Originally posted by Surtur
What if we defined radical as those merely with radical beliefs? So they might not be willing to make an attack, but they have no problems with these attacks either.
Having no problems with attacks like 9/11 and the Paris Attacks? I don't think that that number is that much higher. I haven't found statistics though.
I do like your definition though. It does help differentiate between radical Religious thought (that many Christians in the west hold as well) and radical, potentially violent, anti-West sentiment.