You can't even remember what you say, even when it was just yesterday. It's truly pitiful the level of intelligence you display sometimes. Here are 3 quotes I found from you just yesterday

Originally posted by FrothByte
I assume you meant to type "wouldn't land a thing", in which case I caught you in a lie again. I never said they wouldn't have landed a hit. Please quote me where I said that.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So you're still not going to admit that you got caught in a lie?

]
Originally posted by FrothByte
I obsess with this because it is not the first time this happened. In fact, you do it every few posts. You take what someone said, change it's meaning to suit you, then act like it's fact that the other user said it that way.

So it's useless to debate with you if you have no integrity. Because whatever points someone else raises you'll simply change what they said, lie about the meaning, and convince yourself you're actually winning. Just look at how many posts it took before you actually admitted that you were mistaken.

Which all stemmed from you saying I misrepresented what you said. yet in the above. You claim you never said that. It's just sad now at this point. I feel like I'm picking on a special ed student.

So I'll ask one more time, and let's see if you're honest. By your definition did Silent lie but misrepresenting what I said? True or false?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You're blatantly retarded, and I'm started to truly feel bad for you. You can't even remember what you say, even when it was just yesterday. It's truly pitiful the level of intelligence you display sometimes. Here are 3 quotes I found from you just yesterday

]

Which all stemmed from you saying I misrepresented what you said. yet in the above. You claim you never said that. It's just sad now at this point. I feel like I'm picking on a special ed student.

So I'll ask one more time, and let's see if you're honest. By your definition did Silent lie but misrepresenting what I said? True or false?

False. What you did and what Silent did were very different. You took what I had previously said, changed the words so that the meaning matched your stance, then claimed that's what I said.

What Silent did was simply assume that since you failed to post quotes of what you claimed that meant you failed to find them.

See the difference?

Another quick example of Froth Misrepresenting what I say. Very CLEARLY I say I'm not just going to go find quotes for nothing, there needs to be a wager on it. VERY CLEAR and then afterwards, you come back with your next quoting misrepresenting what I said. I never said I just would do that, I made it clear I would only do so if something was involved. Another lie froth?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Hell to the no, I'm not going to waste my time finding these quotes for nothing unless there is something involved for it. In fact, in some of the quotes I could reference I SPECIFICALLY note that this is the last time I'm going to go back and quote something you KNOW you said. Now you're asking to go find these quotes again LOL.

Again it's lying. The lying doesn't come in because you changed your argument clownshoes. IS English your first language? Never said that. The LYING comes in when I specifically say you said something.. and you DENY that you said that. I don't care if you change your mind, in fact, I said the correct answer would be... Yes I did say that, but I've now changed my opinion. You're right, changing your mind isn't a bad thing, but denying you said something you did, is lying.


Originally posted by FrothByte
I thought you were supposed to post some form of proof of me lying?

Further lies about Silent. I made it clear I hadn't even looked yet, Silent said I couldn't find them. THAT is HIM MISREPRESENTING what I said to suit HIS argument i.e. that I couldn't find them. Just earlier I ASSUMED you meant that Ozy wouldn't be hit, turns out you didn't mean that. You called me a liar for assuming that is what you meant. Yet somehow here, in the same situation, you're not calling Silent one? BWAHAHA the hypocrisy continues.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Another quick example of Froth Misrepresenting what I say. Very CLEARLY I say I'm not just going to go find quotes for nothing, there needs to be a wager on it. VERY CLEAR and then afterwards, you come back with your next quoting misrepresenting what I said. I never said I just would do that, I made it clear I would only do so if something was involved. Another lie froth?

Further lies about Silent. I made it clear I hadn't even looked yet, Silent said I couldn't find them. THAT is HIM MISREPRESENTING what I said to suit HIS argument i.e. that I couldn't find them. Just earlier I ASSUMED you meant that Ozy wouldn't be hit, turns out you didn't mean that. You called me a liar for assuming that is what you meant. Yet somehow here, in the same situation, you're not calling Silent one? BWAHAHA the hypocrisy continues.

Apparently in your imaginary world, questioning someone and disagreeing with someone is considered "misrepresenting" and "lying".

lol.

What you did was take what I said, changed the wording, and claimed that's what I said. What me and Silent are doing is simply questioning you and your integrity and accusing you of dodging posting proof because you can't find it.

More lies from Froth. There's is no need to QUESTION something when I made my STANCE CLEAR. Did I not say I wouldn't be posting anything for nothing. I clearly did, and quoted myself doing so. You come back and say, I thought you were going to post the quotes. Ummm clearly you misrepresented what I said, since I CLEARLY said I wouldn't be doing it for nothing. Hypocrisy 101 on display here. Truly sad.

Further, have you ever used the term concession accepted, when the other side didn't actual concede. Have you ever done that?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
More lies from Froth. There's is no need to QUESTION something when I made my STANCE CLEAR. Did I not say I wouldn't be posting anything for nothing. I clearly did, and quoted myself doing so. You come back and say, I thought you were going to post the quotes. Ummm clearly you misrepresented what I said, since I CLEARLY said I wouldn't be doing it for nothing. Hypocrisy 101 on display here. Truly sad.

Further, have you ever used the term concession accepted, when the other side didn't actual concede. Have you ever done that?

I don't recall using the words concession accepted with anyone. I also noticed how you sidestepped my challenge to post proof of me lying everytime I post proof of you lying.

But then again since you've shown that you have a very loose definition of the word lie then I don't think I could trust you in this.

You're an clown. Nothing else needs to be said here. You can't even "remember" using that term. You have. Another thing Froth doesn't "remember" using.... RIGHT... Then you say, my definition.. you moron, that is YOUR criteria I'm using to define lying. So, I guess you don't even agree with yourself, not surprising.

Your challenge is a joke, and if you want me to make you look even dumber on how it's a joke, then I'll spell it out for you. Didn't think it was needed though. Seemed obvious.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You're an clown. Nothing else needs to be said here. You can't even "remember" using that term. You have. Another thing Froth doesn't "remember" using.... RIGHT... Then you say, my definition.. you moron, that is YOUR criteria I'm using to define lying. So, I guess you don't even agree with yourself, not surprising.

Your challenge is a joke, and if you want me to make you look even dumber on how it's a joke, then I'll spell it out for you. Didn't think it was needed though. Seemed obvious.

Hey of you claim I did it then all you need to do is post proof. Bet you can't provide proof of me saying that. This is why nobody takes you seriously. You're quick to accuse and are unable to back it up.

If you think I can't prove it, then all you need to do is step up and take the challenge. You won't though, I already know that. I even gave you the specific example of when you did, which let me guess "You don't remember" AMIRITE?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
If you think I can't prove it, then all you need to do is step up and take the challenge. You won't though, I already know that. I even gave you the specific example of when you did, which let me guess "You don't remember" AMIRITE?

Nice try KT. You want me to accept an unfair challenge. I challenged you properly: post an instance where you think I lied and I'll post one from you. You didn't accept. You only want a challenge where I'm the only one put on a spotlight and you can steer eyes away from your lies.

PS you never gave specific examples of anything. All you did was spew more lies.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Moron, that is YOUR definition. Are you too stupid to even realize that. You've called me a liar 3 times now in a few days because I MISREPRESENTED what you were saying. So you called me a liar. Silent does the same thing to me over and over... yet I have a loose definition of a lie? WTF LMAO. that is YOUR definition clownshoes. So I'll ask AGAIN

Where was Captain Save a Froth when Silent continually misrepresents what I say? That isn't lying by your definition?

Meltdown.

😂 💃 😂

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You're an clown. Nothing else needs to be said here. You can't even "remember" using that term. You have. Another thing Froth doesn't "remember" using.... RIGHT... Then you say, my definition.. you moron, that is YOUR criteria I'm using to define lying. So, I guess you don't even agree with yourself, not surprising.

Your challenge is a joke, and if you want me to make you look even dumber on how it's a joke, then I'll spell it out for you. Didn't think it was needed though. Seemed obvious.

Kt: You're an clown.

Idiot, it's you're a clown. You're an idiot.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Of course it wouldn't be just one sided. If I couldn't produce it, then I would get banned. Shoot, even thinking about it briefly I even know exactly what you claimed you never said but did. You originally agreed with me and said Ozy has done better against peak human skill level guys than Cap or WS. Then later when I brought up this point in my arguments... you go... I never said that, I never said Ozy did better. Pages go on with me saying you did, and just admit it. You refuse. I quote you saying it, and you go, yeah I did, but I changed my mind now LOL
Originally posted by FrothByte
Nice try KT. You want me to accept an unfair challenge. I challenged you properly: post an instance where you think I lied and I'll post one from you. You didn't accept. You only want a challenge where I'm the only one put on a spotlight and you can steer eyes away from your lies.

PS you never gave specific examples of anything. All you did was spew more lies.

More lies according to the definition of Froth. You said I never gave a specific example of when you lied? I did in the above, yet you turn around and say I never gave a specific example, even when it's a few posts above lol

I already told you why your challenge is lame. You don't realize why your challenge is retarded do you? Think about it, almost every post of yours I think you are misrepresenting what I'm saying or just being blatantly retarded. We go back and forth on so many issues showcasing that point. I don't just think you do, you clearly think I do as well. So the first issue is, this is common knowledge, I think you either have a reading comprehension issue or purposely misrepresent what I say. How many times am I like I didn't say that.. or that isn't what we're talking about.. how many times do you say the same? See where this is going. That is just the first issue.

Second, and even bigger reason why it's retarded is because it's so subjective to each of us. You'll just ay no, I didn't misrepresent you, when I think you did, and vice versa. Now is it becoming clear? Jesus. Think about it, not a page ago, I clearly feel you misrepresented what I said. I said very clearly I wouldn't do something else something was on the line. You came back and acted like I said I would just post something. I made it clear I wouldn't. Understand now? You said you didn't, it clearly is. Every single thing I bring up you'll say no, and vice versa.

I hate having to hold your hand through these discussions. I thought the above was obvious.

Kt: You're an clown.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
More lies according to the definition of Froth. You said I never gave a specific example of when you lied? I did in the above, yet you turn around and say I never gave a specific example, even when it's a few posts above lol

I already told you why your challenge is lame. You don't realize why your challenge is retarded do you? Think about it, almost every post of yours I think you are misrepresenting what I'm saying or just being blatantly retarded. We go back and forth on so many issues showcasing that point. I don't just think you do, you clearly think I do as well. So the first issue is, this is common knowledge, I think you either have a reading comprehension issue or purposely misrepresent what I say. How many times am I like I didn't say that.. or that isn't what we're talking about.. how many times do you say the same? See where this is going. That is just the first issue.

Second, and even bigger reason why it's retarded is because it's so subjective to each of us. You'll just ay no, I didn't misrepresent you, when I think you did, and vice versa. Now is it becoming clear? Jesus. Think about it, not a page ago, I clearly feel you misrepresented what I said. I said very clearly I wouldn't do something else something was on the line. You came back and acted like I said I would just post something. I made it clear I wouldn't. Understand now? You said you didn't, it clearly is. Every single thing I bring up you'll say no, and vice versa.

I hate having to hold your hand through these discussions. I thought the above was obvious.

Sigh. Either post a quote or just drop the entire issue. You nag more than 20 mother in laws. Look. Are you going to quote me directly or are you going to just continue accusing me without providing proof?

Because if not, then let's just drop it and get back on topic.

Calling it now. Kt is going to back down.

Originally posted by quanchi112
False. We don't rely on one feat and ignore how they react in a fistfight. You're ignoring everything else in favor out one feat. You do this all the time and it's why no one takes you seriously.

But there are no contradictions to the feat. Thus it's Ozy's ability to see in bullet time.