Tapes of Clinton staging the Trump riots

Good job avoiding evidence from the horses mouth, Bashar Al Assad.

Originally posted by 80sBaby
Thanks.

And yeah, I stand by my statement. What they describe is basic trolling. Wearing a planned parenthood t-shirt or simply saying 'Trump is a nazi' is all it takes to spur violence then that says more about Trump's base, in my opinion. This isn't really a smoking gun.

So if someone said the audio from 11 years ago of Trump was just him trolling, your response would be..what?

Also, why didn't you mention things like them discussing conflict engagements in Trump rally lines? Why didn't you mention the part they more or less go "forget the law, we need to win this motherf*cker!". That is outright saying they do not care what they have to do, legal or illegal, in order to win.

Wait Trumps tape was heavily edited as well, makes it illegitimate.

Also wait, I call bullshit on the "all it takes to stir violence is to call Trump a nazi". That suggests that EVERY SINGLE time we had violence at a Trump rally, it was a Trump supporter instigating it because some dipshit said something bad about Trump.

Which just flat out isn't true at all. These pieces of utter shit weren't showing up to block people from entering rallies because one of their own said something bad about Trump.

Also if this logic was true there should have been violence at every single rally, because I guarantee you every one of them had some dipshit showing up just to talk shit.

Trump's tape was heavily edited. We don't even see him saying it.

lol now they're fake. must be cozy inside your bubble. can i cuddle too?

I'm not saying they are fake. I'm using 80'baby logic and showing how stupid it is, Bashar Al Assad

I still don't understand how saying offensive things about women is bad, but planning to instigate violence which could potentially result in innocent people being hurt is somehow still the lesser offense? Really?

You should see the things Al Bashar has said about women here.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's actually usually the other way around, with Hilary's stuff being the one that is ignored and all of Trump's stuff highlighted. That's what the MSM does.

Speaking of loving things, I love how the only people who seriously responded to this thread are people who don't feel Hilary is the lesser of two evils. So the icing on the cake is for you to then come in here talking about Trumps stuff being ignored lol.

I was not-so-lowkey throwing a punch to TI, tbh. He always defends Trump and ignores his very, very significant flaws.

The truth is neither's stuff should be ignored. Both should be acknowledged as terrible candidates, and honestly, anyone who strongly and endlessly supports either of them pretty much lives life without accepting their massive flaws. I just cannot comprehend how smart people happily choose one over the other, especially when it's so clear that both irremediably suck.

Originally posted by Petrus
I was not-so-lowkey throwing a punch to TI, tbh. He always defends Trump and ignores his very, very significant flaws.

The truth is neither's stuff should be ignored. Both should be acknowledged as terrible candidates, and honestly, anyone who strongly and endlessly supports either of them pretty much lives life without accepting their massive flaws. I just cannot comprehend how smart people happily choose one over the other, especially when it's so clear that both irremediably suck.

The reason Trump is popular is because to people he represents change. Some people want this at all costs, and they are even willing to support Trump in order to get it. Since they know with Hilary it will just be a situation of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".

That is the mistake some people tend to make when they write off Trump supporters as nothing but racists. If the thirst for change hadn't been ignored then Trump wouldn't have stood any real chance.

Trump's mere presence in this election shows people are fed up. Otherwise they would have just gone with a "safer" candidate.

Originally posted by Petrus
I was not-so-lowkey throwing a punch to TI, tbh. He always defends Trump and ignores his very, very significant flaws.

The truth is neither's stuff should be ignored. Both should be acknowledged as terrible candidates, and honestly, anyone who strongly and endlessly supports either of them pretty much lives life without accepting their massive flaws. I just cannot comprehend how smart people happily choose one over the other, especially when it's so clear that both irremediably suck.

Just like you ignore all of Clintons and only talk about Trump's. You are nothing more then a troll, as you just admitted.

Lol did anyone watch all these tapes? Literally they say they are committing voter fraud.

Man this stings for liberals real bad.

Originally posted by Surtur
The reason Trump is popular is because to people he represents change. Some people want this at all costs, and they are even willing to support Trump in order to get it. Since they know with Hilary it will just be a situation of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".

That is the mistake some people tend to make when they write off Trump supporters as nothing but racists. If the thirst for change hadn't been ignored then Trump wouldn't have stood any real chance.

Trump's mere presence in this election shows people are fed up. Otherwise they would have just gone with a "safer" candidate.

You do make a good point. I'm not saying his followers are racists. I'm just saying smart people should realize how bad he actually is, whether they want the change or not.