Do SJWs suffer from mental illnesses?

Originally posted by Robtard
In the general sense, that would make one a very sore winner.

But you're ignoring the context of the specific 'game' here so let me assist you: This would be the winning team telling the other team to hang themselves after the losing team spent the entire match using shit tactics, falsely crying foul, accusing the other team of cheating and acting like whiny little b!thces every time they fell a point behind.

Now I'm not saying the winning team is outright justified, but I absolutely understand the position they're coming from.

Lol right and let me guess, you don't understand the position I'm coming from, having been told this(kill yourself) more than once by this person?

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol right and let me guess, you don't understand the position I'm coming from, having been told this(kill yourself) more than once by this person?

Incorrect. I understand as it's easy to see (not relate too, mind you), you were proven wrong over and over, acted like an ass and then when you were finally forced to submit to your superior, you lashed out like a sore loser.

I thought that was clear before?

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect. I understand as it's easy to see (not relate too, mind you), you were proven wrong over and over, acted like an ass and then when you were finally forced to submit to your superior, you lashed out like a sore loser.

I thought that was clear before?

Lol, so no you don't see it. Okie dokie, all you needed to say.

And Nemebro is nobody's superior. Least of all on KMC.

EDIT: And btw, it wasn't entirely clear before. I thought maybe you were showing some promise in more or less saying it was an example of sore winning. But oh well, I guess I was wrong...back to your same old trolling self, okay.

Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel correct after it's clear you're not. Now have your last word on this matter so you can feel victorious.

(Expecting an "irony" or "no you!" type response)

Originally posted by Robtard
Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel correct after it's clear you're not. Now have your last word on this matter so you can feel victorious.

(Expecting an "irony" or "no you!" type response)

To feel correct about what? I admitted I was wrong, so to say I'm suddenly trying to act like I won the argument is strange.

You went with a strawman-like tactic by pretending I was referring to something else. Didn't call that one, kudos.

Originally posted by Robtard
You went with a strawman-like tactic by pretending I was referring to something else. Didn't call that one, kudos.

Er no, I thought that was what you were referring to. The debate was the only thing I could be clearly correct or incorrect on. Anything else is just opinion, not fact. You aren't dumb enough to try to present your opinion as fact.

You know what, I'll own up to it, telling Surtur to kill himself in this instance was poor form and unjustifiable. 👆

So sorry Surtur, I shouldn't have gone that far. 👇

See Surtur, that's a humble winner. Can you try and be a graceful loser?

I suppose I can: I apologize for some of the tactics I used.

you're a bag of childish tactics, so you should be more specific.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're a bag of childish tactics, so you should be more specific.

Irony overload right here. Good stuff.

At least we get to go back to the standard bullshit now, right Bash? So you go on and come talk about pretend victories some more.

Lol well shit given the last debate...should I even dare? Yeah, I'm gonna:

College Gives Students of Color Extension on Exams, ‘Sanctuary’ Cafe After ‘Racist’ Gorilla Incident

So yeah, before I comment this time I'm going to let others peruse the story and respond first if they want. I'll check back sometime tomorrow to see the results.

I will say it seems like a hoax, some in the comments appear to agree.

Originally posted by Surtur
Irony overload right here. Good stuff.

standard "no you" reply #3 does not apply here. i dont do argue exclusively via coping mechanisms like you, surt.
for example, i never need to express my mood as part of my argument.
oh and i don't need to wallow in denial of reputable news sources, call them "fake news", and after
having spent a year trusting a wiki-links document dump as verified gospel truth.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
standard "no you" reply #3 does not apply here. i dont do argue exclusively via coping mechanisms like you, surt.
for example, i never need to express my mood as part of my argument.
oh and i don't need to wallow in denial of reputable news sources, call them "fake news", and after
having spent a year trusting a wiki-links document dump as verified gospel truth.

Lol dude, just stop. You utilize childish tactics ALL THE TIME.

We saw it in this very thread a few pages ago. Make no mistake, Nemebro was right about the story, but you were 100% f*cktarded with your "enforced" debacle. Full stop, someone who isn't childish does not patronizingly go "I don't feel definitions, I go by the dictionary" and then when you go with that version go "oh you're forgetting the context and true meaning! Semantics!".

You were using ya fee fee's for the definition. It's cool. I'm going to have mercy on you and drop this because it's clear that while even I on occasion can admit some of my own failings, you are completely incapable of any self reflection at all.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol dude, just stop.

reaction formation. (implying that your emotional response supports your argument.)

Originally posted by Surtur
You utilize childish tactics ALL THE TIME.

projection. (accusing others of doing what you yourself compulsively do)

Originally posted by Surtur
We saw it in this very thread a few pages ago. Make no mistake, Nemebro was right about the story, but you were 100% f*cktarded with your "enforced" debacle.

-displacement. (you can't formulate a sober argument, or produce a discernible shred of evidence, so apparently "f*cktarded" will have to serve as proof that you're right.)

[oh and nice job trying to use nemebro as a shield. don't know why he apologized before since i think he gave you good council.]

Originally posted by Surtur
Full stop, someone who isn't childish does not patronizingly go "I don't feel definitions, I go by the dictionary" and then when you go with that version go "oh you're forgetting the context and true meaning! Semantics!".

lying/misrepresenting (a.k.a. phaggotry) - you were cherrypicking a multi-definition word, trying to apply the non-relevant meaning (segregating apples from oranges) while ignoring the relevant one. (jim crow segregation laws) now you're lying about it.

Originally posted by Surtur
you were using ya fee fee's for the definition. It's cool.

more projection. i was properly applying the word while you were emotionally involved in misapplying it to prove that blacks-only party equals jim crow laws.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm going to have mercy on you and drop this because it's clear

pretend win #34021

Originally posted by Surtur
that while even I on occasion can admit some of my own failings, you are completely incapable of any self reflection at all.

yet more projection. i never deny my actions/words , while you literally just overlooked/ignored and by extension denied your own actions in your hissy fit reply.) which leads us to:

infant tactic #4 - denial. your acceptance of a wikilinks dump as gospel while dismissing reputable sources as "fake news". of course you wouldnt address that since it's the truth, you know it, and you're a spineless coward who can't fess up to it. but i don't need to sell that point since everyone saw you do it, and you look like even more of a pathetic sniveling child for denying it.

Lol dude I'm not going to address everything you say because you spout utter insanity at times. You shrug off most criticism with "projection!". Which, okay? Not sure what you expect to be said to that. You see me projecting, I see you floating me more bullshit excuses.

Then I see you saying shit about me lying, cherry picking stuff, what nonsense is this? I cherry picked a "multi definition" word? See? This is why responding to every single word you type is a waste of time. You have said I try to distort stuff, but you are doing it right here, right now.

Is there even a point? I know you'll say "derp, you just gotta dodge because you have nothing to say" but seriously, you just reply with bullshit about projecting or semantics. Just look at the cherry picking comment. I cherry picked a multi-definition word? You said you go by "the dictionary". You did not go "Yeah, I go by the 4th definition in the dictionary". You said you go by the dictionary. So here:

1. to put or keep in force; compel obedience to:
to enforce a rule; Traffic laws will be strictly enforced.
2.to obtain (payment, obedience, etc.) by force or compulsion.
3. to impose (a course of action) upon a person:
The doctor enforced a strict dietary regimen.
4. to support (a demand, claim, etc.) by force:
to enforce one's rights as a citizen.
5. to impress or urge (an argument, contention, etc.) forcibly; lay stress upon:
He enforced his argument by adding details.

If I'm cherry picking from it....I mean, I want to ask you how you wouldn't be doing the same thing if there is apparently a different definition you go by, but which out of the 5 I just showed do you officially go by?

*double post*

keep replying to half my post (and lying about it) because you're too much of a spineless pussy to address the rest.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i never need to express my mood as part of my argument.
oh and i don't need to wallow in denial of reputable news sources, call them "fake news", and after
having spent a year trusting a wiki-links document dump as verified gospel truth.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg

infant tactic #4 - denial. your acceptance of a wikilinks dump as gospel while dismissing reputable sources as "fake news". of course you wouldnt address that

you must regard yourself as the most special snowflake on earth if you think you can just brush over such gross schenanigans and then presume to instruct others in debating.

continue proving me correct by pretending i never raised the point 3x, you gutless worm.

Lmao, cuz it's not worth addressing? Like, what reputable news source have I said puts out 100% fake news?