Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn[b]This went on for 10 MINUTES with both at a standstill
An extended battle and Savage Banner is left looking like Beanie Sigel.
The Black Man TRIUMPHS yet again
Savage Hulk didn't surpass any of these opponents dramatically in strength. [/B]
I'm not sure about the context of the first 2 scans presented but based on the presentation of the last one I question them.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
How ferocious did he look in the scans I just posted, dolt?
Namor had a clear advantage in those scans due to being in the water. On land, he isn't on Hulk level. Also, Hulk has had at least 8 upgrades since then and Namor himself admitted RECENTLY that he can not beat Hulk.
The Thor showing, Jesus. Do I need to post 3 showings of Superman to determine his entire history? Is that what you want.
Originally posted by carver9
After that punch, he one shot koed Black Bolt with a single hit.
Originally posted by carver9
Namor had a clear advantage in those scans due to being in the water. On land, he isn't on Hulk level. Also, Hulk has had at least 8 upgrades since then and Namor himself admitted RECENTLY that he can not beat Hulk.The Thor showing, Jesus. Do I need to post 3 showings of Superman to determine his entire history? Is that what you want.
Do you require MORE, Gammite?
SUBMIT NOW!!!!!
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Are you familiar with Hulk, or did you just look him up during you viewing of this thread? It's hard for me to believe you are this goddamn ignorant.
I am the KING OF CANON and as such I know all about Savage Banner.
1) Default strength- Savage Hulk clearly starts at 75-90 that is undeniable if you've ACTUALLY READ the canon.
2) Dynamic strength- While the hallmark of the character; the application thereof isn't as rapid as most Gammites claim.
3) Combat- In a myriad of scenarios against friends, foes, and perfect strangers the amping of Savage Banner's strength has been consistent enough to support my claim.
Of course, being the PATHETIC FOOL that you are you will provide no substantive counter for ANY of the points I just made. Instead you will show your stupidity with a feeble ad hominem response.
Originally posted by tkitna
Not at all. I'm just saying she isnt coming in here and one shotting him. He would be at her level or more in a shorter time than most are contemplating.
WW, who can lift millions of tons, can't one-shot Hulk at 100 tons?
She's a trillion times faster than him and doesn't mind killing. She's snap his neck in a second.
Originally posted by EcstaticGrace
Why would Hulk enter stages that weren't even evented at the time?
That just shows it takes a very specific set of circumstances to lead to him going WBH/WWH mode. He wouldn't do it again Spiderman if he cracked a yo mama joke, for example.
Where does the Illuminati storyline fit in with Doc Green?
I'm a little confused as to whom and what people are arguing for/against here.
I'm seeing every variation of Wonder Woman being used here from at least 2005 to the present and Hulk all the way back from the 1960s till now. Including alternate versions and crossover versions, which are, arguably the same thing.
If we're going by the KMC guideline of "most recent incarnation, unless otherwise specified", then, presumably, this is DCnU Wonder Woman?
That version of Wonder Woman is inherently more ruthless than the one featured in 2005's "Sacrifice" storyline. And her weapons are actually formed from her bracers, not including, of course, her lasso. If we're removing all weapons from her in any practical sense, that means removing her bracers. Which actually gives her a significant power boost. I don't see Savage Hulk as I've classically seen him depicted surviving THAT version of Wonder Woman. That version of Wonder Woman WOULD be likely to snap an opponent's neck, as she almost did to the goddess Artemis before Apollo bargained with her for his sister's life. She'd certainly not have much hesitation doing that to an opponent who looks like some green Greek monster.
More on this later. Maybe.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I'm a little confused as to whom and what people are arguing for/against here.I'm seeing every variation of Wonder Woman being used here from at least 2005 to the present and Hulk all the way back from the 1960s till now. Including alternate versions and crossover versions, which are, arguably the same thing.
If we're going by the KMC guideline of "most recent incarnation, unless otherwise specified", then, presumably, this is DCnU Wonder Woman?
That version of Wonder Woman is inherently more ruthless than the one featured in 2005's "Sacrifice" storyline. And her weapons are actually formed from her bracers, not including, of course, her lasso. If we're removing all weapons from her in any practical sense, that means removing her bracers. Which actually gives her a significant power boost. I don't see Savage Hulk as I've classically seen him depicted surviving THAT version of Wonder Woman. That version of Wonder Woman WOULD be likely to snap an opponent's neck, as she almost did to the goddess Artemis before Apollo bargained with her for his sister's life. She'd certainly not have much hesitation doing that to an opponent who looks like some green Greek monster.
More on this later. Maybe.
I don't understand your confusion in regard to the depiction of the Banner in question.
"Savage Hulk" is a very specific version of the character. All of the scans and references I've made toward the character have been in relation to what the opening post called for.
Originally posted by krisblaze
WW, who can lift millions of tons, can't one-shot Hulk at 100 tons?She's a trillion times faster than him and doesn't mind killing. She's snap his neck in a second.
So by your logic, WW is stronger than practically every Marvel character that has faced the Hulk including Thor and Hercules and not by just a little, but by a monumental margin? Like i've said earlier, Hulk has been taken down on a few rare occasions, but as a comic norm, it doesnt happen. Its not happening here either.