Originally posted by AncientPower
You're making his argument sound retarded when it really isn't. Some of the things he has claimed are definitely questionable but more than anything else the point he was putting across since the beginning is not at all farfetched. In fact I am awaiting an argument proving those other galactic scale factors wouldn't be factors at all.
You made like two threads exulting Vitiate for his galaxy-ritual that only needed open galactic war, a powerful nexus, and like billions (prob more like quadrillions) of simultaneous deaths, but try to mitigate another feat because maybe some political corruption (lol) helped it.
Frankly, the fact he had to deal with over half of your brigade at once and et his argument is still standing says a lot.
It isn't still standing, it's been thoroughly humiliated. He backtracked multiple times on his position, completely abandoned his original obsessing over dates, hilariously claimed that you can't make assumptions when explaining things (when we do that for literally every theory ever made), and then went on incoherent rants about how you need ">100% certainty" to use something in a debate.
I'm sorry, Ant's good, but he lost here. And he's not doing the Vitiate brigade any favors.
If you're going to actually debate him on the actual premise of his argument, don't bombard him with posts. That honestly looks really desperate, when we all know you could actually debate him properly instead of condescendingly demeaning a perfectly viable stance on his part.
Well you're trying to play cheerleader for your harshest critic by pretending that his primary position is that other factors contributed to the unbalancing, which he says occasionally but clearly isn't the only, or primary, claim that he's making.