I'll direct this question to those philosophers in the crowd:
CA Superman and Mandrakk were meta-conceptual beings. Superman was a "self-assembling hyper-story" and Mandrakk the opposite - consuming stories.
Now, I completely understand how being a self-assembling hyper-story makes one nigh-invincible. The whole point was that Superman's story was so great that he couldn't be erased, after all. But aside from defeating anti-story, I don't know on a conceptual level how the Cosmic Armor is equipped to defeat...anyone.
Just throwing that out there. Looking for Galan to take me to school...
Well, the context of the story may have been metatextual, but I don't think Thought-Robot and Mandrakk were *just* metatextual beings. After all, we saw what happened when a small portion of Mandrakk's power(in the form of Rox Ogama/Mandrakk II) entered the mainstream multiverse. He was still the most powerful foe in all creation--well above the likes of even Spectre and Radiant(the former of which had finally realized his full potential in the Revelations prelude crossover.) So yeah...
Also, it wasn't *just* Superman powering Thought-Robot... Ultraman's essence was also required. Without this 'fusing of symmetries', Superman's story alone would not have been enough to even activate Thought-Robot--let alone defeat Mandrakk.
Anywho, those being(s) whom operate on a higher plane/scale than the Monitors *should* be above Thought-Robot/Mandrakk... And there aren't many.
I want to say something for CAS though.
But, I will not take part in this topic because it must lead to terrible shit storm.
Originally posted by ghostman
no feats that come close to ca supes. i mean yeah he was orders of magnitude above the chousin, and theyre multiversal, but in the end he really didnt do anythinghis fans claim him to be omnipotent but no official source says so.