Do we accept novel blurbs and publisher summaries?

Started by The Ellimist7 pages

And if the 2003 Clone Wars hadn't been published, you'd have put Rivu Ani above Yoda?

Rivi Anu is from the 2003 Clone Wars, just the comic off-shoot.

* if Yoda hadn't done that

Originally posted by The Ellimist
And if the 2003 Clone Wars hadn't been published, you'd have put Rivu Ani above Yoda?

Why do you ask?

It seems like your rebuttal was ad hoc, because we all know you'd still have Yoda > Rivi if he hadn't moved those transports.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
It seems like your rebuttal was ad hoc, because we all know you'd still have Yoda > Rivi if he hadn't moved those transports.

Heh. Heh heh...

The vote is currently tied.

A vote has been added to each side, so the result is still tied.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
No.

👆

Originally posted by SunRazer
I'll be counting KMC's votes to declare an official consensus.

No-one gives a shit what you declare tbh.

True, there's too many of you morons voting for it to be worth caring about 🙂

Originally posted by Ziggystardust
There is nothing outside the text 🙄

So no. And I doubt it's a case of votes either. They're not part of the canon as it's defined. So if you're thinking of using appeals to popular belief, then let me remind you the same philosophy is commonly used to rationalize bribery. And in the past, slavery. 👆

Aren't they? Right, well this is canon as it's defined by Leland Chee:

"...continuity "C" canon which is pretty much everything else." By everything else I mean EVERYthing else. Novels, comics, junior novels, videogames, trading card games, roleplaying games, toys, websites, television. As I've mentioned earlier, any contradictions that arise are dealt on a case-by-case.

This has been our general approach to continuity since we began using the Holocron database to track it."

Pretty sure publishers summaries would come under "everything", so yes they are part of the canon "as it's defined."

Anyway I voted yes. Going by the above they should be treated as canon, and I personally find it hard to believe that a statement as specific as to state Caedus to be more powerful than Vader could be made arbitrarily and without consultance or at least vetting.

It also stands to reason that the publishers work closely with Lucasfilm, as is common when dealing with liscensed material, especially when that material has a monitored continuity.

However I also increasingly agree with Elliminst that even canon statements can be fallible. I think that would more so be the case for a publishing summary, and in general the further you move away from objective/movie Canon and Lucas Liscensing in general, this is especially true as of Legends.

And Bastila Shan is Dooku level. 👆

10/10 reading skills Fresh. 🙂

🙂

Beni, you said everything, and it's a pretty infallible statement. Either accept that Bastila is in the same league as Dooku, or kill yourself. These are the only two options.

Suicide is never the solution 🙂

Unless u're Polish, muslim, black, immigrant, communist or libertarian 🙂

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Beni, you said everything, and it's a pretty infallible statement. Either accept that Bastila is in the same league as Dooku, or kill yourself. These are the only two options.
When it lumps Yoda in the same tier with Windu and Vader, and Dooku in the same tier as Obi-Wan, against established facts both shown and stated, its accuracy and reliability should be brought into serious question, especially considering the source of origin. Nice try though. 😉

On the other hand don't pretend you'd take it any less seriously if it were stated in the KOTOR campaign guide, lawls.

Beni murdering Freshest brutally so far 🙂

Freshest has been pretty ****ing lacklustre recently. It's been disappointing to watch his fall 🙂

Originally posted by Selenial
Freshest has been pretty ****ing lacklustre recently. It's been disappointing to watch his fall 🙂

What's disappointing in seeing someone's failure and his way towards the darkness 🙂 🙂