Sylvar vs Ahsoka Tano

Started by AncientPower5 pages

I said Tano not dying immediately in a duel with either Sith doesn't immediately equate stomping somebody like Sylvar. You could've argued far better stances in terms of dueling but stuck to a fallacy, for some bizarre reasoning.

As if you know me even remotely to begin with. Tano being capable of a similar feat is the question due to the fact she's never done anything remotely similar in a combat situation.

Yet you could've done so from the start, given it's by far their largest disparity.

Originally posted by AncientPower
I said Tano not dying immediately in a duel with either Sith doesn't immediately equate stomping somebody like Sylvar. You could've argued far better stances in terms of dueling but stuck to a fallacy, for some bizarre reasoning.

Again, you didn't argue that. You legitimately said Sylvar can perform similary as Tano against the two Sith and used a bad example for it. I simply showed why she couldn't perform as well as Tano and why your example is a poor one.

Originally posted by AncientPower
As if you know me even remotely to begin with. Tano being capable of a similar feat is the question due to the fact she's never done anything remotely similar in a combat situation.

Oh, and you're sooo mysterious, are you? You give Batman a run for his money just how mysterious you are. I've also never been to KMC or seen this forum before, have I? I just magically appeared and started spamming my Ahsoka Tano wank?

She's also never really had the chance to do anything similar. Though, honestly, beating up Clone Troopers and speedblitzing several dozens of droids as a padawan would imply she, in her prime, can kill a nest of primitive bugs.

Originally posted by AncientPower
Yet you could've done so from the start, given it's by far their largest disparity.

I kept it more dueling-centric simply because Ahsoka is primarily a duelist and it's the area you were arguing Sylvar can match Tano in.

I said Sylvar can duel them, without much success, as well. Thus such a 'feat' isn't some immediate sign of being on a higher level, Vader isn't Chris Jericho. If you'd argued Tano's other dueling feats you would have been on to something, I.E taking on Grievous way before her prime.

You've been making assumptions about me since your first reply and apparently long beforehand.

I didn't say Sylvar is as skilled as Tano, only that Tano's performance is hardly irreplicable and is certainly no sign she stomps Sylvar.

Originally posted by AncientPower
I said Sylvar can duel them, without much success, as well. Thus such a 'feat' isn't some immediate sign of being on a higher level, Vader isn't Chris Jericho. If you'd argued Tano's other dueling feats you would have been on to something, I.E taking on Grievous way before her prime.

I kinda forget Ahsoka's TCW feats because TCW in general is just underwhelming, tbh. But you said Sylvar should perform similarly, thus you placed parity between her and Tano. But, Tano's performances against Maul and Vader are certainly something outside of Sylvar's paygrade.

Originally posted by AncientPower
You've been making assumptions about me since your first reply and apparently long beforehand.

Another useless tangent. And, if 90% of the users on here are anything to go by, my "assumptions" are correct.

Originally posted by AncientPower
I didn't say Sylvar is as skilled as Tano, only that Tano's performance is hardly irreplicable and is certainly no sign she stomps Sylvar.

And I didn't say Tano stomps Sylvar, and in the case of Sylvar yeah it is sorta irreplicable because she can't hold her own to the same extent Tano can, not even close.