Originally posted by StealthRangerIt kills. If you feel he can resist it then prove it. How much pain do you think a nuke makes someone feel if they get hit by it ?
"It's killed humans so it can kill something that tanks nukes"Like saying I can down a glass of water in one go, therefore I could do the same to the ocean
And if you can prove that Crucio can output more pain than being at ground zero of a nuclear bomb, let me know
Originally posted by StealthRangerNot how the spell works. It is completely different. You claimed a nuke would make someone feel greater pain so prove it. You made the claim. Crucio and Avada Kedavra work unless you prove it can be resisted. That's how debating works.
Not how burden of proof works, mateWell between megatons of energy, millions of degrees celcius and radiation, yeah, certainly far more lethal than some shitty spell with little impressive feats to it's name
Originally posted by quanchi112http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Cruciatus_Curse
Not how the spell works. It is completely different. You claimed a nuke would make someone feel greater pain so prove it. You made the claim. Crucio and Avada Kedavra work unless you prove it can be resisted. That's how debating works.
"Once cast, there is no spell that can defend against the Cruciatus Curse.[7] However, there are still evasive options available against it. The spell can be dodged by hiding behind a solid object, and a particularly strong-willed wizard can merely resist the pain until the spell is lifted (though, as noted above, prolonged exposure can cause permanent mental damage). Another option is to interrupt the caster before they can finish speaking the incantation, as Severus Snape did to great effect against Harry Potter in 1997 by using Legilimency to anticipate the spells he would use."
Also LOL @ you. Harry Potter survived the AK twice and wrecked Voldemort both times 😂
Doomsday would have his savage way with the entire HP and LoTR universe
Originally posted by quanchi112
Not how the spell works.
"Lawl AK kills Doomsday"
"Prove it"
"Prove it can't"
Is not how vs debating works
It is completely different. You claimed a nuke would make someone feel greater pain so prove it. You made the claim. Crucio and Avada Kedavra work unless you prove it can be resisted. That's how debating works.
If you can show me any impressive feats that suggests that some spell can cause more pain than megatons of pressure, temperatures hotter than the sun's core and intense radiation, I'd be thrilled
Originally posted by Arachnid1There are magical defenses that can be used but can Doomsday use them. Nahhhhhh.
http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Cruciatus_Curse"Once cast, there is no spell that can defend against the Cruciatus Curse.[7] However, there are still evasive options available against it. The spell can be dodged by hiding behind a solid object, and a particularly strong-willed wizard can merely resist the pain until the spell is lifted (though, as noted above, prolonged exposure can cause permanent mental damage). Another option is to interrupt the caster before they can finish speaking the incantation, as Severus Snape did to great effect against Harry Potter in 1997 by using Legilimency to anticipate the spells he would use."
Also LOL @ you. Harry Potter survived the AK twice and wrecked Voldemort both times 😂
Doomsday would have his savage way with the entire HP and LoTR universe
Voldemort wins with a spell or so. Films only, boy.
Originally posted by quanchi112Not just magical defenses. You can dodge behind objects and the strong willed can fight through it. Voldemort is weak. Dumbledore>>>>Harry>>>>Voldemort
There are magical defenses that can be used but can Doomsday use them. Nahhhhhh.Voldemort wins with a spell or so. Films only, boy.
Prove an AK can kill Doomsday when its literally his power to survive. You say this:
Originally posted by quanchi112But the function of the nukes was to kill and atomize Doomsday. It failed, so it stands to reason that something significantly weaker like an AK or crucio fails too.
Apples and oranges. It's function is to cause pain.
Originally posted by Arachnid1No, he isn't. He dominated Albus despite Albus wielding the most powerful wand in existence. Voldemort also casually defeated Harry in a duel.
Voldemort is weak. Dumbledore>>>>Harry>>>>VoldemortProve an AK can kill Doomsday when its literally his power to survive. You say this:
But the function of the nukes was to kill and atomize Doomsday. It failed, so it stands to reason that something significantly weaker like an AK or crucio fails too.
By sheer power. The function of a nuke isn't to kill Doomsday. The function of the kill spell is to magically bring about death.
Cap can jump out of a plane and survive despite how powerful that is he can't resist someone smothering his nose and mouth. Apples and oranges. Greater attacks don't mean he can resist other attacks which would deprive him of oxygen. Think you ape.
Originally posted by Arachnid1Nukes weren't created with the sole purpose of killing doomsday. It is a powerful weapon they chose to use against him. Completely different than a magical spell specifically designed to kill.
So they sent the nuke into space for a light show? Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you?You've destroyed your own argument.
You ignored the rest of my post. Coward.
Originally posted by quanchi112Avada Kedavra wasn't created with the sole purpose of killing doomsday. It is a powerful spell they chose to use against him. Completely different than a nuclear weapon specifically designed to kill.
Nukes weren't created with the sole purpose of killing doomsday. It is a powerful weapon they chose to use against him. Completely different than a magical spell specifically designed to kill.You ignored the rest of my post. Coward.
Because the rest of the post is also wrong. Stay mad 😉
Originally posted by Arachnid1It is intended to kill. That's its specific function. Completely different than a nuke.
Avada Kedavra wasn't created with the sole purpose of killing doomsday. It is a powerful spell they chose to use against him. Completely different than a nuclear weapon specifically designed to kill.Because the rest of the post is also wrong. Stay mad 😉
Debating is proving it not avoiding because you can't rebut it.
Originally posted by quanchi112Nukes are weapons. Weapons are made to kill. Why are you so opinionated over a fact? Facts aren't subject to opinion.
It is intended to kill. That's its specific function. Completely different than a nuke.Debating is proving it not avoiding because you can't rebut it.
Debating is definitely proving. You have yet to prove an AK or crucio can work on doomsday. Take your own advice.
Originally posted by StealthRangerI can prove the spell works if you feel it can't then prove it.
"Lawl AK kills Doomsday"
"Prove it"
"Prove it can't"Is not how vs debating works
If you can show me any impressive feats that suggests that some spell can cause more pain than megatons of pressure, temperatures hotter than the sun's core and intense radiation, I'd be thrilled
So you believe the sun would cause intense pain ? You'd be dead before you felt anything you nitwit. Quit saying things you cannot prove.
Prove Doomsday can resist the Crucio or Ak.
Originally posted by Arachnid1So are bullets but they don't always kill either. Ak does unless you can resist or have magical protection. Prove it.
Nukes are weapons. Weapons are made to kill. Why are you so opinionated over a fact? Facts aren't subject to opinion.Debating is definitely proving. You have yet to prove an AK or crucio can work on doomsday. Take your own advice.
You need to prove he can resist since the spells have already been proven to work.
Originally posted by quanchi112So you're saying bullets=Nuke? A+ debating there, kid.
So are bullets but they don't always kill either. Ak does unless you can resist or have magical protection. Prove it.You need to prove he can resist since the spells have already been proven to work.
Nope, you need to prove it would work on Doomsday. He's more powerful than anything its ever worked on, and its literally his super power to survive.
Originally posted by Arachnid1You said weapons so I referenced weapon. You used the word weapons so now you try to distance yourself from a weapon.
So you're saying bullets=Nuke? A+ debating there, kid.Nope, you need to prove it would work on Doomsday. He's more powerful than anything its ever worked on, and its literally his super power to survive.
Apples and oranges. Nukes destroy bodies and anything it hits unless strong enough. Does Crucio ? Does Ak ? Do you know what magic is ?
Originally posted by quanchi112In other words, you think a knife is also = Nuke since its a weapon. smh @ middle school dropouts like you
You said weapons so I referenced weapon. You used the word weapons so now you try to distance yourself from a weapon.Apples and oranges. Nukes destroy bodies and anything it hits unless strong enough. Does Crucio ? Does Ak ? Do you know what magic is ?
Crucio and AK have never gone up against anything of note, so no they don't. They've never demonstrated more killing power than a Nuke at ground zero, and Doomsday tanked the shit out of that. Once again, you need to prove AK >>>>> a nuke
Originally posted by Arachnid1I never said a knife or gun equals the destructive power of a nuke. I said weapons made to kill aren't as automatic as Ak.
In other words, you think a knife is also = Nuke since its a weapon. smh @ middle school dropouts like youCrucio and AK have never gone up against anything of note, so no they don't. They've never demonstrated more killing power than a Nuke at ground zero, and Doomsday tanked the shit out of that. Once again, you need to prove AK >>>>> a nuke
Then prove he can resist the spells which are different than a nuke. Cap has survived more powerful attacks but can't survive without oxygen. Thus based off your claims smothering can't harm him since it's less powerful than what he has survived. Your logic like your breath is atrocious.