Originally posted by h1a8So you just admitted you didn't read the op and have gone at length to debate said topic.m you're guilt of trolling. Reread my posts, troll. They have the answers you seek.
No guns? Then what chance does Kahn have? They start 100 yards away. Palpatine can choke him, electrocute him, lift him and slam him etc.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiStrength and power when being concrete in a debate have different criteria.
No it's strength moron. If he can lift something, no matter how, then he can lift something. It's like claiming that somebody uses normal technique to bench 300 pounds, another guy uses his mind to lift 1000 pounds. Does it matter that it is unconventional and defies physics to do so? No, it doesn't. All that matters is, if somebody asks him how much he can lift... the answer would be 1000 pounds.So again, how is Khan stronger? Back up your claim with a feat that matches the twirling senate pods feat or the x-wing feat.
Palpatine's strength failed to break free of Vader's death grip. Khan crushes a skull. Boom. Greater than picking up an old man and tossing him. That was all the strength required to best the geriatric.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112You have no defense against the argument of being choked, picked up with the force and slammed, etc. Trolling is done intentionally.
So you just admitted you didn't read the op and have gone at length to debate said topic.m you're guilt of trolling. Reread my posts, troll. They have the answers you seek.
Originally posted by h1a8So you're saying you're so inept you're never guilty of trolling ? Hahahahaha.
You have no defense against the argument of being choked, picked up with the force and slammed, etc. Trolling is done intentionally.
Khan closes the distance based on how Palpatine handles unarmed opponents. You ain't Palpatine but you already said you can't be trusted to read an op. That should be the first thing you do when you click on a new topic, trainwreck.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Strength and power when being concrete in a debate have different criteria.Palpatine's strength failed to break free of Vader's death grip. Khan crushes a skull. Boom. Greater than picking up an old man and tossing him. That was all the strength required to best the geriatric.
😂
They are not a different "Criteria" Either you can lift a 1000 pound object or you can't. There is no middle ground. It doesn't matter if he can lift it with his arms... legs... mind.. or Johnson... he can lift 1000 pounds. Therefore, when you say Khan is stronger, you'll have to prove that. Show me a feat from Khan superior to the Senate pod feat and the xwing feat
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiIf you can with tk that has nothing to do with the physical strength of your muscles. Just because you don't understand the simple definitions and applications of said terminology doesn't mean we don't as well. What's worse you try to make everything black or white by limiting it to two options which shows a lack of emotional maturity on your end. 😂
They are not a different "Criteria" Either you can lift a 1000 pound object or you can't. There is no middle ground. It doesn't matter if he can lift it with his arms... legs... mind.. or Johnson... he can lift 1000 pounds. Therefore, when you say Khan is stronger, you'll have to prove that. Show me a feat from Khan superior to the Senate pod feat and the xwing feat
Khan crushes a head. Palpatine couldn't break free from a hand and a stump. Khan is a lot stronger. Point proven. Let the hilarity of your nonsensical posts continue.
Originally posted by quanchi112Palpatine handles none force users from 100 yards away by USING THE FORCE.
So you're saying you're so inept you're never guilty of trolling ? Hahahahaha.Khan closes the distance based on how Palpatine handles unarmed opponents. You ain't Palpatine but you already said you can't be trusted to read an op. That should be the first thing you do when you click on a new topic, trainwreck.
Do you really think Palpatine will sit there and wait for Khan to get close and willingly let him harm him? You are making no sense.
Originally posted by h1a8Based on which examples ?
Palpatine handles none force users from 100 yards away by USING THE FORCE.Do you really think Palpatine will sit there and wait for Khan to get close and willingly let him harm him? You are making no sense.
You made a claim so support it. If you don't then it's trolling, amigo.
I await your desperate decision.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
He's just trolling you saying it's not in character for him to do that:?v=-7hBZNsPnyg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7hBZNsPnyg
Starting at 0:35 he walks through 2 Mandalorian warriors force choking them.. Then at 1:02 he pins 2 more Mandalorians high up on the wall choking them out, before even walking into the room himself! Then finally at 1:46 he begins his fight against Maul and Opress by Force Pinning (and crushing) them against the wall. And that's against 2 Powerful Force warriors. What he's facing in Khan is just 1 opponent and one who has no resistance to the Force.
He does let them go and fight them in Sabers for unknown reasons. But even then he ENDS his FIRST fight with Maul by KO'ing him with TK in the middle of the Saber fight at 2:45.
Then after killing Maul's brother and waiting for Maul to regain conciousness he fights Maul again. And at the end of his 2ND fight with @4:25 he just tosses Maul around like he's nothing.
This whole fight is Canon to the movies btw.
This is why Quanchi is obsessed over me. I've made a fool out of him too many times 😆
As I said, Khan gets casually choked out while Sidious is looking in the other direction reading the morning paper 😎
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Originally posted by quanchi112Refuted.
So when in the same room he lets the mandalorians aim their weapons before he force chokes. They did not shoot. This proves my point he doesn't do this right out of the gate.Secondly he attacks two guards before being in the same room which is irrelevant to a fight in which two combatants start in the same location.
We see Maul fight on despite the tk attacks. He doesn't press any advantage over Maul. Maul also doesn't have the resilience or the cellular regeneration of Khan making it an unfair comparison. Try to be relevant here, d. Troll.
Khan guns him down. In every instance save the one in which the guards weren't in the same room he's never ko'd anyone in this fashion. That's irrelevant to this fight since they are in the same room. We see how slow Palpatine has been to attack. Khan wins.
If an injured slower guy with one hand can do it so can Khan.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on which examples ?You made a claim so support it. If you don't then it's trolling, amigo.
I await your desperate decision.
It's common sense. Why wouldn't he use his force powers on a non force user? No examples are needed. His character is to kill with his powers.
Are you suggesting that he will never use his powers in this fight?
Originally posted by h1a8
It's common sense. Why wouldn't he use his force powers on a non force user? No examples are needed. His character is to kill with his powers.Are you suggesting that he will never use his powers in this fight?
If you have no examples then you aren't debating the characters themselves. That's why you never debate worth a damn as you just make things up. Opinion based debating is stupid, dumbass.
Originally posted by quanchi112
If you can with tk that has nothing to do with the physical strength of your muscles. Just because you don't understand the simple definitions and applications of said terminology doesn't mean we don't as well. What's worse you try to make everything black or white by limiting it to two options which shows a lack of emotional maturity on your end. 😂Khan crushes a head. Palpatine couldn't break free from a hand and a stump. Khan is a lot stronger. Point proven. Let the hilarity of your nonsensical posts continue.
You're a buffoon, and one of the worst poster on this site. How does that make you feel clownshoes? All that matters is results. If somebody asks 2 people, which one of you can lift this object, one person tries to lift it normally and fails... another tries to with his Johnson and succeeds.... Well... He's proves stronger. Them just the facts ma'am.
Function is the single most important thing. If Sids has proven he can toss around objects that weight vastly more than Khan, then he'll have no issue slamming him all over the place. To which Khan will have no answer for. Sids crushes, and frankly, Khan would utterly curbed.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiIt is the worst "posters" not poster for that sentence to make sense. I don't take anything you say seriously. I feel great mocking you while correcting your sub par sentence structure.
You're a buffoon, and one of the worst poster on this site. How does that make you feel clownshoes? All that matters is results. If somebody asks 2 people, which one of you can lift this object, one person tries to lift it normally and fails... another tries to with his Johnson and succeeds.... Well... He's proves stronger. Them just the facts ma'am.Function is the single most important thing. If Sids has proven he can toss around objects that weight vastly more than Khan, then he'll have no issue slamming him all over the place. To which Khan will have no answer for. Sids crushes, and frankly, Khan would utterly curbed.
One has to do with physical strength one doesn't ? Colossus is stronger than Prof X but Prof X has powers outside physical strength. That's how debating is done not some below civilized black and white version of reality.
False comparison. He did have problems with Vader. So like I said once a khan grabs ahold of him he's done for. Based off your logic he could easily grab Yoda who weighs even less than Khan. You sank your own battleship.
How does that make you feel, loser ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Itnis worst "posters" not poster for that sentence to make sense. I don't take anything you say seriously. I feel great mocking you while correcting your sub par sentence structure.One has to do with physical strength one doesn't ? Colossus is stronger than Prof X but Prof X has powers outside physical strength. That's how debating is done not some below civilized black and white version of reality.
False comparison. He did have problems with Vader. So like I said once a khan grabs ahold of him he's done for. Based off your logic he could easily grab Yoda who weighs even less than Khan. You sank your own battleship.
How does that make you feel, loser ?
BWAHAHA, somebody corrects somebody, and in the very sentence they correct somebody they say Itnis LMAO. Thanks for proving what a tool you really are.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiYou edited my quote like an idiot. You also failed to refute my points which is an actual concession.
BWAHAHA, somebody corrects somebody, and in the very sentence they correct somebody they say Itnis LMAO. Thanks for proving what a tool you really are.
Khan wins, *****.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Itnis worst "posters" not poster for that sentence to make sense. I don't take anything you say seriously. I feel great mocking you while correcting your sub par sentence structure.One has to do with physical strength one doesn't ? Colossus is stronger than Prof X but Prof X has powers outside physical strength. That's how debating is done not some below civilized black and white version of reality.
False comparison. He did have problems with Vader. So like I said once a khan grabs ahold of him he's done for. Based off your logic he could easily grab Yoda who weighs even less than Khan. You sank your own battleship.
How does that make you feel, loser ?
I love when you think you make a point, when in fact, you just made yourself look like an idiot. Again it's your lack of source material that does you in. Of course Sids would have no issue lifting the weight of Yoda, as it is less the Khan. The different is, and why you are continually laughed at for being atrocious at debating, Yoda has ACTIVE defenses for that. He can resist it vai the force, where as Khan, has zero defense for it. Game, set, own a clown
Huge difference is, again, Sids was DISTRACTED dealing with Luke... and then ANOTHER POWERFUL FORCE USER, caught him by surprise and did that. I know you're painfully unaware of Star Wars, but that didn't even kill him buffoon lol. Further, Sids isn't distracted here. He's only dealing with Khan. Which is why it's so funny and exemplifies how bad you're at this, when you cite an irrelevant example to this fight. Sids won't be focused elsewhere. He'll be curbing Khan directly, and there isn't a damn thing he can do about it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You edited my quote like an idiot. You also failed to refute my points which is an actual concession.Khan wins, *****.
Liar... You've been caught in ANOTHER lie. I did no such edit to your post and you know it. How does it make you feel like I just made you lie, in front of everybody, to try and cover up your stupidity. Notice how at the bottom of your quote is says EDITED.. and the time stamp... that was AFTER I made my post. God damn you're stupid. Owning you is so easy liar boy.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiBased off what does he have active defenses to this ? Provide source material to back your claim. Mmy claims have been proven yours haven't.
I love when you think you make a point, when in fact, you just made yourself look like an idiot. Again it's your lack of source material that does you in. Of course Sids would have no issue lifting the weight of Yoda, as it is less the Khan. The different is, and why you are continually laughed at for being atrocious at debating, Yoda has ACTIVE defenses for that. He can resist it vai the force, where as Khan, has zero defense for it. Game, set, own a clownHuge difference is, again, Sids was DISTRACTED dealing with Luke... and then ANOTHER POWERFUL FORCE USER, caught him by surprise and did that. I know you're painfully unaware of Star Wars, but that didn't even kill him buffoon lol. Further, Sids isn't distracted here. He's only dealing with Khan. Which is why it's so funny and exemplifies how bad you're at this, when you cite an irrelevant example to this fight. Sids won't be focused elsewhere. He'll be curbing Khan directly, and there isn't a damn thing he can do about it.
The force works against anyone who gets struck by it. Prove otherwise. Why didn't Sidious use the force to overpower Vader ? That's an example proving your theory incorrect.
Luke wasn't attacking him. He clearly had multiple seconds to react. He was simply overpowered. Game, set, match.
Sidious was only dealing with Yoda and lost sight of him while he was just jumping pods. Another one on one fight in which Sidious can't focus on just one opponent.
😂
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Liar... You've been caught in ANOTHER lie. I did no such edit to your post and you know it. How does it make you feel like I just made you lie, in front of everybody, to try and cover up your stupidity. Notice how at the bottom of your quote is says EDITED.. and the time stamp... that was AFTER I made my post. God damn you're stupid. Owning you is so easy liar boy.
😂
What a Tool