Lord Lucien
Lets all love Lain
When people with good intentions--and I do say they have those, regardless of how counterproductive their results may be--meddle and interfere with things for the sake of improvement... they're meddlers, not SJWs. This is why I have a problem with the labeling and naming we love to dish out. Now the 'SJW' pejorative has started to mar the very words 'social justice'. So we get caught up with those buzzwords that the guy with green text up there likes to throw out for the sake of incense. It's why I spend so much time mocking them. F*cking LIBTARD! See, goes nowhere and means nothing--just emotion, nothing more. Getting caught up in a case-by-case basis also skews perception. It's akin to the phenomena where people think the world is "going to hell in a handbasket" because of all the negative reports in the media. Well bad news sells, and controversial news sells even more. It distorts our perception of the balance between reality v. reporting of reality.
So in regards to those people "pressing their agenda", what of it? If it's a cynical, dishonest, marketable agenda designed for inciting the public to... make money or gain power (or whatever), then yeah, I hear ya. F*ck that agenda. But what if their agenda is to make the state, or the city, or the school, or the world a better place--as THEY define "better?" What makes that type of agenda "bad" (again, that word)? What makes it wrong, or destructive even? And do you have an alternative in mind to what they want? Why is yours better? Why is theirs unworthy?
In any agenda (or movement, or organization, or party, or policy--whatever), you're gonna come across an unfortunate amount of people who either twist the ideas to suit their own preconceptions or desires, or who misinterpret them, or who just don't live up to them (hypocrites). Those people are unavoidable, and sometimes even innocent of malicious intent, but their actions don't discredit the agenda (or organization, or movement, or party etc.) or it's values as a whole. Only the agenda itself can do that. So what is wrong with the agenda of social justice?