DarthDuelist9
Senior Member
Originally posted by Darth Thor
The implication was they'd been fighting for over a minute without either of them gaining ground. That's actually a pretty nice feat for Maul given that's on Filoni's show, and Filoni is admittedly biased towards Ahsoka whom he's turned into a powerhouse.It wasn't a strong enough confirmation on StarWars.com IMO
No that wasn't the implication, we never see them starting to fight and looking at how they, like you said, have barely moved when the screen cuts back to them. Considering that when we actually see them fight they're moving all over the place and clearly aren't staying in one place at all, it's more likely they only recently started to fight and not for anything close to a minute.
A confirmation is a confirmation, little to debate about it.
It's not about holding it against him. It's about what Rebel Maul's greatest feat is. According to you it's beating Inquisitors, and then ending his debut episode with a terrible low showing.Yes it should be a one-off, but it'd be nice for them to have Maul easily beating Kanan & Ezra to show that was clearly a one-off case.
It isn't a low showing if circumstances are involved, that's my entire point. You can't compare Maul losing to Kanan with him beating Inquisitors (or fighting with Ahsoka) because the context is entirely different.
Agreed, it would.