If not Trump and not Clinton

Originally posted by riv6672
^^^That would NOT be boring!
your new sig looks great, BTW.

Speaking of looks, this entire page just looks hilarious to me.

Everybody needs to stay on topic.

Originally posted by Facee
Let's say you don't like either presidential candidate. Who would you like see as president?

Trey Gowdy or Jeanine Pirro would've been good.

Lex Luthor.

You just like the letter L.

Originally posted by Robtard
Because Trump hasn't won.

When I called Sanders "troll-like", I meant his appearance and it was done in an amicable fashion.

Yeah and the strange this is..if Trump does something that happened 20 years ago it will be headline news.(Trump lost a lot of money in 1995!!!!!)

But I pretty much haven't heard any real explanations given as to why Hilary or her aides smashed up 13 blackberries with a hammer.

In your opinion: what reason do you feel a career politician running for president who has come under fire with an email scandal..would have her aides take a hammer to 13 blackberries?

I think the bigger question is, who's pulling the strings? Is it Hillary or Trump?

I'm still curious as to the explanation for why they would destroy 13 blackberries.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm still curious as to the explanation for why they would destroy 13 blackberries.

They did not destroy 13 Blackberries, they destroyed two. And they did so, because it is the security policy of the State Department that when an electronic device is retired, it should have its data wiped, and its drive physically destroyed.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
They did not destroy 13 Blackberries, they destroyed two. And they did so, because it is the security policy of the State Department that when an electronic device is retired, it should have its data wiped, and its drive physically destroyed.

So the reports that it was far more than 2 are also lies?

Originally posted by Surtur
So the reports that it was far more than 2 are also lies?

Those same reports imply that there is something unscrupulous about complying with State Department security policy with regard to electronic devices to further an anti-Clinton agenda, so you do the math.

Well the only thing I would say that would make sense to be upset over it is if they destroyed the devices without sharing the data on them first.

If the data was shared, then they wiped, then they destroyed it..yes, that really shouldn't be an issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rpm4rjejFgQ

This is kinda funny.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Those same reports imply that there is something unscrupulous about complying with State Department security policy with regard to electronic devices to further an anti-Clinton agenda, so you do the math.

But hey you seem to have an answer for every single potentially shady thing these people do, so perhaps you can explain why Obama was emailing her under a pseudonym on an email he said he didn't know about?

It's possible he didn't know the email he was responding to was the one she lied about, but I'm still curious as to why the pseudonym then. Is this standard operating procedure?

I'd wait for the media to explain it, but you see Trump was vulgar and shit to women so this story will get lost in the shuffle because..vulgar, you see.

Originally posted by Surtur
But hey you seem to have an answer for every single potentially shady thing these people do, so perhaps you can explain why Obama was emailing her under a pseudonym on an email he said he didn't know about?

It's possible he didn't know the email he was responding to was the one she lied about, but I'm still curious as to why the pseudonym then. Is this standard operating procedure?

I'd wait for the media to explain it, but you see Trump was vulgar and shit to women so this story will get lost in the shuffle because..vulgar, you see.

It is a State Department security measure to protect the email addresses of cabinet secretaries and select administration officials.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRogXTFtpUc

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is a State Department security measure to protect the email addresses of cabinet secretaries and select administration officials.

I see, so they use pseudonym's 100% of the time, then?

Originally posted by Its2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRogXTFtpUc

It's nice, but irrelevant. Words>>Actions. It's why people see Hilary as the lesser evil, they go by the words.

Im actually curious about this as well. Why did Obama use a pseudonym when talking to Clinton? What did Clinton actually say in her emails and why is she passing the buck whenever its mentioned? Trump may have questioned Obama's birthplace, but hes admitted he was wrong. Why has Clinton deleted her emails, and why is she so awkward when she talks about it? What exactly is going on?

Basically when she claims they turned over like 95% of her emails and then Trey Gowdy points out no it was actually less than 1%..that right there should have been the end of it. She's lying, and badly. She wasn't only a little bit off, but WAY off. It should have been the end for any chance at her becoming president.

Not only does she more or less get away with it, but some of her staff members are getting these sweet little immunity deals as well.

So if she wins the Presidency, we are essentially giving her a thumbs up when it comes to this behavior. If she can do all this and still become president than she can pretty much do whatever she wants.

People say Trump can get away with saying whatever he wants? Well ha f*ck that silly ass notion since these recent audio tapes show he can't, but Hilary gets away with shady actions, Trump gets away with shady words.

I only really know of her doing shady shit in Syria and Libya, especially the latter. This is kinda important, its a big deal. We know the Bushes were heavily involved in the middle east and its apparent that the Clintons and Bushes know each other and are part of the same circle. Is voting Clinton like having Jeb? Because thats what it feels like.