Originally posted by Its2016
back pedalling. You want kaine to be president to pardon hillary.Dont forget to tell your buddies at work how youre an expert troll.
Even if that were true it wouldn't be backpedaling on a stance, you silly drunk.
Get off the dole and get a job for once, then you can have work friends too :0
Originally posted by Surtur
So saying they need to determine who wins is not them talking about trying to influence it in some way? Really?
There are legal ways to "push for" an election's outcome. Maybe making sure more women voted, since women are repressed in some countries., making sure more people knew the pros and cons of the candidates via advertising etc. etc. etc.
I understand that you need to believe Clinton was talking about illegal rigging of an election and that's fine, you're free to believe it, but her words as they are do not burn her there. The thread starter is a well known idiot and he used another BS header for the thread topic.
Originally posted by Robtard
There are legal ways to "push for" an election's outcome. Maybe making sure more women voted, since women are repressed in some countries., making sure more people knew the pros and cons of the candidates via advertising etc. etc. etc.I understand that you need to believe Clinton was talking about illegal rigging of an election and that's fine, you're free to believe it, but her words as they are do not burn her there. The thread starter is a well known idiot and he used another BS header for the thread.
But uh..isn't pushing for an outcome, even legally...influencing the election?
Since I wasn't talking about just legalities really. They weren't complaining Russia was merely doing illegal things, they were complaining they were trying to influence the election.
You've yet to sufficiently explain to me how this is not them talking about influencing the election of another country.
On a side note, isn't what you just said a good thing, about how it could be referencing legal means and there is no way to show otherwise? Since it means this probably isn't what made them re-open the investigation. So for me this is two birds one stone: shows hypocrisy and doesn't immediately crush my hopes, since yes if this is all they had I'd be worried.
Originally posted by Surtur
But uh..isn't pushing for an outcome, even legally...influencing the election?Since I wasn't talking about just legalities really. They weren't complaining Russia was merely doing illegal things, they were complaining they were trying to influence the election.
You've yet to sufficiently explain to me how this is not them talking about influencing the election of another country.
On a side note, isn't what you just said a good thing, about how it could be referencing legal means and there is no way to show otherwise? Since it means this probably isn't what made them re-open the investigation. So for me this is two birds one stone: shows hypocrisy and doesn't immediately crush my hopes, since yes if this is all they had I'd be worried.
The election the US pushed for in the first place since the US has it's fingers heavily in the Middle East. You don't have to like it, just letting you know that this can't be what's supposedly going to bring Clinton down, because it's nothing.
If your complaint is the US shouldn't interfere with other countries, I'm largely with you.
Originally posted by Robtard
The election the US pushed for in the first place since the US has it's fingers heavily in the Middle East. You don't have to like it, just letting you know that this can't be what's supposedly going to bring Clinton down, because it's nothing.If your complaint is the US shouldn't interfere with other countries, I'm largely with you.
My complaint is that we have had one side complaining about another country interfering in elections while they scheme to do the same thing.
I'm not talking about whether or not I think this behavior is right or wrong, but it's hard to take their cries seriously when they operate on a scale of morality that is basically "do as I say not as I do".
Originally posted by Surtur
My complaint is that we have had one side complaining about another country interfering in elections while they scheme to do the same thing.I'm not talking about whether or not I think this behavior is right or wrong, but it's hard to take their cries seriously when they operate on a scale of morality that is basically "do as I say not as I do".
America as the "world police" is just that though.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Rob why is trump a baffoon for thinking the election is rigged when Hillary is on tape trying to rig other elections, and we have proof hey rigged the primary, and we have a bob Creamer admitting it?
Bit of a loaded question, don't you think. Anyhow:
-Already covered what Clinton said here; it's hardly a smoking gun as her comment can be taking more than one way
-Bernie being shafted is why I lost all respect for the DNC, said this long ago when it happened
-No idea about Creamer, haven't followed the story
-Trump is a buffoon because he started crying foul early on and has taking the stance that if he loses it's because it's rigged, but if he wins, then all is good
Ironic, usually when you are proved right or you make a good prediction you are giving credit but in 2016 since up is down. When you are proved right, you're still an idiot according to liberals whom were just proved wrong.😂
And they are the ones who are voting for the most morally bankrupt pos to ever run for office.
Rob is writing Bernie in his ballot.
http://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov//statewide-elections/2016-general/list-write-in-candidates.pdf
Rob was on our side the whole time! 😆