Originally posted by BeniboyblingI don't find the talk of Maul declining physically being overly compelling given that there's way more examples of Sith growing in overall power despite physical decline (opposed to Ben Kenobi, a Jedi hermit). The Force transcends the physical body until it gets extreme.
Who wins? 🙂
He's been building on the teachings he received from Sidious and going through ancient temples, ergo he should be more powerful in the Force than before, which ties into everything combat related. Rebels Maul on that basis is better.
Originally posted by FreshestSlicenot to mention he couldn't twirl his blade half as fast as savage could twirl his, so even though his force powers increased it couldn't be by to much heck even if he learned some new tricks his younger self was in much better physical condition than the new one even though still in remarkable shape for his age(like 60-80 right?) but yeah he should have stomped konan who left before completing training and also is only a self proclaimed knight(besides ahsoka)
Who even cares about evidence when you have that grorious opinion? Maul obviously has grown weaker because he didn't lolstomp Kanan and Ahsoka at the same time. It's the only thing that makes sense.