Why would podesta validate them? Not validating them is a much smarter move on his part, as it allows people to express doubt about their authenticity.
The reason she's deflecting stuff about these as much as she can is because she's winning all while ignoring the leaks for the most part.
If in the next couple of weeks the polls start to get close, and their internal polling shows that the leaks are starting to have an impact, she will be forced to confront them in a way she hasn't had to yet.
Personally I don't expect that to happen. I think the people who are really bothered by these emails generally already have their mind made up about her. And barring some legitimately huge leak, I think the damage has been done, and the damage hasn't been all that severe.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you can't just say "the universe came from a unicorn's butthole", put the burden of proof on the doubter to prove it wrong, and then kick back and celebrate your victory.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
secondly, since goldbach's conjecture cannot be proven, it cannot be asserted as mathematical fact. thats the whole point of calling something 'theoretical'. so i don't see how that's even relevant.
That said, Goldbach's conjecture does hold for very large numbers, and I brought it up specifically because there are methods relying on it that are used in a number of computational algorithms.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...and if the pawn shop is selling something claimed to be authentic, it is also up to them to provide proof.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no it does not indicate motive. all it does is leave room for suspicion, which doesn't hold up when the goal is assigning any guilt, let alone "beyond reasonable doubt".
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah, that's just pure supposition. pleading the 5th cannot be used as supporting evidence of guilt. there's no way to explain around that.
Originally posted by BackFire
Why would podesta validate them? Not validating them is a much smarter move on his part, as it allows people to express doubt about their authenticity.The reason she's deflecting stuff about these as much as she can is because she's winning all while ignoring the leaks for the most part.
If in the next couple of weeks the polls start to get close, and their internal polling shows that the leaks are starting to have an impact, she will be forced to confront them in a way she hasn't had to yet.
Personally I don't expect that to happen. I think the people who are really bothered by these emails generally already have their mind made up about her. And barring some legitimately huge leak, I think the damage has been done, and the damage hasn't been all that severe.
Originally posted by BackFire
Why would podesta validate them? Not validating them is a much smarter move on his part, as it allows people to express doubt about their authenticity.The reason she's deflecting stuff about these as much as she can is because she's winning all while ignoring the leaks for the most part.
If in the next couple of weeks the polls start to get close, and their internal polling shows that the leaks are starting to have an impact, she will be forced to confront them in a way she hasn't had to yet.
Personally I don't expect that to happen. I think the people who are really bothered by these emails generally already have their mind made up about her. And barring some legitimately huge leak, I think the damage has been done, and the damage hasn't been all that severe.
But don't you agree there is a problem when Trumps comments about women(admittedly vile) seem to get more of a rise out of people than the Clinton campaign making plans to cause riots at rallies?
I agree with you 100% the damage hasn't been severe and *that* is what worries me. It's one thing to say they are fake, but I'm just amazed people seem content to just ignore these. By "people" I mean the media.
Originally posted by Its2016
YouTube video>citation
Originally posted by RobtardWallace mentioned their source for her emails was wikileaks. Clinton clearly says "what I was saying" in reference to the email and the question regarding immigration, then used scare tactics against Russia so people vote for her. Youre braindead. Youre immensely butthurt you thought wikileaks was nothing. Youre a failure.
Question: Was Clinton admitting that the wikileaks emails existed or that they existed and were legit, meaning not fabrications
B-b-but Donald Drumpf is an clown.
Face it, you ****ing lose.
YouTube video i only need trump to win nevada to make a profit. 😄
YouTube video CNN getting owned. XD
I provided the quotes, you ignored them👆
"CLINTON: Well, right. As I recall, that was something I said about Abraham Lincoln after having seen the wonderful Steven Spielberg movie called “Lincoln.†It was a master class watching President Lincoln get the Congress to approve the 13th Amendment. It was principled, and it was strategic."
CLINTON: Well, right. As I recall, that was something I said about Abraham Lincoln after having seen the wonderful Steven Spielberg movie called “Lincoln.” It was a master class watching President Lincoln get the Congress to approve the 13th Amendment. It was principled, and it was strategic.
Wallace: That's the question. Please, quiet, everybody. Is that your dream? Open borders?
Clinton: If you went on to read the rest of the sentence, I was talking about energy. We trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined. And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders. I think that would be a great benefit to us.