Do SJWs suffer from mental illnesses?

Started by Surtur135 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: Self funded private party of black students is equivalent to 'Whites Only" schools, bathrooms, drinking fountains, forced sitting at the back of the bus, theater, stadiums etc., cos reasons

Who said it was equivalent? Am I not going by what your pal said? Your pal said it's only segregation if it is enforced. He said he goes by the definition of enforced in the dictionary, I gave it. Then we had "oh you stripped it of its context" meaning this Einstein does allow feelings to come into play when defining words. Unless you can find me a dictionary that has the word enforce and after the few definitions it has a "historical context" definition followed by the "true meaning". Which is apparently some unwritten definition we are all supposed to be aware of.

Now, if you want to play bullshit games and come back and act like I'm saying this is like Jim Crow or colored only water fountains, go ahead, but it just shows me you have no real argument.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh look the same semantics games. you're so clever to repeat it. that's a 5x combo pretend win you've racked up so far. keep it up, clownshoes.

I just love how the person who celebrates the most pretend victories spends so much time commenting on others supposed pretend victories.

Anyways, time for some funny, so from Steven Colberts show yesterday:

YouTube video

Just watch like the first 30 seconds. Colbert announces Comey just got fired and....lmao, his audience erupts in a loud cheer. You can see the confused look on his face, he tries to save it with "gee must be a lot of Trump fans here" (yes, you tell yourself that buddy). Then goes "well remember Comey is investigating Trump so..." Oh wait my bad he also talks about the Hilary email stuff. The Russia probe stuff comes later.

It's like they thought the wrong thing and he had to correct their wrongthink.

Didn't they realize they were supposed to stop hating Comey the moment Trump fired him? Those silly gooses. Thank god Colbert is there to correct them. Good thing they remembered to boo at the mention of Jeff Sessions name though.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nor did you unless....pop quiz! Whites show up at the all blacks ceremony. They refuse to leave: are they removed? Or allowed to stay?

Allowed to stay, right? Because it's not enforced segregation, and remember we go by the dictionary definition of "enforced" bro. So you can't even skate by on saying you just mean enforcement by the law. Sucks, but I don't make the rules.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/health/harvard-black-commencement-ceremony-trnd/

"It's truly about fellowship. We invite anybody to come to learn about the black, African, and African diaspora experience at Harvard. This event is truly about building relationships," Huggins said."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/05/08/black-grad-students-harvard-hold-own-commencement-ceremony/6tGHbUjyz8vLvDNVZwzidL/story.html

"But the ceremony is “not about segregation,” said Michael Huggins, president of the Harvard Black Graduate Student Alliance, which is organizing the event. Students of all racial and ethnic backgrounds may attend, he said, and the black students taking part in the ceremony also plan to attend the university’s official commencement on May 25 in Harvard Yard."

Apparently not. 👆

Strongly consider suicide lad. 😄

surt, have you ever considered attempting to acomplish stuff in your life, so that you have more to be proud of than being born white?

Originally posted by Surtur
Who said it was equivalent? Am I not going by what your pal said? Your pal said it's only segregation if it is enforced. He said he goes by the definition of enforced in the dictionary, I gave it. Then we had "oh you stripped it of its context" meaning this Einstein does allow feelings to come into play when defining words. Unless you can find me a dictionary that has the word enforce and after the few definitions it has a "historical context" definition followed by the "true meaning". Which is apparently some unwritten definition we are all supposed to be aware of.

Now, if you want to play bullshit games and come back and act like I'm saying this is like Jim Crow or colored only water fountains, go ahead, but it just shows me you have no real argument.

So back to more "I never specifically said!" tactics, despite you obviously implying it over and over with like-comparison arguments. Joy. Grow a pair and stand by your convictions, will ya.

"It's truly about fellowship. We invite anybody to come to learn about the black, African, and African diaspora experience at Harvard. This event is truly about building relationships," Huggins said."

Oh man, Surtur's really having a bad week. Lol

inb4 "i was just being hypothetical clown"

Originally posted by NemeBro
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/health/harvard-black-commencement-ceremony-trnd/

"It's truly about fellowship. [b]We invite anybody to come to learn about the black, African, and African diaspora experience at Harvard. This event is truly about building relationships," Huggins said."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/05/08/black-grad-students-harvard-hold-own-commencement-ceremony/6tGHbUjyz8vLvDNVZwzidL/story.html

"But the ceremony is “not about segregation,” said Michael Huggins, president of the Harvard Black Graduate Student Alliance, which is organizing the event. Students of all racial and ethnic backgrounds may attend, he said, and the black students taking part in the ceremony also plan to attend the university’s official commencement on May 25 in Harvard Yard."

Apparently not. 👆

Strongly consider suicide lad. 😄 [/B]

Fair enough, I concede you are correct. Though still an overall piece of shit.

Now that's some bitter butthurt

Originally posted by Robtard
Now that's some bitter butthurt

Not really, just truth. Your pals have called me similar and worse things and you didn't show up immediately to say it was butthurt.

But Surtur, you just conceded that you were wrong all along after pages of flips and nonsense and instead of being a good sport about being proven wrong, you call the person a turd.

Like the kid who gets tagged out early in a game of dodge ball and instead of letting the other kids continue playing, he stomps his little feet, grabs his ball and storms off home.

#poorsportsmanship
#hewilllgrowuptobeacuckforsure

Originally posted by Robtard
But Surtur, you just conceded that you were wrong all along after pages of flips and nonsense and instead of being a good sport about being proven wrong, you call the person a turd.

I was wrong about them allowing whites. I was not wrong about Bash's trainwreck that was the "enforced" incident.

But wait, this person literally told me to consider suicide. Is that being a good sport in your definition?

EDIT: So just saw edited part. Well no it's not like that. You are talking about someone not allowing others to play. I didn't not allow debate. I called someone who told me to kill myself(not for the first time) a piece of shit. That is just the behavior I have observed from this person.

It was a metaphor and/or allegory about poor sportsmanship, sport

You're that little kid.

See my edit, and your response failed to address the whole suicide thing, why? This person has a habit of telling people to die, kill themselves, etc.

I think it's fair game to say: this person was right about this issue, but still a piece of shit.

Originally posted by Robtard
It was a metaphor about poor sportsmanship, sport

You're that little kid.

Poor sportsmanship? So okay, I ask again: why isn't telling someone to kill themselves poor sportsmanship? This makes no sense to me lol.

I saw it before and my response remains the same. Like the song.

Originally posted by Robtard
I saw it before and my response remains the same. Like the song.

So again, to use your sports analogy, you feel it is not poor sportsmanship if a team wins a game and tells the team that lost to consider killing themselves? I just want to be clear here on what you are saying.

Originally posted by Surtur
So again, to use your sports analogy, you feel it is not poor sportsmanship if a team wins a game and tells the team that lost to consider killing themselves? I just want to be clear here on what you are saying.

In the general sense, that would make one a very sore winner. But you're ignoring the context of the specific 'game' here so let me assist you:

This would be the winning team telling the other team to hang themselves after the losing team spent the entire match using shit tactics, falsely crying foul, accusing the other team of cheating and acting like whiny little b!thces every time they fell a point behind.

Now I'm not saying the winning team is outright justified, but I absolutely understand the position they're coming from.