Revan vs Anakin Skywalker (No TP)

Started by SunRazer3 pages

Revan vs Anakin Skywalker (No TP)

Anakin is in a sound state of mind.

1. Sabers

2. Force

3. All-out

Fight takes place on Rekkiad. Who wins?

Revan takes all but Sabers, even then it's still a good fight

So, like just after Dooku koed Kenobi?
Anakin in all, but maybe Force, then.

How about Anakin when he started getting serious in that fight? Not enraged serious, but pretty serious.

When he ws serious in the fight, in your opinion?
Really enraged he gets, after he kicked Dooku, imo.

I said he's not enraged. If you want a moment in the novel, then about the time he starts using Djem So instead of Shien.

Originally posted by SunRazer
How about Anakin when he started getting serious in that fight? Not enraged serious, but pretty serious.

That Anakin wins, tbh.

The Anakin we see fighting the magnaguards, dealing with battle droids on the way to Dooku, during the end of OCW, etc., takes sabers but loses Force and all-out.

Is there a reason to assume that this Anakin would take Force? Revan's mastery and versatility in the Force remain central aspects of the fight.

Hmm....yeah, Anakin wins.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Is there a reason to assume that this Anakin would take Force? Revan's mastery and versatility in the Force remain central aspects of the fight.

Anakin below Zonakin loses Force, but the getting-serious one takes all-out IMHO.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Is there a reason to assume that this Anakin would take Force? Revan's mastery and versatility in the Force remain central aspects of the fight.

Anakins more powerful, tho.
Like I said, I am not sure about Force only.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Anakin below Zonakin loses Force, but the getting-serious one takes all-out IMHO.

The getting serious one isn't Zonakin.

The force advantage is still overrated. If you have X taking Sabers and y taking force, it's not an even split. It's like the Starkiller versus battles, he should get outclassed by Kenobi tier Duelists very convincingly but everyone thinks he'll just fcking spam force pushes, like wtf?

Originally posted by SunRazer
The getting serious one isn't Zonakin.

He said that serious Anakin would take all-out, but not force; while Zonakin wins all.

^ yeah.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
The force advantage is still overrated. If you have X take Sabers and y take force, it's not an even split. It's like the Starkiller versus battles, he should get outclassed by Kenobi tier Duelists very convincingly but everyone thinks he'll just fcking spam force pushes, like wtf?

It really varies with the medium. It seems to make sense that a sufficient Force advantage would just be tactically superior to being better with a blade by a comparable margin, but that also depends on how difficult you think it is to launch successful Force attacks.

Blade attacks are generally much easier to make than Force attacks, hence why in close-combat, superior skill tends to trump superior power, provided that both disparities are similar and the Force advantage is not vast (which would allow one to end the fight immediately).

Originally posted by SunRazer
Blade attacks are generally much easier to make than Force attacks,

Yeah, but their range is limited.

If you look at the extreme, like an insta-kill level saber advantage vs. an insta-kill level Force advantage, the latter would win in all but the closest starting distances for the same reason a guy with a drawn gun usually beats a guy with a sword.

If the disparity is smaller, then it becomes more debatable.


hence why in close-combat, superior skill tends to trump superior power, provided that both disparities are similar and not vast.

Well, not when you consider the contribution of that power to precog and augmentation. In that case, power seems to be at least as important.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Revan takes all but Sabers, even then it's still a good fight

@Ell - As I said, if both advantages are vast, then the one superior in the Force will win, as they have no need to get in close in the first place. Otherwise, assuming the advantages are about equal, the one that's better at dueling will usually triumph.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Otherwise, assuming the advantages are about equal, the one that's better at dueling will usually triumph.

I'm not sure if that's true though.