Thoughts on Wikileaks Denial

The wikileaks from Podestas emails seem to be so damming that the Media, the DNC and HRC campaign has to completely deny their existence.

Podesta admits his email was hacked, but refuses to validate his own emails.

If the emails were not legit, then how did they end up in the debate, like this one?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205

Or how do they end up with detailed information on the clinton campaign, dates, meetings times of phone calls, peoples phone numbers.

Are we really supposed to believe Russia fabricated all this and it happens to just look true, but not really?

Just to be clear: so Podesta has admitted he was hacked. So is he also saying not only was he hacked, but his hacked emails were somehow edited? Has he directly claimed the emails are wrong?

I was kind of horrified to hear that Donna Brazille woman, when Megyn Kelly confronted her about the shit in the emails, just go "oh so you're using stolen stuff!".

So okay, we've all acknowledged these things were not legally obtained. But they are out there now, so we need more than just "well you're using stolen evidence".

Since, this woman denied she did what they are saying when it came to the questions given out, but then she gets pissy when the emails are brought up as proof of her actions. I'm confused, has ANYONE come out and directly said these hacked emails have been altered? Since that is a much more legitimate road to go down than "well oh the evidence you got was stolen".

I don't care if the evidence came from Santa Clause himself, is it VALID? If it is valid, whether or not it is stolen is not the most pressing issue here. Have we become the type of country where we whine about the breach of privacy and not what the breach reveals? Which, isn't that hypocritical as hell for our government to have that stance?

Remember Trump's tax returns were illegally obtained, the left didn't care.

Also look at the forum, none of the liberals here care about the emails, they were already programmed to deny their existence.

Remember, Trump was called vile for saying the things he said, but the democrats planning to start riots at Trump rallies was called "trolling" lol.

I wake up this morning and what are the main stories? Oh, Trump and Hilary at some asinine Catholic benefit and Trump made rude or unfunny jokes. That was the top news story when I got up today.

At this point this is like a heroin addict that refuses to get clean. At some point you just have to sit back and let them OD.

Are we supposed to believe he isn't cheating on his wife here?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22197

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Are we supposed to believe he isn't cheating on his wife here?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22197

Well no that's just..I dunno, I'm sure the guy was just doing research on speed dating because..reasons?

Plus just because he is deceitful and manipulative to those closest to him doesn't mean he behaves that way with others. I mean, JFK cheated too so...yeah? I dunno, I'm running out of straws to grasp at.

No he was talking to the person he was going on a date with.

I mean holy shit if you're going to cheat on your wife as a politician just get a hooker like everyone else. Do you seriously want to DATE a female willing to get involved with a married man? Are there zero standards anymore?

russia stole the wikileaks they are made up

Proof?

the burden of proof rests on anyone who wants to assert wikileaks' authenticity.

Were you born stupid? Or did you end up that way through liberalism.

Now you are going to deny these emails exist?😂

They came from his email address, you hack.

Also Clinton already verified the authenticity.😂

haha yeah totally bro. but anyway the point stands and you're wrong.

"the thing is authentic" <----burden of proof

"the thing is not proven to be authentic" <----no burden of proof

Clinton already verified the authenticity👆

Sucks to be you👆

oh snap! source?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wikileaks-clinton-confirmed-authenticity-of-podesta-emails/article/2605063

do you have a valid source?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wikileaks-clinton-confirmed-authenticity-of-podesta-emails/article/2605063

you're good, you

Nice owning you👆