Originally posted by Beniboybling
@Ares, his wording implies parity, but that's obviously not the case seeing as Vader lost to Ahsoka, and Filoni has stated (the obvious) that she would lose a confrontation with Sidious.
Simply because she lost does not indicate there is no parity between the two (though I certainly don’t think there is).
Ashoka performed admirably against Vader - for what mostly was a struggle match for both - on Malachor. The famed nexus arguments can be put forth that would have benefited him throughout the match and supposedly weakened Ashoka. Sidious vs Tano a is going to be one sided, but she might be able to replicate this, for example :
Now for the people - inevitably Sidious fans - balking at this Filioni quote, no one's putting a gun to your head here. You don't have to take authorial intent at face value. There's enough modern literacy criticism to fight that notion - Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' Death of the Author Essay. I suggest you read them.
Originally posted by ZiggystardustFor once I agree.
Ashoka performed admirably against Vader - for what mostly was a struggle match for both - on Malachor. The famed nexus arguments can be put forth that would have benefited him throughout the match and supposedly weakened Ashoka. Sidious vs Tano a is going to be one sided, but she might be able to replicate this, for example :Now for the people - inevitably Sidious fans - balking at this Filioni quote, no one's putting a gun to your head here. You don't have to take authorial intent at face value. There's enough modern literacy criticism to fight that notion - Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' Death of the Author Essay. I suggest you read them.