Originally posted by Selenial
mmmSo IYO, Arcann > Vader because he was a far more successful villain?
Sure he didn't achieve his ultimate goal [usurping Palpatine], but given who Sids is --- is this actually a minus on his resume?
Besides that, I don't think Arcann is seen as a bigger deal than Vader in the thick of things. We have statements, both subjective, and objective, labeling him one of the most powerful and skilled Sith Lords ever, 80% the Emperor power, and "near unparalleled" with a lightsaber.