Originally posted by Robtard
Edit: though whatever wikileaks is supposed to come out, could affect that, but that's not Trump
WikiLeaks has ruined its reputation as a whistle blower.
Especially since there is evidence that the DNC emails were altered before being released.
A daily Kos story does not make it true. Those two sentences you wrote that were attached to hyperlinks are you're opinion as well, and not facts. Wiki Leaks on the contrary has a high success rate and they have never been wrong or damaged their credibility. They are not the hackers. I would advise you do some some research instead of parroting mis information.
Ah cute left wing sites needed for confirmation bias. I don't support wikileaks at all because an invasion of privacy is just that. With that said, reading the title of the story alone begins with a false premise. If wikileaks "ruined" its reputation in any way, the polls wouldn't be moving the way they are. The only reputation that's being ruined is Hilary's.
Here's another newsflash. Wikileaks was already known as a whistleblower website when Snowden came out. Good try though 👆
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Ah cute left wing sites needed for confirmation bias. I don't support wikileaks at all because an invasion of privacy is just that. With that said, reading the title of the story alone begins with a false premise. If wikileaks "ruined" its reputation in any way, the polls wouldn't be moving the way they are. The only reputation that's being ruined is Hilary's.Here's another newsflash. Wikileaks was already known as a whistleblower website when Snowden came out. Good try though 👆
👆
Originally posted by Politico
Wiki Leaks on the contrary has a high success rate and they have never been wrong or damaged their credibility. They are not the hackers. I would advise you do some some research instead of parroting mis information.
Cute.
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Ah cute left wing sites needed for confirmation bias. I don't support wikileaks at all because an invasion of privacy is just that. With that said, reading the title of the story alone begins with a false premise. If wikileaks "ruined" its reputation in any way, the polls wouldn't be moving the way they are. The only reputation that's being ruined is Hilary's.Here's another newsflash. Wikileaks was already known as a whistleblower website when Snowden came out. Good try though 👆
The Associated Press is not a left wing site, and the Daily Kos article merely presented information aggregated from other news sites, which are cited in the body of the article. You would know that if you actually read it. Nice try, indeed.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Cute.The Associated Press is not a left wing site, and the Daily Kos article merely presented information aggregated from other news sites, which are cited in the body of the article. You would know that if you actually read it. Nice try, indeed.
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/daily-kos/
You were saying? Also great job ignoring the actual point i was making which you completely missed while desperately searching for anything to fit your agenda. 👆
I wonder how easy you'll throw out a fox news article if it also merely presented the facts. Double standards ftw!
Transcript: "We, Mexicans, have to kill Donald J. Trump before he becomes President. He is a threat to every single one of us. There are many Mexican Americans living in the U.S. right now and I'm asking them to kill Donald Trump before he becomes President. The one in Mexico who have the means, I'm asking you to cross the border and go and kill Donald Trump, and as many of his supporters as possible. Anywhere he goes just try to bomb the place, shoot up the place, do something. If you could go back in time and kill Hitler, and kill the Nazis, would you do it? We have a modern day Hitler, and we have to kill him before he gets into power. So I want you to spread this message, and I'm encouraging every single Mexican out there who has the guts to stand up for the Mexican people and to kill Trump and his Nazi followers. Let's do this. Viva Mexico! **** those motherf***ers."
Source: An Illegal Immigrant
https://www.facebook.com/Operation-Mogul-Fury-502478809958664/
Hillary is already threatening war with Russia
Hillary Clinton: “You’ve seen the reports. Russia’s hacked into a lot of things, China’s hacked into a lot of things. Russia even hacked into the Democratic National Committee. Maybe even some state election systems? So we gotta step up our game. Make sure we are well defended and make sure we are able to take the fight to those who go after us. As president I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses.“
YouTube video
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/daily-kos/You were saying? Also great job ignoring the actual point i was making which you completely missed while desperately searching for anything to fit your agenda. 👆
I wonder how easy you'll throw out a fox news article if it also merely presented the facts. Double standards ftw!
You missed this part:
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
. . . the Daily Kos article merely presented information aggregated from other news sites, which are cited in the body of the article. You would know that if you actually read it.
You missed this part:
No no, I didn't miss it. Hence my post regarding fox news and double standards 👆
You missed this, though:
If wikileaks "ruined" its reputation in any way, the polls wouldn't be moving the way they are. The only reputation that's being ruined is Hilary's.Here's another newsflash. Wikileaks was already known as a whistleblower website when Snowden came out. Good try though
As far as Powell is concerned, it would be hypocritical not to mention him. If he was running for president, I would criticize him as well. However, this looks even WORSE for Hilary. By saying "well someone else told me to do it so I did it", she's essentially proving everyone's point about her incompetence. I suppose we'll see more shifting in the polls after a few more days. Once again, hypocritical for Powell and the Republicans (politicians are hypocrites, surprised?), even worse for Hilary.
Also:
It just keeps getting worse each passing day 👆
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
House Democrats Release Emails Between Colin Powell and Hillary Clinton Showing Advice He Gave Her😎
Where did he say to send classified material non secured in that exchange?
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
No no, I didn't miss it. Hence my post regarding fox news and double standards 👆You missed this, though:
So lets try this again.
If wikileaks had indeed lost credibility or was known as a whistleblower (which has been evident for years, way to miss the boat), Hilary's lead wouldn't be cut in half.. Soooo.. Who exactly did they lose credibility with? Cher? Barbara Streisand? lol.As far as Powell is concerned, it would be hypocritical not to mention him. If he was running for president, I would criticize him as well. However, this looks even WORSE for Hilary. By saying "well someone else told me to do it so I did it", she's essentially proving everyone's point about her incompetence. I suppose we'll see more shifting in the polls after a few more days. Once again, hypocritical for Powell and the Republicans (politicians are hypocrites, surprised?), even worse for Hilary.
Also:
It just keeps getting worse each passing day 👆
👆
Sick Hillary has a full time ambulance and medical staff following her around. The EMS workers are also in body armor.
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
No no, I didn't miss it. Hence my post regarding fox news and double standards 👆You missed this, though:
I did not miss anything. You made a claim and did not substantiate it. Do you have a relevant example of me summarily dismissing an article aggregated from other news sites because it was posted on Fox News? So much for double-standards.
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
So lets try this again.
If wikileaks had indeed lost credibility or was known as a whistleblower (which has been evident for years, way to miss the boat), Hilary's lead wouldn't be cut in half.. Soooo.. Who exactly did they lose credibility with? Cher? Barbara Streisand? lol.
The Intercept, UC Berkely, lawyers, The New York Times, University of Florida Levin College of Law, computer scientists, Wired, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, sociologists, et al. You know, people who care if the personal information and medical records of child rape victims, and the identities of LGBT people in countries in which homosexuality is a capital crime, are posted to the internet. People who do not support their antisemitic Tweets; or their anti-American, serial rapist founder who is hiding out in an authoritarian country to avoid prosecution. So basically anyone with a pulse.
As I already noted, the previous leak was released during the convention, and did not derail her nomination. What we are seeing now is consistent with a historical decline from a post-convention bounce, and does not coincide with a leak in any way.
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
As far as Powell is concerned, it would be hypocritical not to mention him. If he was running for president, I would criticize him as well. However, this looks even WORSE for Hilary. By saying "well someone else told me to do it so I did it", she's essentially proving everyone's point about her incompetence. I suppose we'll see more shifting in the polls after a few more days. Once again, hypocritical for Powell and the Republicans (politicians are hypocrites, surprised?), even worse for Hilary.
Quite the opposite. What it shows is that she behaved in a way that is identical to her Republican predecessor, at his suggestion no less, and it is consistent with historical norms. The sky did not fall when Powell and Rice did it, and it did not fall when Clinton followed in their footsteps. It is much ado about nothing.
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Also:It just keeps getting worse each passing day 👆
He was granted immunity before he was interviewed in the investigation that is already over. So what?