Originally posted by Kazenji
They haven't even confirmed it is Boba Fettbut anyway you're the one that's gullible that believes anything.
Well I pretty much figured it WASN'T Boba, because it is called "THE Mandalorian" which would imply it is the FIRST, but seeing as how the New Continuity of Star Wars is so Fraked up thanks to the cartoons and canon fan fiction...it is guranteed to be a pretty messed up pile of bantha poo poo.
Or in other words....QUAN/Kan Approved Poo Poo!
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok then you had rogue one make far less than TLJ. So by the next film criteria it did much better so I still have you.Not every film can make 2 billion and TFA had ten years of nothing leading up to it. I said that played a small role along with other variables. Superman is not bankable in that he never sniffed a billion like Star Wars has every time save solo. I am correct Superman is not big league anymore. Hence why warner is not going to pay Cavill big money to portray him anymore. Best to proceed with other newer more exciting characters.
Man of Steel cost more than the first Avengers proving my point. They even mock its 668 or so million return to the first avengers. It is not a massive tent poor franchise which is my point. Superman is not a draw anymore.
I think much of the disappointment of The Last Jedi stems from the promise of the Force Awakens. Many expectations from TFA were not met by Rian Johnson's direction, and most were utterly shuffled under the rug to be forgotten.
I'm surprised that you - Quan - would defend that in particular, as you are far more of a fan of J.J. Abrams than Rian Johnson, and what Johnson did utterly sh!t on all the hard groundwork Abrams laid out. The plot for Snoke in Abrams' script was a whole hell of a lot better than what Johnson did....
But that's not here or there I guess. For me, much of what Johnson did was too nonsensical, gave way too much of the uncanny valley vibe, for me to really enjoy. The Star Wars ships for example have been nerfballed so hard that now they are utter sh!t. It's a shame that the hatred runoff from this affected Solo so badly, because outside of what they DID to Lando (Turning him into a robosexual technophile), Solo was not too bad on it's own.
Johnson made a better film than Abrams but I agree it was a mistake to not continue some of the story threads from the first. It was not perfect but my favorite Star Wars film narrowly beating rots for me. I believe Abrams will improve for the finale. I do not like the toxic Star Wars fans out there openly boycotting their own brand.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Johnson made a better film than Abrams but I agree it was a mistake to not continue some of the story threads from the first. It was not perfect but my favorite Star Wars film narrowly beating rots for me. I believe Abrams will improve for the finale. I do not like the toxic Star Wars fans out there openly boycotting their own brand.
Well, I mean I disagree, but I'm not going to tell you what to like or not like, as that's up to you, and I despise conformists.
The boycot was an act of vengeance and sabotage. While I agree everyone should speak with their wallets in voicing their opinion of a particular movie, it shouldn't run over to other movies. People disliked X3 for example, but Logan was an awsome film to many. People liked the Reeve Superman 1, and hated 4. Some liked Jaws 1 and loathed Jaws 3 and 4. But in all those instances, I've never even heard the word "Boycott"
Originally posted by Darkstorm ZeroI agree that is why my opinion remains my own. I concur just one film I do not like does not mean I will not enjoy the next. YouTube channels encouraging boycotts until Kathy was fired.
Well, I mean I disagree, but I'm not going to tell you what to like or not like, as that's up to you, and I despise conformists.The boycot was an act of vengeance and sabotage. While I agree everyone should speak with their wallets in voicing their opinion of a particular movie, it shouldn't run over to other movies. People disliked X3 for example, but Logan was an awsome film to many. People liked the Reeve Superman 1, and hated 4. Some liked Jaws 1 and loathed Jaws 3 and 4. But in all those instances, I've never even heard the word "Boycott"
Originally posted by quanchi112
I agree that is why my opinion remains my own. I concur just one film I do not like does not mean I will not enjoy the next. YouTube channels encouraging boycotts until Kathy was fired.
Up until about 3 years ago, the only time I heard the word Boycott was limited to people avoiding particular fast food chains for poor service and poor product or some shit. (Yep, Aussie with limited interest in things like the Cold War Olympics schenanigans at the time) but now....