Originally posted by RobtardTy for replying in an anti clinton thread. It still proves me right.
HYG: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f70/YW
Originally posted by RobtardTy for replying in an anti clinton thread. It still proves me right.
HYG: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f70/YW
Originally posted by RobtardI bash bernie all the time and you ignore me.
Shit on Clinton all you like, but you bash my bro Bernie and it's on. Consider yourself warned.
For example, give money to Bernie to be against establishment, oh turns out he never put up a fight and all your donations go the establishment. Vote estsblishment.
You wont debate me. Youre using Bashers argument "lol he drunk, lets bully him"
How does it feel to vote establishment after all that Bernie wanking? Youll be the first to be drafted too.
All Bernie did is make voting for someone you hate, cool. Thats literally what youre doing. "I hate hillary, but bernie told me its cool to vote for what i hate"
Originally posted by Its2016
You wont debate me. Youre using Bashers argument "lol he drunk, lets bully him"How does it feel to vote establishment after all that Bernie wanking? Youll be the first to be drafted too.
All Bernie did is make voting for someone you hate, cool. Thats literally what youre doing. "I hate hillary, but bernie told me its cool to vote for what i hate"
"Debate" implies that you have put forward a sensible argument and not the usual nonsense.
I'm likely writing in Sanders on my ballot or voting 3rd party.
See what I mean? What's there to debate when you just drunkenly rant?
Originally posted by Bashar Tegcomplex emotions? You mean voting for hillary because the dark forces will kill us otherwise? Losers gotta lose, i guess. Apathetically not voting doesnt count. You need to stand up and say to the msm and congress "im voting trump so **** you"
you'd probably be able to process all these complex emotions if you were sober.
Anything else is despicable.
Ty for posting in a thread against Hillary. Now if youd address he topic, wed be cool.
Originally posted by RobtardClinton involved with staging the riots you mental case.
"Debate" implies that you have put forward a sensible argument and not the usual nonsense.I'm likely writing in Sanders on my ballot or voting 3rd party.
See what I mean? What's there to debate when you just drunkenly rant?
Originally posted by Petrustremendous flaws? Name some. Did he defend his rapist spouse? Did he fund terrorism? Did he stage riots against his opponents? Or is a meanie head? Which one of these describes him best?
Love it. Ignore Trump's tremendous flaws and highlight Hillary's. That's the way to go. 👆
Originally posted by Robtardwhere are you getting 142 from? And its not just about this video which you only reply in due to my other thread. Its the wikileaks. Why do you ignore the wikileaks?
Sorry if I don't take yet another Clinton conspiracy YouTube video as unquestionable fact. You're just going to have to excuse me here; the previous 142 "Clinton Busted" videos I've watched have made a skeptic out of me.
Originally posted by Its2016
where are you getting 142 from?And its not just about this video which you only reply in due to my other thread.
Its the wikileaks. Why do you ignore the wikileaks?
It was a conservative guesstimate, it's likely much higher, but I was being kind, because I am kind.
I literally am replying in this thread. See what I mean?
Again, I clearly don't "ignore" the wikileaks cos I've argued in multiple threads about them multiple times on multiple occasions. Multiples of multiples of multiples.
But as noted, I'm not gong to flip out over Podesta's alien conspiracy lunacy, if someone said "needy latinos" or that someone else claimed Clinton hates Americans. Sorry, but I'm sensible and like to think logically, not let my emotions run uncontrolled.
Originally posted by Petrus
Love it. Ignore Trump's tremendous flaws and highlight Hillary's. That's the way to go. 👆
It's actually usually the other way around, with Hilary's stuff being the one that is ignored and all of Trump's stuff highlighted. That's what the MSM does.
Speaking of loving things, I love how the only people who seriously responded to this thread are people who don't feel Hilary is the lesser of two evils. So the icing on the cake is for you to then come in here talking about Trumps stuff being ignored lol.
Originally posted by Robtard
Again, I clearly don't "ignore" the wikileaks cos I've argued in multiple threads about them multiple times on multiple occasions. Multiples of multiples of multiples.
Out of all the recent threads about Hilary lately..this thread contains the most damning thing. If they are involved in organizing some of these conflicts with Trump supporters, etc. that is a pretty damn big deal. But you didn't really comment on it, all you did was quote Bernie Sanders. You didn't agree or disagree or question the evidence or anything.
But as noted, I'm not gong to flip out over Podesta's alien conspiracy lunacy, if someone said "needy latinos" or that someone else claimed Clinton hates Americans. Sorry, but I'm sensible and like to think logically, not let my emotions run uncontrolled.
Wait, why is racism somehow not as bad as Trump talking about groping chicks? How is the response people have had to the latter not an emotional response?
All people do with Trump is have emotional responses, it's why the media easily plays to that kind of thing. We are in an age where people can get offended over any little thing, which makes someone like Donald Trump a gold mine.
Originally posted by Robtardyou think using our arguments against us is clever? Notice the gap between the reply. Wikileaks is valid because it had his actual apple id in the emails. It was valid, ok? The wikileaks are real. Once you accept that, you understand how evil the clinton campaign is given everything else in context. Ill break it down if you want.
It was a conservative guesstimate, it's likely much higher, but I was being kind, because I am kind.I literally am replying in this thread. See what I mean?
Again, I clearly don't "ignore" the wikileaks cos I've argued in multiple threads about them multiple times on multiple occasions. Multiples of multiples of multiples.
But as noted, I'm not gong to flip out over Podesta's alien conspiracy lunacy, if someone said "needy latinos" or that someone else claimed Clinton hates Americans. Sorry, but I'm sensible and like to think logically, not let my emotions run uncontrolled.
You ignore wikileaks. Almost every thread on the front page is wikileaks and you have posted in none.
Originally posted by Surtur"grab them by the pussy" = tremendous flaws. There are plenty of threads on here that point out hillarys flaws.
It's actually usually the other way around, with Hilary's stuff being the one that is ignored and all of Trump's stuff highlighted. That's what the MSM does.Speaking of loving things, I love how the only people who seriously responded to this thread are people who don't feel Hilary is the lesser of two evils. So the icing on the cake is for you to then come in here talking about Trumps stuff being ignored lol.