Well Mjolnir can absorb all DD's HV. Unfortunately the movies haven't properly portrayed that ability, including the way he can store that energy and fire it all back, magnified in power.
Also it's good Quanchi brought up the point on page 1 about Thor just laying Mjolnir on Doomsday without DD being able to do anything about it. Because he's pretty much confirming there that Thor can stomp Hulk anytime.
Originally posted by Darth ThorSave he didn't do that to the Hulk. We had a fight in which he didn't look so hot. Quit ignoring the evidence.
Well Mjolnir can absorb all DD's HV. Unfortunately the movies haven't properly portrayed that ability, including the way he can store that energy and fire it all back, magnified in power.Also it's good Quanchi brought up the point on page 1 about Thor just laying Mjolnir on Doomsday without DD being able to do anything about it. Because he's pretty much confirming there that Thor can stomp Hulk anytime.
Originally posted by Adam GrimesDid you not see Avengers 2? It's fairly self evident that a city was floating, Ironman was under it as it fell. Thor hit it and we only see small rocks and the vibranium rod...
In fact, you should provide evidence of your claims.
If Thor didn't destroy the city, why didn't it fall on Tony?
Originally posted by Henry_PymThor merely destroyed the gravity device that was keeping such a big landmass together.
Did you not see Avengers 2? It's fairly self evident that a city was floating, Ironman was under it as it fell. Thor hit it and we only see small rocks and the vibranium rod...If Thor didn't destroy the city, why didn't it fall on Tony?
We don't know how much of it Thor would have been able to destroy on his own, and attributing the entirety of the feat to Thor is silly.
Originally posted by quanchi112That's exactly how it works. Unless you can prove otherwise then WW was that strong and his sword that sharp. Unlike you.
That isn't how it works. WW shows up and cuts off a limb. Pretty bad showing for this villain who didn't seem to last long. Oh yeah Superman didn't fare so well in either fight he was in.
Lol at mentioning Superman, so emotional.
Originally posted by Adam GrimesTo use a sword doesn't mean she is that strong since it's her weapon that's cutting. Think boy. If someone uses a sword to kill someone do we say look how strong that guy was.
That's exactly how it works. Unless you can prove otherwise then WW was that strong and his sword that sharp. Unlike you.Lol at mentioning Superman, so emotional.
It's amusing how pathetic he is. I like to rub it in. I am happy.
Originally posted by quanchi112Lol, I take you know nothing about cutting force. But okay, it only hurts your argument even more because Thor doesn't have a sword, let alone one THAT sharp IYO. 👆
To use a sword doesn't mean she is that strong since it's her weapon that's cutting. Think boy. If someone uses a sword to kill someone do we say look how strong that guy was.It's amusing how pathetic he is. I like to rub it in. I am happy.
Originally posted by Adam GrimesThor doesn't need a sword and WW obviously needed more than her pitiful sword against just a cave troll.
Lol, I take you know nothing about cutting force. But okay, it only hurts your argument even more because Thor doesn't have a sword, let alone one THAT sharp IYO. 👆
Thor is a lot more impressive than I Quit for 100 years WW. Heroes that get their parents killed, murder and brand bad guys, and stand by and aren't prepared when bombs go off because they weren't paying attention.
Sad universe.
Originally posted by quanchi112Concession accepted
Thor doesn't need a sword and WW obviously needed more than her pitiful sword against just a cave troll.Thor is a lot more impressive than I Quit for 100 years WW. Heroes that get their parents killed, murder and brand bad guys, and stand by and aren't prepared when bombs go off because they weren't paying attention.
Sad universe.
Originally posted by Robtard
-Tanking a nuke and surviving a fall after atmospheric reentry is one of the better comic-film durability feats-Superman casually towing a massive cargo freighter is a better strength feat than Hulk's ship punch and DD easily overpowered Superman
In short, the crappy character wins
Can't agree here Big Rob, I don't think the cargo freighter is above the leviathan punch imo. It was impressive, just not as so imo.
I think the nuke is being kind of overstated some. Think about it, people were splurging all over the WE feat for superman. Claiming he resisted 10,000x the pressure and forces of Nuke. Yet here, surviving a nuke is deemed uber impressive. Seems odd imo. Not saying you made that claim, but it was viewed as much more impressive than a mere nuke. So it's odd that surviving a nuke is being lauded so much.