Thor vs Doomsday

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Concession accepted

Originally posted by Estacado
Doomsday works Thor faster then Ultron did.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Thor merely destroyed the gravity device that was keeping such a big landmass together.

We don't know how much of it Thor would have been able to destroy on his own, and attributing the entirety of the feat to Thor is silly.

>The rest of the land mass is mostly vaporized, even if you want to assume the vibranium amped that feat 2x fold it's still an insane feat. Also Thor was then hit by the reverberations of said blast and was fine.

Doomsday without any trouble.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
I think you are missing the most important point > Tony was underneath it and we know Tony was because he dodged the rod on its way down.

>The rest of the land mass is mostly vaporized, even if you want to assume the vibranium amped that feat 2x fold it's still an insane feat. Also Thor was then hit by the reverberations of said blast and was fine.

Not enough to warrant him a win here, though.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Only legit thing about your opinion is the durability part, I give you that.

Not enough to warrant him a win here, though.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk is greater than Doomsday and Kurse is more skilled and also greater than Doomsday. He was only born moments ago. No real experience, kiddo.

Prove that Hulk and Kurse are greater than DD. What strength feats do they have that are better than manhandling Superman, and what durability feats do they have that are superior to laughing off a nuke and re-entry?

DD amped off a nuke. It's like saying I have better durability than a Dog because I can eat chocolate.

The Nuke still hit him and he survived and absorbed it after it impacted him.

Not hard to figure out.

Ok? It amped him.

Chocolate analogy stands, it may kill the toughest pit bull but I'm just eating it.

And him being amped is relevant how? He still survived it prior to being amplified, unless you have proof otherwise.

Thor gets annhilated

So he amped off nothing? Good reach lol

Why is his amp relevant to him having survived the initial strike?

Because if he amped off it, it didn't hurt him...

If he didn't amp off it, he amped off nothing.

facepalm

That doesn't change the fact that the blast did **** all prior to the energy being absorbed.

But keep moving goalposts 👆

This is stupid. Superman survived the nuke and Doomsday is >> Superman physically. The movie mate it pretty damn obvious.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Here's your debate:

If Thor can casually win by placing the hammer on someone, why didn't he do it to Hulk or Kurse?

You have the Troll by the nuts. Either he must accept that his argument for Thor taking Doomsday is idiotic, or he has to accept Thor would stomp Hulk the same way.

Either way, you win 👆

Originally posted by carthage
facepalm

That doesn't change the fact that the blast did **** all prior to the energy being absorbed.

But keep moving goalposts 👆

It's like using a sun dip as a durability feat for comic superman.
Not sure what you don't understand.

Originally posted by Psychotron
This is stupid. Superman survived the nuke and Doomsday is >> Superman physically. The movie mate it pretty damn obvious.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You have the Troll by the nuts. Either he must accept that his argument for Thor taking Doomsday is idiotic, or he has to accept Thor would stomp Hulk the same way.

Either way, you win 👆

You must have missed him squirming away with some retarded shit about Kurse and Hulk being more experienced. Lol.