Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So actual pictures and emails are my proof, but CNN would be?
Your Wikileak email does in no way say Clinton is an alcoholic, it says she was [supposedly] drunk on Aug 8th 2015 (this was a Saturday, btw)
Your pictures show Clinton having a drink at various events in various stages of her life
I prefer to not jump to conclusions.
Originally posted by Robtard
If they showed reasonable proof, sure, just as I would with any news outlet that did the same.
Originally posted by Robtard
If they showed reasonable proof, sure, just as I would with any news outlet that did the same.
Originally posted by Robtardyou wouldnt know reasonable proof if it stared you in the face. And i was the one who googled her drinking.
If they showed reasonable proof, sure, just as I would with any news outlet that did the same.
Before you start playing games of "whos the better troll" with me, i actually agree with you on this one. It would explain why she collapsed on 911 tho.
Originally posted by Robtard
Your Wikileak email does in no way say Clinton is an alcoholic, it says she was [supposedly] drunk on Aug 8th 2015 (this was a Saturday, btw)Your pictures show Clinton having a drink at various events in various stages of her life
I prefer to not jump to conclusions.
I don't know if you saw the front page of every Newspaper today about CGI but I doubt you think that is proof either.
You will deny it all, just like you deny everything else, but you believe everything you hear about trump cause someone said so.
Originally posted by Its2016
you wouldnt know reasonable proof if it stared you in the face. And i was the one who googled her drinking.Before you start playing games of "whos the better troll" with me, i actually agree with you on this one. It would explain why she collapsed on 911 tho.
Coming from the guy who reads an obvious satire article from an The Onion-like site and believes it to be fact, not once; but twice. Hilarious
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
One you ignore it on purpose, second you won't accept anything as proof.But you consider whatever someone says about trump as fact.
Excuse me if I don't follow every single Clinton story.
This is just not true and rather funny considering your stance on the Clintons.