Why "America first"?

Started by Gorilla6 pages
Originally posted by Nephthys
Ironic, coming from an American.

...whose family immigrated to America at some point as well
LOL double standards

Oh look the dumb gorilla showed up. Has nothing else to do I guess.

Why are you saying immigration is destroying the world?

Because he's a rancid bowl of prawn juice masquerading as a human.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Because he's a rancid bowl of prawn juice masquerading as a human.

👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial YouTube video
nuff said
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Because he's a rancid bowl of prawn juice masquerading as a human.

I must have picked up that disease from Canada, seems a lot of that is going around up there in the place no one cares about. We like Mexico more then we do Canada down here. At least the Mexicans want work.

Originally posted by Gorilla
...whose family immigrated to America at some point as well
LOL double standards

So we get it, he said immigration was bad, but had ancestors that immigrated.

So if he had ancestors that were slave owners and he said slavery is bad..is that a double standard too?

Originally posted by Surtur
So we get it, he said immigration was bad, but had ancestors that immigrated.

So if he had ancestors that were slave owners and he said slavery is bad..is that a double standard too?

😂

#owned

Originally posted by Surtur
So we get it, he said immigration was bad, but had ancestors that immigrated.

So if he had ancestors that were slave owners and he said slavery is bad..is that a double standard too?

Are you saying that people immigrating into America, and founding the US, was a bad thing?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Are you saying that people immigrating into America, and founding the US, was a bad thing?

I simply was wondering if we apply the genius logic of "you best agree with the shit your ancestors did" to everything or not.

To answer your question no I don't think it was a bad idea. But you see the world was a vastly different place at that time.

Originally posted by Surtur
To answer your question no I don't think it was a bad idea. But you see the world was a vastly different place at that time.
That's what I said about gun rights 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
That's what I said about gun rights 😖hifty:

Which would also be true: when the 2nd amendment was written the country was a vastly different place.

There was a time when this country desperately needed immigrants so of course we welcomed them with open arms.

Originally posted by Surtur
I simply was wondering if we apply the genius logic of "you best agree with the shit your ancestors did" to everything or not.

To answer your question no I don't think it was a bad idea. But you see the world was a vastly different place at that time.

But seeing as you appear to agree in this case with "the shit your ancestors" did, that makes the comparison rather faulty. If you approved of the slavery committed by your ancestors and then came out saying slavery today was bad, you would be a hypocrite yes.

That immigration is no longer viable in today's world is a different point entirely. But what do you mean by that anyway?

So immigration makes sense when we dont have the jobs for the people that are currently living here?

Time will tell if George Friedman was right or not. He argued that as this century wears on, and Western birth rates plummet, we'll be fighting over immigrants just to maintain our own numbers.

Roy Beck>Freidman

Glenn Beck>Elmo.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
But seeing as you appear to agree in this case with "the shit your ancestors" did, that makes the comparison rather faulty. If you approved of the slavery committed by your ancestors and then came out saying slavery today was bad, you would be a hypocrite yes.

But it doesn't make the comparison faulty because I'm talking about how in general this logic is f*cking stupid. Because your ancestors immigrated here doesn't mean you need to be okay with immigration as it currently is. It by no means makes one hypocritical.

That immigration is no longer viable in today's world is a different point entirely. But what do you mean by that anyway?

My point is the situation isn't so black and white that it's valid to say "well we are a nation of immigrants" as *any* kind of defense against someone talking against immigration.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So immigration makes sense when we dont have the jobs for the people that are currently living here?
Hold on TI, you said immigration was destroying the world - seems like you are against the concept in general.