How many thors equal one superman

Originally posted by h1a8
The hammer only weighs 40lbs. It can be knocked away when airborne. Even if it was on the ground Superman could knock it away. A piece of the ground would just come out with it.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
That's not at all how it works. what you're describing is how Blob's powers work, Mjolnir is more akin to the strength, shit the being trying to lift it being completely nullified when applied to the mallet's position. Mjolnir wouldn't even budge when Hulk tried to lift it in the SHIELD helicarrier which was airborne at he time. The floor crumbled under the force of his feet

Read my later posts. I made corrections. You are quoting old outdated stuff. Lol

The Earth is airborne. Enchantment works only when it's laying on something. Read my later posts for details.

If the enchantment only works when it's laying on something, explain what happened when the Hulk grabbed it in mid-air.

4 Kurse = Superman
15 Thors = Superman
5 Hulks = Superman

Originally posted by Silent Master
If the enchantment only works when it's laying on something, explain what happened when the Hulk grabbed it in mid-air.

Originally posted by h1a8
Hulk tried to lift it, not bat it away.

No he didn't. He tried to catch it. You really need to watch the movie before commenting.

Originally posted by h1a8
Let's not pretend this happened in real life.

Writers are clear with their intentions. The clipping was a tribute to the Christopher Reeve feat in Superman the movie. The intention was that he did it exactly how Reeve did it.

We aren't claiming to know how he did it, the other side is. Thus the burden is on them.

Originally posted by Silent Master
We aren't claiming to know how he did it, the other side is. Thus the burden is on them.

Where in the rules does it say we go by writer's intentions?

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Exactly. The burden of proof that he used some other method besides strength to stop tectonic plates is on anyone who wants to dispute it. He did it.

No, the burden of proof is on the person who claimed he did something that isn't supported by feats.

After all, are newspaper articles always 100% factual?

Originally posted by FrothByte
No, the burden of proof is on the person who claimed he did something that isn't supported by feats.

After all, are newspaper articles always 100% factual?

You have no way to show Thor is anywhere near as strong as Superman, until you do, might not want to keep lying about things.

Silent and Froth do got a point. That tectonic plate feat is a source of fierce debate.

Im talking about screen feats.

Ok, but it is pretty obvious Marvel fans do want to accept it.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You have no way to show Thor is anywhere near as strong as Superman, until you do, might not want to keep lying about things.

Wow. What exactly am I lying about? Have I ever said that Thor is as strong as Superman?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Im talking about screen feats.

If Superman actually has screen feats of moving tectonic plates (Cavill Superman that is) then please show it.

So if Thor or Hulk had a headline saying they moved a tectonic plate would it be valid?

Originally posted by FrothByte
If Superman actually has screen feats of moving tectonic plates (Cavill Superman that is) then please show it.

That's not what I said, liar. Go back to that comic book hole you exist in, clearly you have no life outside of it.

Techtronic Plate bit was a shout-out to Superman 1978, still don't see why it can't be used as a feat considering it's part of the film.