Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Saying that Meetra is above Kenobi because he can't replicate her circumstantial feats are pretty ridiculous when you consider that Meetra can't stomp Grievous or beat RotS Anakin or Maul & Savage 😬
Que?
How are you basing the fact Meetra can't take on Grievous, beat a circumstantial RotS Anakin, or circumstantially beat Maul and Savage?
See, I'm basing Kenobi not being able to replicate her feats on:
- The fact most Jedi couldn't even survive traversing Malachor without falling to the Dark Side.
- The fact Kenobi has been man handled by Dooku, whereas Traya on a Dark Side Nexus could not overwhelm Surik with Telekinesis.
- The fact she was one of the few Jedi to reach enlightenment, which according to the Prima guide increased her Speed, Strength and Stamina to the highest levels achievable.
- The opinion that Kenobi lacks the stamina to replicate any part of her feat on Malachor.
... among other things. Whereas you're basing Surik not being able to replicate Kenobi's accomplishments on what, a lack of accolades given a lack of exploration? How highly you arbitrarily rank Traya and Sion as duelists? How weakened you think Nihilus was after his failure to drain Surik?
As one sided as it may be, Kenobi is explored in far greater detail than Surik is, so it's far easier to place him in her shoes than the other way around. Countering Kenobi's inability to replicate her feats with you believing she can't replicate his, doesn't quite work in the same way. We never saw Wound!Surik's limits, but we've seen Kenobi's.
Though I'm not saying she's his better in every way. I doubt she's a better duelist, etc. Just that I think holistically she edges him out.