Beniboybling
Worst Member
Originally posted by MythLord
Um, Kenobi has collapsed four trees larger than a massive shuttle, blew apart Durge(who's unharmed by dozens of blaster bolts or explosions that damage Anakin), and has deflected blows from Mustafar Vader, traded telekinetic blows with Vader, and somehow that doesn't matter because he was floored by one of an enraged Savage's waves with his back turned?
Collapsing a structure isn't quite the same as moving an object against the gravity and friction friend, regardless of size all he'd have to do is uproot and give them a push.
In fact, we see Kenobi exert notably more effort in pushing Durge's smaller craft.
And regarding Durge, first of all he isn't blaster proof, instead we've seen blasters go straight through him. And he only tanked an explosion when armoured, with undetermined damage done to his physical body.
So no, blowing apart a cell of Mandalorion iron > blowing apart Durge, and that's without scaling Savage of OCW's exaggerated showings. 😉
Moving on, trading blows with a hindered Vader doesn't change the fact his feats are holistically inferior to Savage's, whose powers he's repeatedly been overwhelmed by. And considering Savage replicated that feat on Toydaria and his repulses have blown Maul off his feet, I really don't think Kenobi being forward facing would have made a difference.
Prior to them growing in power(Anakin in particular grew "vastly"😉 and in a medium which lowballs Force sensitives where not even Dooku could do anything but floor a doezn Pykes for a few seconds.
A medium that lowballs Force sensitives? You mean TCW? The same medium from which all Savage's feats are derived? Lol, that makes them directly comparable, and also means you must concede that each and every of Savage's showings unrepresented his abilities. Funny how you fail to apply this standard to OCW, and talk about shooting yourself in the foot... 😬
Also Kenobi's growth is what's important here, and I'm not seeing any evidence to suggesting it enough to make up for feats an order of magnitude superior to his own.
It kinda does, given that the lightning Dooku threw at Savage did nothing but slow him down and it says "abilities", which means it's more than just the singular ability of lightning.All it took was for Dooku to not even face Savage and Opress to get a rage amp for him to choke and throw Dooku, yes. Somehow that means he isn't going to be hurled back by Dooku's own TK?
The lightning Dooku threw at Savage made him almost a non-factor in the fight, so hardly, and he's employing his abilities against multiple opponents, so of course it's in plural.
And what with this obsession with being forward facing? Yes, Savage dominated Dooku fair and square, and it took "all the power" of Ventress and Dooku combined to defeat him. Essentially when enraged, Savage was far more powerful than him, so we can hardly claim when not, the opposite would be true, especially when Savage has advanced since then.
Let's not start changing the goalposts either, the claim made was that Dooku could ragdoll/KO Savage with his powers a la Kenobi, not just hurl him.
And I'm well aware of his growth in the Force, but Dooku would've likely had a growth as well given his own substantial potential in the Force, albeit it not as noticeably as Opress.
But can you prove that? Dooku is 80 years old, his potential seems more or less fulfilled.