Please tell me its not true

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I love the fake outrage expressed by conservatives who act as if anything in these leaks do not reflect the activity of every successful politician in human history.

Like seriously, the idea that grown adults were shocked that a politician had a public and private position just shows how naive and gullible your typical republican is.

Except nobody was truly shocked at this. Oh shit, Hilary Clinton is deceitful and manipulative? No, not surprised. It got focused on due to there being an outright admission of it.

I just broke Elliminist😂

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm legitimately just wondering if you'd truly care. Not just for this, but for all the wikileaks stuff.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Its to bad you can't understand humor, while calling someone else "dumb"😂

Remember when he called me Sulfur? Good times.

Originally posted by Surtur
Except nobody was truly shocked at this. Oh shit, Hilary Clinton is deceitful and manipulative? No, not surprised. It got focused on due to there being an outright admission of it.

I have public and private positions. So did Lincoln, Washington, etc. Anyone who didn't would not have lasted long in real life, let alone politics.

That you don't think this is true is just embarrassing.

Originally posted by Surtur
Remember when he called me Sulfur? Good times.

The fact that you don't recognize how stupid TI is is...well, not that surprising.

Seriously, do you think it's a coincidence that your allies on this forum are...TI and his sock?

Originally posted by Surtur
Remember when he called me Sulfur? Good times.

😂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
if anything damning is verified as authentic, i want to know. im not taking wikileaks at face value because most of it is just self referencing evidence that has not be verified. tired of having to reword that and repeat.

So if it was verified would it actually change the way you would vote?

Also ignoring everything else with the emails, what about the video of them discussing starting riots at Trump rallies? Remember that yes the video was edited, but there are also parts where they clearly reference plans to cause "conflict engagements" at Trump rallies.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
The fact that you don't recognize how stupid TI is is...well, not that surprising.

Seriously, do you think it's a coincidence that your allies on this forum are...TI and his sock?

Calling other people stupid while proposing a forum conspiracy😂

And still voting for Hillary Clinton😂

^Sulfur, observe your best friends brilliance

Originally posted by Surtur
So if it was verified would it actually change the way you would vote?

Also ignoring everything else with the emails, what about the video of them discussing starting riots at Trump rallies? Remember that yes the video was edited, but there are also parts where they clearly reference plans to cause "conflict engagements" at Trump rallies.

i havent memorized wikileaks, so i have no context from which to answer that. not interested in any of it until its authenticated (again). as for that one example, its comically pathetic about how you ignore trump calling for violence on camera, while people are being assaulted, but sound the fire alarm when its rumored that clinton did it in private. is it even possible to stretch situational ethics beyond that? would it change my vote if it was true? i might just stay home. would never vote trump.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
^Sulfur, observe your best friends brilliance

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I have public and private positions. So did Lincoln, Washington, etc. Anyone who didn't would not have lasted long in real life, let alone politics.

That you don't think this is true is just embarrassing.

The fact that you immediately followed up this post with another post calling someone else stupid is priceless to me.

Just what on Earth are you even babbling about? Who the hell said politicians haven't done this before?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
^Sulfur, observe your best friends brilliance

How can I? Your brilliance is blinding me.

Originally posted by Surtur
The fact that you immediately followed up this post with another post calling someone else stupid is priceless to me.

Just what on Earth are you even babbling about? Who the hell said politicians haven't done this before?

He just makes up lies claims you said it, or its your opinion.

Originally posted by Surtur
How can I? Your brilliance is blinding me.

The smartest person in the room never goes around calling people dumb, he would know this, if he was actually smart.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i havent memorized wikileaks, so i have no context from which to answer that. not interested in any of it until its authenticated (again). as for that one example, its comically pathetic about how you ignore trump calling for violence on camera, while people are being assaulted, but sound the fire alarm when its rumored that clinton did it in private. is it even possible to stretch situational ethics beyond that?

Who ignored what Trump did? The more recent story is about the Clinton campaign planning to show up and cause riots. I've denounced any violence or calls for violence on the Trump side. I find it silly to assume I have to put in some kind of disclaimer about Trump if I'm talking about someone doing something with violence. I also find pre planning to specifically show up to cause a conflict is worse than what Trump did, but I never said it was okay what he did.

Was there a more recent situation with Trump I haven't heard of? The shit you are talking about happened a while ago and I've commented on it before.

I mean at least when the Trump supporters have gotten truly violent the cops stepped in(as they should). Yet there was the one rally(I believe in San Jose) where the cops just kind of watched as protesters attacked Trump supporters. That is truly ignoring shit., but okay.

I don't see anything particularly noteworthy in this email? Someone want to point out what's supposed to be a big deal here?

This next post has nothing to do with this specific email, but I just have to wonder..will we ever stop excusing shady behavior for the politicians?

I'm just thinking of the "all politicians behave this way" thing that goes around. Not to say that isn't correct, but I feel like we've almost become numb to shadiness and corruption. In fact, we expect it.

How can this ever change if we don't start to change the way we react to certain behavior from politicians? I'm always disturbed when someone shrugs off something with a "that's politics" line. I guess in part because they aren't wrong.

Originally posted by BackFire
I don't see anything particularly noteworthy in this email? Someone want to point out what's supposed to be a big deal here?