Originally posted by Surtur
No nerve struck. You're not very good at reading peoples intentions on the internet, are you? I can't blame you, after all..how can you know what someone is truly feeling?
Well whenever you come up with a comeback for how you can rant about SJW's being mean towards rich privileged people but then do the exact same thing towards Kim, and based on far less justification, get back to me.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Well whenever you come up with a comeback for how you can rant about SJW's being mean towards rich privileged people but then do the exact same thing towards Kim, and based on far less justification, get back to me.
So when did I rant about this? Which SJW's were I pissed at for being mean to rich d-bags?
Originally posted by Surtur
Awesome! If you heard it..it MUST be the truth.
Are you mentally disabled? I literally said immediately after that I don't actually know.
The thing is..nobody was outraged here, nobody was angry. Not truly angry. I was merely using those questions to illustrate a point as to why people might react this way to celebrities. It doesn't mean Kim specifically was able to dodge a speeding ticket, that was..an example. I figured the overall point would have been clear, but apparently it wasn't so that is my fault, I forgot sometimes I need to slowly spell out stuff here.
No you weren't lol. Don't lie. There was nothing to misinterpret, you made your thoughts very clear.
"They want to play the "I'm only human like the rest of you" shit when stuff goes wrong, but for the rest of the time? They think they are better than us, they think they are above us."
This is a declarative and absolute statement on both her and other celebrities' characters. There is no room for interpretation. You are stating this as a fact, not saying that "oh some people think that not that I necessarily do". I don't give a **** what your alleged intention was. If you couldn't get your meaning across that is solely your own fault due to how you wrote it. Improve your ability to convey your thoughts in writing if this isn't what you meant.
I was asking his opinion on if he thinks those things have ever happened. It was more or less just pointing out if he thinks she has ever taken advantage of her celebrity to walk over other people.
And you outright stated she and apparently all or many celebrities have. 👆
But hey discussion over, after all..you heard she was nice IRL, and you posted a funny pic to boot, you clever rascal!/thread.
Why are you acting so childish and butthurt in your response to me?
And the thing you said that the picture responded to was one of the most hilariously edgy things I've ever read, though I acknowledge that might have actually been a joke. If so, good job! It made me laugh.
It is neat having my own personal troll.
I mean this person calling anyone mentally disabled makes as much sense as Hilary Clinton calling someone a lying sack of shit. It makes as much sense as Trump saying to someone "you know..your hair looks kinda funny".
Whenever I see a topic that says the latest response was from Nemebro? I know that it's her/he/it replying to me. This person also doesn't post here a lot so it's almost like the shittiest bear ever coming out of hibernation.
I still wish she/he/it had the funny troll hair:
It's kinda cute, right?
Originally posted by SurturYou can complain and whine about me being a troll all you want, and you can even refuse to address my points because you're too stupid and cowardly to do so, but doing these things won't change the fact that I am right and you are wrong. 👇
It is neat having my own personal troll.I mean this person calling anyone mentally disabled makes as much sense as Hilary Clinton calling someone a lying sack of shit. It makes as much sense as Trump saying to someone "you know..your hair looks kinda funny".
Whenever I see a topic that says the latest response was from Nemebro? I know that it's her/he/it replying to me. This person also doesn't post here a lot so it's almost like the shittiest bear ever coming out of hibernation.
I still wish she/he/it had the funny troll hair:
It's kinda cute, right?
The difference between me insulting your intelligence and you insulting mine is that when I did so it was in response to you trying to illustrate a point I had already made (that I don't personally know if Kim Kardashian is nice), and completely backing out of addressing the point like the coward you are. 👇
Can you explain to me why you feel anyone would want to engage in any kind of discussion with you if..when they explain what they meant by a certain statement, you feel you can just say "nah, you didn't mean that".
So, why would anyone want to engage you? No, of course I didn't mean every single celebrity has taken advantage of their celebrity status. I'm hazard to guess a lot have, and probably Kim specifically has. Do I know this for sure? No, but then I never really said I did.
So yes, for this:
""They want to play the "I'm only human like the rest of you" shit when stuff goes wrong, but for the rest of the time? They think they are better than us, they think they are above us."
The "they" was celebrities in general. So if you come back and try to "lol no, I'm right you're wrong" then you will kinda show why nobody really wants to engage with you. You can certainly interpret it and then I can correct you or not, but you certainly don't just get to override my explanation for something. Or well you surely can do that, but then it makes no sense to whine like a little b*tch when your comments aren't specifically responded to.
So now I've explained what I meant. You are of course free to believe it or free to disbelieve it, but if you choose the latter route remember: there will literally be no valid reason for continued discourse, because we'd just go around in circles. Surely someone as vastly intelligent as yourself could comprehend this, despite whatever you might believe about me. So I guess..time will tell and we'll just see exactly how you respond.
Originally posted by Surtur
Can you explain to me why you feel anyone would want to engage in any kind of discussion with you if..when they explain what they meant by a certain statement, you feel you can just say "nah, you didn't mean that".
What you meant didn't matter when I was responding to you friend. I was responding to what you said, and what you said was apparently very different than what you "meant", and like a coward you tried to play it out like I was slow for misunderstanding you, when I misunderstood nothing about your post. I perfectly understood what was written. As I said, if what you wrote is not what you meant, that is entirely your own failing. Not mine.
So, why would anyone want to engage you? No, of course I didn't mean every single celebrity has taken advantage of their celebrity status. I'm hazard to guess a lot have, and probably Kim specifically has. Do I know this for sure? No, but then I never really said I did.
Well no, you actually did say you know it for sure.
When you make a declarative statement like:
"They want to play the "I'm only human like the rest of you" shit when stuff goes wrong, but for the rest of the time? They think they are better than us, they think they are above us."
Without any other context, you are making a statement of fact.
If you had phrased that in a way that it was just a hunch you had that would be one thing, but why would I respond to it in that way when there was no indication that it was anything but a declarative statement of fact?
So yes, for this:""They want to play the "I'm only human like the rest of you" shit when stuff goes wrong, but for the rest of the time? They think they are better than us, they think they are above us."
The "they" was celebrities in general. So if you come back and try to "lol no, I'm right you're wrong" then you will kinda show why nobody really wants to engage with you. You can certainly interpret it and then I can correct you or not, but you certainly don't just get to override my explanation for something. Or well you surely can do that, but then it makes no sense to whine like a little b*tch when your comments aren't specifically responded to.
Nobody? Really? Why are you projecting your problems with me onto the rest of the board? As dead as this place is people have no issues responding to me or talking to me. My most recent PM is from a poster inviting me to a nerdy neckbeard versus thread he made that he wanted my opinion on. It isn't the first PM of the sort I've gotten. I have no problems interacting with Robtard and the other old decrepit ****s that populated this forum since before your time (at least, before your time out of the comic forum, which is IIRC where you came from), nor many of the newer members. Your problems with me are largely yours alone friend.
Whoa now, I'm not saying that your explanation of what you said is necessarily incorrect. I also don't have to believe that what you meant isn't what you actually said. But if you failed to properly convey your thoughts, humbly admit as much, rather than try to pretend what you said is merely an "interpretation".
So now I've explained what I meant. You are of course free to believe it or free to disbelieve it, but if you choose the latter route remember: there will literally be no valid reason for continued discourse, because we'd just go around in circles. Surely someone as vastly intelligent as yourself could comprehend this, despite whatever you might believe about me. So I guess..time will tell and we'll just see exactly how you respond.
Not really, I'm just far more cruelly conveying a similar point LordLucien made. I could not care less if Kim Kardashian was gunned down in the streets and had her head cut off and put on a baseball bat. But I also don't hate her, or even have any particular dislike for her. You, by comparison, seem to harbor some, and I find that peculiar. The certainty your writing had in her callously thinking herself above "normal" people was even more peculiar.
The edgy "Kim K. is rich for doing nothing therefore no God" thing was mostly just funny. Was that a joke?
Originally posted by NemeBro
What you meant didn't matter when I was responding to you friend. I was responding to what you said, and what you said was apparently very different than what you "meant", and like a coward you tried to play it out like I was slow for misunderstanding you, when I misunderstood nothing about your post. I perfectly understood what was written. As I said, if what you wrote is not what you meant, that is entirely your own failing. Not mine.
Which is all irrelevant once I explained what I meant. Anything else?
Well no, you actually did say you know it for sure.When you make a declarative statement like:
"They want to play the "I'm only human like the rest of you" shit when stuff goes wrong, but for the rest of the time? They think they are better than us, they think they are above us."
Without any other context, you are making a statement of fact.
Irrelevant, I later explained what I meant. Anything else?
If you had phrased that in a way that it was just a hunch you had that would be one thing, but why would I respond to it in that way when there was no indication that it was anything but a declarative statement of fact?
Because you're a smug shit starter?
Nobody? Really? Why are you projecting your problems with me onto the rest of the board? As dead as this place is people have no issues responding to me or talking to me. My most recent PM is from a poster inviting me to a nerdy neckbeard versus thread he made that he wanted my opinion on. It isn't the first PM of the sort I've gotten. I have no problems interacting with Robtard and the other old decrepit ****s that populated this forum since before your time (at least, before your time out of the comic forum, which is IIRC where you came from), nor many of the newer members. Your problems with me are largely yours alone friend.
Ah okay, you got invited to a neckbeard versus thread! Obviously I was mistaken.
Whoa now, I'm not saying that your explanation of what you said is necessarily incorrect. I also don't have to believe that what you meant isn't what you actually said. But if you failed to properly convey your thoughts, humbly admit as much, rather than try to pretend what you said is merely an "interpretation".
Irrelevant, I explained what I meant. Anything else?
Not really, I'm just far more cruelly conveying a similar point LordLucien made. I could not care less if Kim Kardashian was gunned down in the streets and had her head cut off and put on a baseball bat. But I also don't hate her, or even have any particular dislike for her. You, by comparison, seem to harbor some, and I find that peculiar. The certainty your writing had in her callously thinking herself above "normal" people was even more peculiar.
Don't harbor any dislike for her. Also "far more cruelly" ? Lol..please. Acting like a smug douche isn't really more cruel than any other response in this thread.
The edgy "Kim K. is rich for doing nothing therefore no God" thing was mostly just funny. Was that a joke?
Learned all my edginess from you friend, but yes it wasn't meant to be taken seriously. God doesn't exist, but we don't need Kim K to show that.
But..Christ Almighty. This is a friggin thread about Kim Kardashian and am I really going to indulge in some argument over it?
So okay: I have no real issue saying that I don't always phrase things the best way. I know what I truly mean, and sometimes I tend to assume everyone else should know as well, but as this is the internet..it's hard to tell.