Originally posted by Robtard
-His ex wife (Ivanna) accused him of rape in 1989; then described it in her book in 1993. She has recently recanted.
Ivana Trump signed a prenuptial agreement. Yet, mysteriously after she softened her language from "he raped me" to "he violated me," she received $20 million, a $14 million home, and $350,000 a year in alimony. You do the math.
Originally posted by Bashar TegIf found to be true, then he shouldnt be president.
actually, kissing and groping a woman without consent is sexual assault. don't believe me? try it out.
Originally posted by Robtardits speculative. Bill was infact impeached. The cases are actually very different. I just think theres a bigger case against Bill because of more evidence, despite being first lady and generally, more likeable. He gave Hillary a job in the white house and people talk about Bill in charge of the economy. Hes going to be a senior figure in the white house acting presidential and we all know what happened LAST time.
And wouldn't that work for Bill as well?Also, Trump admits he does whatever the **** he wants sexually and gets away with it because he's rich. Some would call admission of guilt pretty solid proof.
The media is super focused on Trump rumours and attacking his silly choice of words in private meetings. There is currently zero evidence against Trump. As Basher put it, youre parroting the media who are crying shitwolf.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Ivana Trump signed a prenuptial agreement. Yet, mysteriously after she softened her language from "he raped me" to "he violated me," she received $20 million, a $14 million home, and $350,000 a year in alimony. You do the math.
Adam, remember when you were talking about one of the reasons you are gay is cause you hate women?
Yea dont come in here acting like you are some big feminist.
Originally posted by Robtard
It seems like the core of your argument is "Bill is a more prolific rapist", yeah? While that might very well be true, Bill is not running for office.We also have Trump bragging on audio and video how he does whatever the **** he wants with women, cos he's rich.
So this really just seems like more Bill distraction, which imo, is silly, no offense.
Yea of course the the fact that he's married to Hillary is irrelevant lets just suspend common sense because we are on the internet.
I really didn't like listening to that audio and I really didn't want to sit through all of it but I don't hear him say anything about him touching women against their will.
I don't think Trump is a rapist and I don't know about all of those cases but I've seen him accused of all sorts of things and seen them debunked. Lot's of famous people get accused of rape doesn't mean they're rapists, but when you got somebody like Bill who has an accusation of rape going as far back as 1969 it's unlikely that they're all made up.
The rape rumours against Bill dont even come close to the fact that someone who was impeached for abusing his position of power as president is likely to be the next first lady. To go from Michelle Obama to Bill Clinton is odd. Heck, I dont think any first lady has ever abused their position of power to get close to women. Or any form of sexual harassment. Its assault btw. When a boss sleeps with a colleague, he can get sued for sexual harassment. Abusing a position of power and wasting government time and federal tax money. Its a big deal.
I like how all the liberals are like "bill isn't running for president"
Actually, he kind of is.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/16/news/economy/hillary-bill-clinton-economic-job-growth/
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I like how all the liberals are like "bill isn't running for president"Actually, he kind of is.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/16/news/economy/hillary-bill-clinton-economic-job-growth/
It's stupid argument anyway. Liberals like to suspend common sens when they feel like it.
Originally posted by SurturBecause it's bunk obviously. How are you people so naive?
Well if he has emails proving they are lying..where are they? Let's go. We don't have time to waste. Nip this in the butt so we don't have to hear people whining about it.
On topic, when it gets to the point where we should be discussing who hasn't accused Trump of being a dirty, tiny-handed pervert, I think we can safely conclude that he is.
Originally posted by BeniboyblingI prefer concrete evidence.
Because it's bunk obviously. How are you people so naive?On topic, when it gets to the point where we should be discussing who hasn't accused Trump of being a dirty, tiny-handed pervert, I think we can safely conclude that he is.
I understand a trial must take place, but smear campaigns are a thing.
Originally posted by Deadline
Yea of course the the fact that he's married to Hillary is irrelevant lets just suspend common sense because we are on the internet.I really didn't like listening to that audio and I really didn't want to sit through all of it but I don't hear him say anything about him touching women against their will.
I don't think Trump is a rapist and I don't know about all of those cases but I've seen him accused of all sorts of things and seen them debunked. Lot's of famous people get accused of rape doesn't mean they're rapists, but when you got somebody like Bill who has an accusation of rape going as far back as 1969 it's unlikely that they're all made up.
Because it's not fair to Hillary, she's the one running; not Bill.
You should listen to all of it before deciding, imo. He literally brags how he does things to women and he can, because he's rich. There's also audio of him bragging how he walks in on the Miss America contestants while they're naked.
See above. Trump has accusations going back, sure not 1969 of rape. It's odd that accusations for Bill = guilt, but accusations for Trump (never mind him bragging) = not guilt. IMO, it's should be equal rules for both of them.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I like how all the liberals are like "bill isn't running for president"Actually, he kind of is.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/16/news/economy/hillary-bill-clinton-economic-job-growth/
Originally posted by Its2016
If found to be true, then he shouldnt be president.its speculative. Bill was infact impeached. The cases are actually very different. I just think theres a bigger case against Bill because of more evidence, despite being first lady and generally, more likeable. He gave Hillary a job in the white house and people talk about Bill in charge of the economy. Hes going to be a senior figure in the white house acting presidential and we all know what happened LAST time.
The media is super focused on Trump rumours and attacking his silly choice of words in private meetings. There is currently zero evidence against Trump. As Basher put it, youre parroting the media who are crying shitwolf.
Bill was impeached for lying, not for rape. The sex between him and Monica was consensual. Your insistent of this being different shows you're either uninformed or trolling.
Since when is someone admitting they did something not evidence? Trump on the tape isn't saying that "he could"; he's saying "he has" groped and grabbed women and gets away with it because of his fame/fortune.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I like how all the liberals are like "bill isn't running for president"Actually, he kind of is.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/16/news/economy/hillary-bill-clinton-economic-job-growth/
You've claimed on multiple occasions that Bill has dementia and will likely be hospitalized soon. So why worry now about Bill being the secret POTOS?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Just like this khan job airplane story was consensual " I was fine with him touching me all over.."
You forgot the important part: "until he reached under my skirt"
YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZwvrxVavnQ
IMO, all the Trump apologist should watch that short video.
Originally posted by RobtardHow do you feel about Hillary Clinton's spouse having rape allegations against him and abusing his position of power to have his cigars taste like pussy? How do you feel that this wasted federal tax money and government time during years of terrorist scares that lead up to 911? Will Hillary Clintons spouse have any involvement in government policy and seniority as part of the administration?
Because it's not fair to Hillary, she's the one running; not Bill.
I Recall a presidents spouse does indeed have involvement and can act like a role model, in the 90s we had Hillary Clinton do just that, and her efforts were not well received by some, and praised by others.
Will such things repeat themselves? And if not, why not?
You should listen to all of it before deciding, imo. He literally brags how he does things to women and he can, because he's rich. There's also audio of him bragging how he walks in on the Miss America contestants while they're naked.The case for Hillary's spouse have more conviction.See above. Trump has accusations going back, sure not 1969 of rape. It's odd that accusations for Bill = guilt, but accusations for Trump (never mind him bragging) = not guilt. IMO, it's should be equal rules for both of them.