How Powerful is Maul in Relation to Dooku?

Started by Darth Thor2 pages
Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
With or without chicken legs, he stomped Savage either way since he already had him at his mercy after disarming him

True but he pinned that physical beast down very quickly with those legs.

I'm just saying that was clearly Maul's "physical" peak, and him being so expert at melee, and given he'd already grown a lot in the Force by that time (Revival), I can see that version of Maul giving Dooku hell more so than any other version.

Yeah, his martial arts in combination with those legs are OP

The thing is that any advantage he gains over Dooku in sabers or physicals will be negated by his superior force ability.

Maul and Dooku might be fairly close in terms of raw power (midichlorian count) with Maul maybe even surpassing him idk, but Dooku is far more refined and knowledgeable.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Depends on your metric for sword skills. As a pure fencer, Dooku's noticeably better. Adding in Maul's martial arts and physicality (however overrated I find them to be), and he's quite close. Enough to pressure the Count considerably, but not enough to really win for more than 2 or 3 out of 10 rounds at best.

With the Force, Dooku's on an entirely different level - both with respects to effective power and general Force mastery.

Gets quickly dismantled in a swordsmanship bout, and incapacitated with one Force push or Lightning storm in a wizarding duel.

Think some of you may be overstating the Force gap between Maul and Dooku.

Originally posted by ares834
Quite a bit behind.

I'd like to hear Quanchi's opinion on this

Lol

Originally posted by Kurk
I'd like to hear Quanchi's opinion on this
Begging for his former masters thoughts on this once again.