Thor vs Doomsday

Originally posted by Psychotron
It depowered him and there was no sunlight to repower him. 2+2 =?

So you think a guy who can survive a nuke and crashed through a mountain is going to be hurt by an oil rig. Quan pls.

I'm illiterate? So you answered this " what difference does it make if Doomsday tanked or absorbed the nuke? Either way that proves he can eat nuke+ level damage easily. Thor doesn't have anything in his arsenal powerful enough to hurt him." Where?

So don't like it, thus cry it doesn't count

4th time now, if he absorbed the energy... He didn't tank it. Are you dense?

Thor vaporized a city ground and all, DD's best feat was destroying part of an abandoned harbor, but the metal remained and Batman survived hiding in rubble. Can't explain it more plainly than that.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
so in your opinion where is all the stone, and buildings and steel above Tony after Thor hit it?

Again, you not understanding a feat doesn't make it any better than it really is.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Where in the movies was it stated he needed Sunlight to heal K-nite damage. He started naturally healing vs Batman... Then he shot him again.

So don't like it, thus cry it doesn't count

4th time now, if he absorbed the energy... He didn't tank it. Are you dense?

Thor vaporized a city ground and all, DD's best feat was destroying part of an abandoned harbor, but the metal remained and Batman survived hiding in rubble. Can't explain it more plainly than that.

Yeah, and he didn't heal again for a long time. Kryptonite is literally poison to Kryptonians, while sunlight feeds them. Without sunlight Superman's powers weren't at 100%.

It doesn't count because he was in the water with his eyes open having a flashback, dumbo.

So. What. If he can absorb something as powerful as a nuke then he can absorb Thor's puny attacks.

Haha wow. Thor didn't pull of that feat alone and you know it. Doomsday's best feat is casually overpowering Superman, whose's strength feats blow Thor out of the water.

Originally posted by Psychotron
You must have missed him squirming away with some retarded shit about Kurse and Hulk being more experienced. Lol.

Actually have him on Ignore. But not surprising. That's why I stopped "debating" him, because he doesn't debate, he just Trolls like that. And it was just ruining threads we were both in.

I saw the movie yesterday. Based on the movie Doomsday destroys thor. More destructive, more imposing, faster. Doomsday will give Thor the Kurse treatment, but faster and worse.
edit - Who thinks Thor will win here. He stayed with the damaged face after Kurse throwing him a boulder with 100 tons or less, Doomsday was destroying the city after expelling internal energy as collateral effects.
It`s not a fight, it is nearly a stomp in Doomsday favor.

Doomsday could probably solo the Avengers. Thor loses horribly

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Where in the movies was it stated he needed Sunlight to heal K-nite damage. He started naturally healing vs Batman... Then he shot him again.

So don't like it, thus cry it doesn't count

4th time now, if he absorbed the energy... He didn't tank it. Are you dense?

Thor vaporized a city ground and all, DD's best feat was destroying part of an abandoned harbor, but the metal remained and Batman survived hiding in rubble. Can't explain it more plainly than that.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym

So don't like it, thus cry it doesn't count

Was before he started his training and ever had any direct exposure to Sunlight in space.

It's also unclear that he was KO'd. But he was straining, so clearly became infinitely stronger later.

I'm all for arguments for Thor, but don't lowball in the process.

Can somebody explain to me how Superman getting KO'd and almost dying from a Nuke is impressive? All I heard for years was how the WE was such an uber feat. I even heard people DIRECTLY stating that the forces being exerted on Superman during the WE feat were vastly greater than any nuke.

Then I hear how Superman resisting the "blackhole" was such a crazy feat not to be ripped apart. IF true (I don't agree), that would be exponentially more force on his body than a mere nuke.

Yet, when he's KO'd by the NUke and almost dies.. and DD is also stunned by it... OMG it's such a great feat. It's absurd. Considering what other people made Superman's prior feats out to be, this is a low showing, yet it's being totted like a high showing.

What's worse, DD absorbing most of the energy from the blast is still somehow a durability feat. WTF. That's like saying Shaw had crazy durability to survive the grenade or rocket launcher blast. Umm No, he absorbed the energy and minimized most of the effects. Hence why he wasn't sent flying or barely even moved. All the energy was absorbed. Yet here, DD had a crazy durability feat, even though he absorbed the energy LOL. Right.....

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Where in the movies was it stated he needed Sunlight to heal K-nite damage. He started naturally healing vs Batman... Then he shot him again.

So don't like it, thus cry it doesn't count

4th time now, if he absorbed the energy... He didn't tank it. Are you dense?

Thor vaporized a city ground and all, DD's best feat was destroying part of an abandoned harbor, but the metal remained and Batman survived hiding in rubble. Can't explain it more plainly than that.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
The movie stated that Doomsday fed on energy and that they were making him stronger.

I just don't understand how Lex sharing his AIDs with Zods corpse creates Doomsday but whatever.

And Superman wasn't just knocked out, he was on the verge of death but direct sunlight revived him. Snyder explained that.

DC fans are salty this movie stunk and Doomsday would get destroyed by Thor or Hulk.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Can somebody explain to me how Superman getting KO'd and almost dying from a Nuke is impressive? All I heard for years was how the WE was such an uber feat. I even heard people DIRECTLY stating that the forces being exerted on Superman during the WE feat were vastly greater than any nuke.

Then I hear how Superman resisting the "blackhole" was such a crazy feat not to be ripped apart. IF true (I don't agree), that would be exponentially more force on his body than a mere nuke.

Yet, when he's KO'd by the NUke and almost dies.. and DD is also stunned by it... OMG it's such a great feat. It's absurd. Considering what other people made Superman's prior feats out to be, this is a low showing, yet it's being totted like a high showing.

What's worse, DD absorbing most of the energy from the blast is still somehow a durability feat. WTF. That's like saying Shaw had crazy durability to survive the grenade or rocket launcher blast. Umm No, he absorbed the energy and minimized most of the effects. Hence why he wasn't sent flying or barely even moved. All the energy was absorbed. Yet here, DD had a crazy durability feat, even though he absorbed the energy LOL. Right.....

You can't be serious. Surviving a nuke and being Ko'd is a low showing now? There is not a single character (besdies godzilla) to date that has been shown to survive a nuke, KO or not.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You can't be serious. Surviving a nuke and being Ko'd is a low showing now? There is not a single character (besdies godzilla) to date that has been shown to survive a nuke, KO or not.

Did you see what I typed prior?

How can people claim the forces superman resisted flying the W.E. were exponential...

Then turn say the forces he resisted when flying away from the blackhole, were again, exponentially stronger than a mere nuke.

SOOOOO, the question is... how can people claim the above... and it not be a low showing? One of two things is going on here:

1. Either the previous feats in question weren't what they were made out to be (which is exactly what I've been saying), since you know, he was KO'd by far inferior forces

2. If the other feats are as uber as people claimed, well then, this certainly isn't a high showing by any means.

What it can't be is:

1. An awesome durability feat, unless, unless, the prior incidents weren't greatly exaggerated to begin with

Surviving the world engine is completely different then taking a nuke to the face man. People here including you most likely said the WE was not as strong as a nuke because the damage was done over a period of time.

Lets stop the nonsense and have a rational debate bro. Everyone is going to try and low ball this nuke feat, its not going to happen man, why even try?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You can't be serious. Surviving a nuke and being Ko'd is a low showing now?

Preach it

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You can't be serious. Surviving a nuke and being Ko'd is a low showing now? There is not a single character (besdies godzilla) to date that has been shown to survive a nuke, KO or not.

Does Wolverine count?

No offense to anyone particular but this place has really gone full retard with low balling these insane feats now.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Does Wolverine count?

He didn't take it to the face, he was in a hole miles away from impact and that nuke which was the first one ever made was nothing compared to what hit Superman.

It's mostly Quan with the DC lowballing.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He didn't take it to the face, he was in a hole miles away from impact and that nuke which was the first one ever made was nothing compared to what hit Superman.

I agree lol. He just caught enougg of the blest to roast his skin. Indiana Jones is the only one to survive a close encounter lol