Quasar vs. Blue Marvel

Started by jrodslam3 pages

If Quasar can keep the concentration with his structures being smashed constantly, hed lose. I personally dont think BM has enough fights under his belt. True he has harder times with those who are more of a powerhouse type. Ill only give him a slight edge.

Yat has nothing to do with anything whatsoever. BM can travel at those speeds immediately as seen when he took off from across the country and hit Zom in seconds. Are there any other real world physics that you'd like to add to this fictional thread? Also, if your post was strictly about Yat, which I wasn't arguing because he has nothing to do with the OP topic, why did you then go on about how Quasar would drain BM without knowledge of whether or not BM...

My bad.
I brought up Yat. I have nothing to do with the unneeded physics lesson though.

Originally posted by riv6672
My bad.
I brought up Yat. I have nothing to do with the unneeded physics lesson though.

I wasn't tripping about Yat. What I was trying to say was that when I quoted him, my argument was centered on Quasar vs Adam. Yat had nothing to do with my train of thought, other than wondering where such strong claims were coming from. I mean Adam has yet to have a poor showing, and according to what was written, it would take a lot from some very powerful characters in order to KO Adam. Both times that Adam was floored he wasn't exactly ready for the impact. King Hyperion sucker punched him when he thought that they could talk it out, which IMO resulted in a stun, and not a KO. The 2nd time was when Sentry dive bombed him while he was not ready for it, resulting in a KO that he nearly fought off. Aside from that, I don't know where people are coming from with really strong claims of who would actually stomp BM. I could see Tyrant stomping him, but no high herald is going to do any such thing IMO. Which brings us back to Quasar. I can't see him winning this at all.

Ah, okay. The reason i brought up YAt, is i agree with your high herald opinion. The Yat thread really helped cement my opinion on BM. Quasar just isnt going to win this one.

Quasar. He's a tried and true character who has been battle rested. When BM grows up a bit maybe until then he's still a noob

That reasoning is kind of silly.
BM premiered in 2008. If he were a DC character he'd have been rebooted at least 3 times by now.
The last being the New52.
Those noobs are way noobier than BM.

Originally posted by Stoic
I wasn't tripping about Yat. What I was trying to say was that when I quoted him, my argument was centered on Quasar vs Adam. Yat had nothing to do with my train of thought, other than wondering where such strong claims were coming from. I mean Adam has yet to have a poor showing, and according to what was written, it would take a lot from some very powerful characters in order to KO Adam. Both times that Adam was floored he wasn't exactly ready for the impact. King Hyperion sucker punched him when he thought that they could talk it out, which IMO resulted in a stun, and not a KO. The 2nd time was when Sentry dive bombed him while he was not ready for it, resulting in a KO that he nearly fought off. Aside from that, I don't know where people are coming from with really strong claims of who would actually stomp BM. I could see Tyrant stomping him, but no high herald is going to do any such thing IMO. Which brings us back to Quasar. I can't see him winning this at all.
But that's fallacious reasoning. Just because a character didn't have a low showing doesn't mean they can beat anyone in their tier.
A sucker punch is worth between 3-5 normal punches on average. So BM can take at most 5 punches from Sentry before going down.

Who the **** taught you fight club math? 😆