Aquaman (2018)

Started by Darth Thor116 pages

Yeah theyre not gonna cancel the sequel to the biggest DC box office film of all time.

And cancel for what? The guy in the lead role didnt do anything.

Honestly, wouldn't care if they kept her scenes, movie was already filmed. Just replace her for the next film.

But from what was said previously, her screen time was cut down to less than 10 minutes in the final cut.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Heh, true. While I enjoyed the first Aquaman, I wouldnt lose sleep over something happening to the sequel if it meant getting rid of her. Not many are caring for A2 anyway since she ruined the Aquaman brand so to speak.

And Flash? Definitely. Even ignoring the Ezra stuff, already wasnt looking forward to it with how I heard they were gonna do Flashpoint, and felt like another skip for me far as watching.

👆

Fuck DC. Nobody likes their stuff, anyway.

Referring to DCEU particularly? If so I mostly agree, but not everything DC in a vacuum is deserving of scorn.

I've accepted though that everyone will be old by the time there comes a proper DC cinematic universe, with Batman V Superman done right, etc.

If it happens at all, but just enjoy whatever we can that's good with the time we have, yeah?

Originally posted by Robtard
Honestly, wouldn't care if they kept her scenes, movie was already filmed. Just replace her for the next film.

But from what was said previously, her screen time was cut down to less than 10 minutes in the final cut.

Why replace her.

Cos she's toxic, she lied about being abused to try and bring someone else down. She's a fake victim and gives the real victims of spousal abuse a bad name.

Though honestly, if they kept her I wouldn't care too much, as I can separate the artist from the degenerate. But I understand why the studio wants to distance itself from her, she could/would cost them money.

Originally posted by Robtard
Cos she's toxic, she lied about being abused to try and bring someone else down. She's a fake victim and gives the real victims of spousal abuse a bad name.

Though honestly, if they kept her I wouldn't care too much, as I can separate the artist from the degenerate. But I understand why the studio wants to distance itself from her, she could/would cost them money.

You see, my unpopular opinion is both of them probably lied and are shitty people. I honestly have no idea who abused who most and had I been on that Jury I would have struggled to find in favour of either Rob.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Referring to DCEU particularly? If so I mostly agree, but not everything DC in a vacuum is deserving of scorn.

I've accepted though that everyone will be old by the time there comes a proper DC cinematic universe, with Batman V Superman done right, etc.

If it happens at all, but just enjoy whatever we can that's good with the time we have, yeah?

We're in the movie forum, so yeah, dceu.

But I've never kept it a secret that I hate DC as a whole.

They've had Supes stuttering and shitting his pants in front of Putin in Doomsday Clock --- fuck them and their shitty characters.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
We're in the movie forum, so yeah, dceu.

But I've never kept it a secret that I hate DC as a whole.

They've had Supes stuttering and shitting his pants in front of Putin in Doomsday Clock --- fuck them and their shitty characters.

That seems extreme Stilt 😂 You haven't been replaced by Bizarro Broly have you old pal. 😂

You know me. I've been wiping my asshole with Clark's cape for f*cking 14 years.

But DC sure knows even worse ways to disrespect the character than I do.

My main issue is just DC characters being disrespected in favor of Batwank, but can understand not liking DC as a whole, all things considered. Some used to like DC but not anymore because of Batwank and other things.

Funny thing, I'm actually fine with the Batwank.

It's literally everything else that bothers me about their comicverse 😛

Superdouche, Pedostroke, Rainbow Lanterns and of course Arthur Curry:

Originally posted by Robtard
Cos she's toxic, she lied about being abused to try and bring someone else down. She's a fake victim and gives the real victims of spousal abuse a bad name.

Though honestly, if they kept her I wouldn't care too much, as I can separate the artist from the degenerate. But I understand why the studio wants to distance itself from her, she could/would cost them money.

I'm kind of the same. I couldn't care less whether she's in it or not. It would probably be a better movie without her because she had zero chemistry, but the movie is shit anyway, so I don't really care.

Now Heard’s free to jump ship to DC and play a deserving character.

Though yeah, like Robtard I wouldn’t care if they kept her in the movie.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah theyre not gonna cancel the sequel to the biggest DC box office film of all time.

And cancel for what? The guy in the lead role didnt do anything.

Stilt's just a DC hater in general, Also has some a weird fetish for Aquaman getting raped.

I agree that cancelling Aquaman 2 over her would be a bit much when she's not even the lead (my expressed agreement to Stilt's earlier post was mainly in regards to the Flash film which I think will be an unmitigated disaster), but many are still not going to see A2 because of her connection to it. That's a fact. You guys might see it, but question is will the majority still see it? I just wonder how much DC fans boycotting it (many of whom are also Depp fans) will hurt it.

It is kinda bullshit they're doing nothing about Ezra Miller with what he's gotten up to lately. Yet they remove Depp from Fantastic Beast's

get your shit together WB's.

There was also that Animaniacs reboot that mocked Depp and called him a liar in part of one episode.

Disney was no better though, with how quick they were to reboot Pirates of the Caribbean and replace Depp. All companies and media were initially against him because he wasn't the woman of the abusive relationship.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Depp … wasn't the woman ...

^^^Oh, he was def. the woman. whistling

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
I agree that cancelling Aquaman 2 over her would be a bit much when she's not even the lead (my expressed agreement to Stilt's earlier post was mainly in regards to the Flash film which I think will be an unmitigated disaster), but many are still not going to see A2 because of her connection to it. That's a fact. You guys might see it, but question is will the majority still see it? I just wonder how much DC fans boycotting it (many of whom are also Depp fans) will hurt it.

I think people will understand it was filmed before the trial, and her role was minimised because of the trial, despite her winning the UK one (well the Sun won that one because it was more about freedom of the press).

Honestly though she might still get work. Plenty of feminists will still believe her. But doubt she will work for a big studio again.