How good will a Trump Presidency actually be?

Started by Flyattractor20 pages

Having lived thru the orginal Clinton-tatorship, it can only be PHENOMENAL when compared...

Originally posted by Beniboybling
7 votes for phenomenal, lmfao.

It's just as funny as 12 people saying he will be the worst president ever.

It's starting to look like Candidate Donald was for show. I'm okay with that.

Not crazy, no.

Originally posted by Surtur
Either they want him to do the shit he said or they don't.

If they do not, it's weird to try to mock him when he decides not to do these things...

*sigh* No, it isn't. There's more nuance to the point, which Neph tried to explain.

There is such thing as a lose-lose scenario, even if one "lose" is worse than the other. If someone appears to have attempted to blow up a building full of children, but in reality was just trolling around to scare the sh*t out of everyone, that's still a f*cking terrible thing to do. The fact that it's preferable to actually trying it doesn't magically make it a good thing.

Sounds like he's going to get tough on abortion. Regulations are good IMO. At-will abortion is BS, IMO, after all. But hoping he doesn't outright ban it when it is medically necessary.

Hopefully he'll soon announce his plan to slaughter millions of drug addicts. Like a good, Christian leader should do.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
*sigh* No, it isn't. There's more nuance to the point, which Neph tried to explain.

There is such thing as a lose-lose scenario, even if one "lose" is worse than the other. If someone appears to have attempted to blow up a building full of children, but in reality was just trolling around to scare the sh*t out of everyone, that's still a f*cking terrible thing to do. The fact that it's preferable to actually trying it doesn't magically make it a good thing.

Yeah Surtur's point is pretty dumb.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Hopefully he'll soon announce his plan to slaughter millions of drug addicts. Like a good, Christian leader should do.

Why the lash-y attitude, man? Did I say something that upset you?

Snip

Not sure if Lucien even realizes how bigoted his last comment was. To my nationality and my religion. I was tempted to reply in kind. But I'll go ahead and be the adult and let it slide.

I think a Trump presidency can be decent if the following criteria is met:

- Trump tells Paul Ryan to take his supply side/Austrian bullshit and **** himself.
- Trump controls his temper and doesn't act like a lunatic.
- Trump doesn't create a Supreme Court which gets rid of Roe vs Wade.
- Trump doesn't get us involved in stupid wars*.

I don't care about immigrants, I don't like BLM, and I don't like Muslims. He can screw over those three groups as much as he likes. Gays will be fine, Trump isn't going to do anything to them. Transgender people might whine, but frankly, while I'm sympathetic to people who suffer the condition, I'm sick of their brainwashing. All these young kids suddenly think they're transgender, because they're going through puberty and society is flooded with nonsense about gender fluidity.

* Russia and China are great powers. It's not unreasonable for them to expect to be able to bully their neighbors. Ukraine is historically part of Keivan Rus, and if Russia wants to take over the Baltic states, who cares? They're small and weak, tough shit. Read some Thucydides. If China wants to dominate the South China Sea? Whatever.

* For the Middle East, I say we let Russia prop up Assad. He's a dick, but he's secular. We should tell Erdogan to **** himself, because he's an Islamist shit head. The Kurds have been great allies, we shouldn't **** them over for Erdogan. They're like some of the only decent Muslims in the Middle East.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
*sigh* No, it isn't. There's more nuance to the point, which Neph tried to explain.

There is such thing as a lose-lose scenario, even if one "lose" is worse than the other. If someone appears to have attempted to blow up a building full of children, but in reality was just trolling around to scare the sh*t out of everyone, that's still a f*cking terrible thing to do. The fact that it's preferable to actually trying it doesn't magically make it a good thing.

These peoples posts are not nearly as nuanced and complex as you'd like to believe. It's just that..not everyone agree's with them. I know this is the entire problem people like you had with this election in the first place so..let me say that again: not everyone agree's with the things you say.

Some might find it to be a lose lose, I find it silly at this juncture in his presidency to feel anything for sure.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Yeah Surtur's point is pretty dumb.

What color are your pom pom's?

I'm just kidding, of course they are red white and blue.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Sounds like he's going to get tough on abortion. Regulations are good IMO. At-will abortion is BS, IMO, after all. But hoping he doesn't outright ban it when it is medically necessary.

I also do hope that he doesn't ban it and if he does ban it..to at least allow it when medically necessary or in cases of rape.

I know that will be rough on women when it comes to just abortion just for the sake of abortion. On the other hand, they have time to prepare for a Trump presidency. I don't think birth control pills are hard to come by. Condoms are things too that exist. Remember in Seinfeld how Elaine used that sponge? Oho! Good times indeed. Sarah Palin's kid sure seems to be favor abstinence, which seems to work really well for her.

Anyways so yeah, people could just try not banging dudes unless they want a kid or unless they have protection. Please don't laugh at my crazy solutions to problems.

The only silver lining is if it does happen that now men and women will be equally unable to shirk responsibility, as opposed to the hilariously not equal way they can now. I try to see the good(and the funny) in everything.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not acting like this is what I wanted all along. Well I did want for Hilary to lose, yes. But I had said before I wasn't quite sure what Trump would do, I was hopeful he would change some things, but I never pretended to truly know how Trump would behave as president.

As for the turd sandwich, it's clever. Good thing for those four years I'll have plenty of liberal tears to wash that sandwich down with, right?

In other news I hear California's drought ended overnight.

"delicious! just the way i like it!"

You know you'd think it tastes horrible, but all the salt from your tears really livens it up.

Plus bro who you kidding? I've eaten shitty hot lunches provided by a catholic grammar school with dwindling funds. At this point I can eat anything.

Also during the election I was the one who posted this clip multiple times:

YouTube video

I jumped on the shit sandwich train long before you did. You're just a shit sandwich copy cat.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"delicious! just the way i like it!"

Honestly, that does explain why you supported Hillary.

Oh shit I forgot the latest John Oliver episode should be up on youtube by now. I'm sure his tears are sweet.

I wonder if he'll try to mask his despair with humor.

I just love that part of the reason Trump won was because of push back against people like this lol.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Honestly, that does explain why you supported Hillary.

already said that, clever guy. 2 pages ago, in fact.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Democrats had to eat that sandwich after the dnc/dws scandal, but only had to chew on it for a few months, while yours will be a four year feast. Bon appetit 👆