You do realize that this "last word game" takes two to perpetuate, right? 😬
How are you putting anyone in their place? I am about to accept a six figure job offer straight out of university, no debt carried. You brag constantly about having a job, but frankly, I'm not buying it.
I'm summa cum laude in mechanical engineering. You can't even string coherent posts together.
Funny; you vaguely point to my intellectual and grammatical failures, but fail to list a single actual example.
I remember a guy who was just like you. I think he called himself Darth Sexy or something. Was the village idiot who was obsessed with railing against The Mods in some quest for Freedom, or something. I kind of felt sorry for him. But you're right, I don't really know who you are. It's too bad you never met Sexy though, you would've gotten along so well.
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
If this was the case, why does it take you two months to ban these alleged "trolls"?It goes both ways Ush and lets be honest. Your "troll checker" is about as effective as Amare Stoudamire against a fire extinguisher. I've gone beyond caring to the point where it would be easy as hell for me to create as many names as I wish, if you decided to ban me for your pseudo logical reasons. If you ever showed a modicum of respect, you wouldn't get these kind of responses.
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Irony coming from a mod who has apparently earned as much respect as I have, and I start fights with people.How are you going to permanently exclude me Ush? You just said checking manually is slow and awkward and thousands of accounts created with thousands of different proxies is going to make it a living nightmare for you. Being a mod doesn't earn you respect automatically, and by your track record you've done the opposite. Now if you want to ban me, go ahead but there's going to be nothing "permanent" about it. Now I'm done. Toodles
^^ just cause you asked for support of that particular allegation.
Your hypocrisy continues to set forum records. Every single allegation you can throw at me for why I appear to be "insecure" applies to yourself tenfold, from needing to get the last word in (like creating a new email address just to do so!) to putting yourself above others intellectually. The difference, of course, is that, firstly, I only ever put down others who attack me first, rather than random people I've never quarreled with, and secondly, I am actually responsive to arguments. For example:
You really seem to understand what an illogical argument is. I'm waiting for you to make a logical one.. Or even AN argument.
Notice how I point out a specific flaw/double standard in one of your posts, and rather than explaining how I'm actually mistaken, your respond with a vague insult that has nothing to do with what you were quoting? Yep, I'm so impressed by your brilliance. 🙄
Originally posted by Nephthys
Yeah, Eli, you don't look insecure at all now. Good job.
It's a common pseudo-scientific belief among laypeople that anyone with a big ego must be secretly insecure. That's sort of like claiming that every homophobe must be a closeted gay - in some cases it may be the case, but a lot of them are actually straight and just don't like gay people.
Originally posted by Nephthys
when you put effort into proving how super not insecure you are you tend to just come off as more insecure just fyi
I know. I'm just an argumentative person; I enjoy debating about pretty much anything. Whether I come off as insecure, I don't particularly care. I'd only stop if I felt like I were mistreating someone - but hey, he started it.
Only Gideon's God's intellect rivals my own. I exist not as a human, but as a swirling vortex of brilliance, so far beyond the comprehension of silly mortals like yourself that you pests might as well be conversing with the heavens themselves.
I am The Ellimist.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
WHY U UZE REAL LIFE PHISICS IN STAR WARS!?!?!
This comeback didn't even make sense on Sunday when you wrote it so it doubly doesn't work now.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
😐 That was your brilliant argument? Cherry picking a typo? Oh, gosh, I'm so impressed.
Well firstly it wasn't cherry picking nor was it a typo. You had 3 opportunities to get it right and you blew it. Secondly, argument? I lol'd at you because you said something ridiculous. Get over it, nerd.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I had a bit of an interesting epiphany when I was reading through and trying to understand your reply. I think a good way to test the depths of someone's understanding of a subject is to push discussion topics until they no longer become responsive to what you're saying. We've clearly passed that event horizon with you - you repeat your initial contention that "physics don't apply to Star Wars!" which, interestingly enough, happens to be the very argument that I just tried to address in seven different ways. Did you bother to analyze any of those responses? Of course not - we've passed the event horizon.
I also had an epiphany, where I enjoyed the irony of you acting like King Shit while talking about how amazingly smart you are, while simultaneously being too stupid to figure out my actual argument. It was like a funny little miracle that happened in my heart.
My point isn't "physics don't apply to Star Wars", it's that in Star Wars there exists technology that can blatantly ignore or contradict physics. There are machines that simulate the gravitational pull of a planet on starships. You think they line the bottom of shuttles with the equivalent to 300 trillion tons of mass? No, they just manipulate gravity because that's something you just can do in Star Wars. They regularly push the laws of physics over a pinball machine and go Indiana Jones on them. It's impossible to use real physics to calculate how much mass a "black hole" has when the dang thing was created using physics-defying magic technology/biology? in the first place. The fatal flaw in your argument is that you cannot get around this basic fact and you cannot reliably prove anything.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
And the Force isn't? Because we still try to make logical predictions about whose feats surpass one anothers', and it seems like you [at least try to] do this as well. The only distinction between that and this is that this is a little complicated for you (even though it's still fairly elementary...). But how complicated it is has nothing to do with whether it's reasonable.
The Force is an obviously impossible concept, built off of made up magic science. However the fantastical explanation for how it works allows us to suspend our disbelief and it's internally consistent enough with it's rules and how it functions to discuss in a way that's logical and reasonable. On the flipside you don't know anything about how Dovin Basal's work. You don't know the mechanics of the singularities they create or how anything related to them functions. You're making the rules up as you go, as it suits your purposes to do so.
It's also kind of funny how you bring up the Force when the Force can manipulate gravity without relying on mass or anything, pretty easily.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I...already responded to that, heck I think I did in the OP, and then I repeated it in different wordings and phrases to you. Again, though, we're past the event horizon of your understanding.Having them be "magic bullshit black holes" in the sense of requiring less mass for a certain gravitational field would violate mass-energy equivalence and conservation.
I find it hilarious that you're talking about some sort of threshold whereby someone ceases registering their opponents response and just spams the same thing over and over, while guilty of doing just that while being too thick to be self-aware about it. Again, tiny miracle etc. You're the dumbass that keeps giving. Like St. Stupid in a shiny red dunce hat, wearing elf slippers with the bells tied together, carrying a sack full of rotting dog carcasses and fallacies.
It would violate mass energy equivalence and conservation?! In Star Wars??! No waaaaay!!!!! They already are magic bullshit black holes. Ain't no ****ing artificial black holes in real life. How could we possibly predict how they work, when they're they're very existence is so blatantly impossible in the first place. Also aren't Dovin Basals animals? And according to you they can just pop millions of tons out of thin air whenever they want? Doesn't that violate mass-energy equivalence and conservation? Where the hell do these black holes come from? Do they poop em out? What do they feed those ****in' things, jesus.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I already responded to this as well (of course, since you only gave the most cookie cutter, obvious reasponses ever).
Ghey. At least put some effort into ducking the point, dickspray.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
You "highly doubt" elementary mathematics, that I can see. Everest masses around 10^14 kg if you estimate its volume and density from reasonable premises. Estimates of the total number of humans to have ever lived hover around 100 billion. The average human weighs IIRC around 75 kg. 100 billion * 75 = 7.5*10^12, which is less than 10^14. Fail harder please.
Lol, I knew you'd actually do the math if I b8ed you about it.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Yes, you obviously could easily have done so if you wanted to, clearly the only thing lacking is motivation. 🙄Regardless, you've sort of admitted that no superior alternative exists.
No superior model exists because it's impossible to actually calculate it when it's based on so many unknown variables.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
And yet you dedicate a vast portion of your life to comparing how well different characters can manipulate a mystical energy field. Talk about double standards. 👆
Yeah, but my dick is a WMD. I can literally force you to your knees before it. Bow down, b*tch.