Clinton is an alocholic

Originally posted by dadudemon
I should probably be more humble and just admit I'm wrong to Robtard that way it doesn't seem like I'm being an obstinate jackass:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/15/how-donald-trumps-candidacy-is-hurting-his-business-empire/

But the Wa-Po is liberal leaning/anti-Trump. I tried to find a nice run-down from a pro-Trump side to point out the weaknesses in the anti-Trump business stuff but it was too hard so it is better I concede and give up then to waste anymore time on this topic.

No worries, admitting you've made an error or could have possibly made an error is the sensible/adult thing to do. No shame in that whatsoever.

Originally posted by BackFire
There was talk earlier in this thread about Trump's remarks losing him women voters. It's true. After the first debate and his idiotic twitter tirade against Machado he started hemorrhaging women votes. She actually wasn't that far ahead in the women vote before that, now the lead has grown substantially.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-women-propel-hillary-clinton-into-battleground-lead-over-donald-trump/

XYZ won't accept this as proof; it's not Brietbart.

I don't think he'll accept anything as proof unless it's at the bottom of a bottle.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Hey, now, I tried to put a stop to the character assassination against Robtard very quickly when it looked like you were trying to do that.

No worries luv...wasnt aimed at u. Robs a big boy im sure he's had enough practice playing verbal jujitsu. I was just curious about his heritage.

OT..i would care nothing more than if either candidate won and prove everyone wrong and made America a better place or atleast no worse than it currently is. Seems like this country is more into labels and talking points than actually extending olive branches and fixing shit.

Trump lost women due to first debate and idiotic tirade with Machado = trump lost women vote from pussygate

Wait, those are different things entirely. I dont accept liberal logic.

Or you know, it could be both that had negative affects, since both scandals feature Trump having a poor attitude towards women. /logic

Originally posted by Robtard
Or you know, it could be both that had negative affects, since both scandals feature Trump having a poor attitude towards women. /logic

So rob your not going to respond to my post?

Originally posted by Its2016
i must have missed that part of backfires source.

Cool story, bro 👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So rob your not going to respond to my post?

I did, friend. You must have missed it due to XYZ's spamming, happened to me as well. But here you go:

Originally posted by Robtard
Sorry, XYZ's spamming, lost track of your post. Wasn't intentionally dodging.

Inciting violence is just that, it can be words or it can be actions.

Haven't followed the Creamer thing, I told you that days ago, so I can't comment.

Originally posted by Robtard
Cool story, bro 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
I did, friend. You must have missed it due to XYZ's spamming, happened to me as well. But here you go:

Can you please watch the videos so we can talk about them?

Some good points here. 👆

YouTube video

So she's a boozehound? That would somewhat explain all of her 'accidents'.

She could be a boozehound. I mean, did someone flat out tell her being an alcoholic was wrong? It's our fault for keeping Hilary ignorant and in the dark about the dangers of alcoholism.

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/photos/hillary-clinton-drinking-alcoholic-sober-up-wikileaks/