Something mildly amusing:
Liberal Rep. Maxine Waters gets blindsided with dose of her own ‘impeachment’ medicine at town hall
I guess they are trolling her with stuff like this:
Now something with Joss Whedon:
Hollywood elitist uses dead mother to bash Trump’s America on Mother’s Day
“Today I gratefully give my mother the gift of having been dead for 25 years and not having to see what a tub of f**kery our country’s become,” is what he tweeted lol.
It's nice to see some in the media with a little bit of sense:
Tom Brokaw takes NBC anchor to school over real journalism and destroys liberal narrative on Comey
👆
Anyways:
Liberals Attack New Miss USA For Her ‘Problematic Views’ on Feminism, Healthcare
Before I say anything else I'm just going to post the first sentence of the article because it is awesome:
"Nuclear scientist Kara McCullough was crowned Miss USA this Sunday in Las Vegas. "
Anyways, here is what she said that offended people, so I'm going to give a trigger warning to anyone reading. Warning: differing views from yours might be expressed.
"When asked if healthcare was a right or a privilege, McCullough responded saying it was a privilege.
“I’m definitely going to say it’s a privilege,” McCullough said. “As a government employee, I am granted healthcare and I see firsthand that for one to have healthcare you need to have jobs so therefore we need to cultivate this environment that we’re given the opportunity to have healthcare as well as jobs to all the American citizens worldwide.”
Damn, monstrous.
"She also had a “problematic” answer on feminism.
“As a woman scientist in the government, I’d like to transpose the word feminism to equalism,” she said. “I try not to consider myself this diehard, like, I don’t really care about men. But one thing I want to say is that women are just as equal to men when it comes to opportunity in the workplace.”
Feminists do not like the word "equalism" because then it's not all about them anymore.
FFS, Surtur, you had a busy weekend it seems.
Also it seems if you work anywhere in Hollywood and you're not pro-Trump, you're automatically labeled a "Hollywood Elitist" by the pro-Trump crowd. Odd and hilarious because I have a feeling those people don't know what "elitist" means, it's just another buzz-word they toss. 'Antifa!" "SJW!" "Elitist!"
Originally posted by Robtard
FFS, Surtur, you had a busy weekend it seems.
Everyone has to have a hobby! 😆
Originally posted by RobtardAlso it seems if you work anywhere in Hollywood and you're not pro-Trump, you're automatically labeled a "Hollywood Elitist" by the pro-Trump crowd. Odd and hilarious because I have a feeling those people don't know what "elitist" means, it's just another buzz-word they toss. 'Antifa!" "SJW!" "Elitist!"
I have a feeling you are right about "those" people, I suspect most of them have no idea what "much" means.
Originally posted by Robtard
FFS, Surtur, you had a busy weekend it seems.Also it seems if you work anywhere in Hollywood and you're not pro-Trump, you're automatically labeled a "Hollywood Elitist" by the pro-Trump crowd. Odd and hilarious because I have a feeling those people don't know what "elitist" means, it's just another buzz-word they toss. 'Antifa!" "SJW!" "Elitist!"
I did have a somewhat busy weekend, but not because of this stuff...which took like 10 minutes. It seems like that is the tactic now, dismiss it by implying I spent many hours on this stuff.
As for Hollywood, yep. If you're a conservative you can be in trouble, that is a thing that exists, though not with every single anti-Trumper.
This video is quite depressing, but people should watch:
Afghanistan, Libya and Iran Before and After Islam 1979/2017
Originally posted by Surtur
I did have a somewhat busy weekend, but not because of this stuff...which took like 10 minutes. It seems like that is the tactic now, dismiss it by implying I spent many hours on this stuff.As for Hollywood, yep. If you're a conservative you can be in trouble, that is a thing that exists, though not with every single anti-Trumper.
Timestamps show a much busier schedule than 10mins, but okay. Not a big deal.
Huh? Not sure what you're talking about. Anyhow, to what I said in regards to any Hollywood-type not being a staunch pro-Trumper being labeled, Whedon's comment did not mention Trump, it seems like a general state of things in the US he's gripping about. But the sensitive people at The Blaze had to twist his comment into an anti-Trump thing and then complain that their precious tangerine idol was attacked. They literally created a mess that did not previously exist and then cried about the said mess.
Serious question: why do you keep buying into these obvious shit frivolous stories?
Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Everyone has to have a hobby! 😆I have a feeling you are right about "those" people, I suspect most of them have no idea what "much" means.
Yeah, fair enough
Whedon's comment didn't mention Trump. Would honestly like someone to explain how Joss Whedon is a "Hollywood Elitist". Like give me comments he's made/stances he's supported to support that stance. I bet they can't, they just label as a means to demean and dismiss.
Originally posted by Robtard
Timestamps show a much busier schedule than 10mins, but okay. Not a big deal.Huh? Not sure what you're talking about. Anyhow, to what I said in regards to any Hollywood-type not being a staunch pro-Trumper being labeled, Whedon's comment did not mention Trump, it seems like a general state of things in the US he's gripping about. But the sensitive people at The Blaze had to twist his comment into an anti-Trump thing and then complain that their precious tangerine idol was attacked. They literally created a mess that did not previously exist and then cried about the said mess.
Serious question: why do you keep buying into these obvious shit frivolous stories?
What timestamps show how long it takes to put together posts? Where is this busy schedule? Don't talk nonsense. The post took 10 minutes to put together. If the implication is I post frequently, bro: your pals here post just as frequently, they just have invisible mode on. But they post a lot. So IMO this insult should be dropped. Feel free to keep using it, but if we're truly going to go down that road of "you post a lot" as an insult, well...opens up all kinds of doors, not only for calling out others, but for the hypocrisy that will come when they claim it's somehow different. Just pointing out that truth, sadly, has the potential to cause a multi-page debate about posting habits. Best to be avoided IMO, but your call.
Whedon didn't mention Trump, but I'd bet dollars to donuts he was referring to him mostly.
As for buying into them, my above sentence should answer that, I agreed that this was an overt reference to Trump. I think if you ask any liberal what is wrong with this country the first thing they say is Trump.
EDIT: Also getting into buying into stuff, do you have a problem when people buy into stuff from anonymous sources? Like this story of Trump demanding Comey give a loyalty oath at a dinner. No evidence other than an "anonymous source" yet this has been treated as more or less true. How is it people can whine at me for believing wikileaks and yet the masses buy into any bullshit the NYT puts out even if it has zero evidence? Cuz it was the NYT who first put it out. Yet if I criticize the NYT? "Oh dem DNC emails!".
EDIT: Whedon meant different tweet.
Was gonna edit once more, but we only get 15 minutes to edit posts after posting.
So Rob what do you think about this story:
Students Refuse to Take Exams After Photo of Classmate Wearing ‘Blackface’ Resurfaces
Two questions:
1-Do you think the postponement of the classes should have been immediately cancelled upon the true nature of the event happening?
2-If this incident was real and it was truly an old picture of a white student in black face, is this legit reason to post pone exams?
Originally posted by SurturI said "no big deal", as in it's not something worth arguing, spend your time as you see fit, it's yours.
What timestamps show how long it takes to put together posts? Where is this busy schedule? Don't talk nonsense. The post took 10 minutes to put together. If the implication is I post frequently, bro: your pals here post just as frequently, they just have invisible mode on. But they post a lot. So IMO this insult should be dropped. Feel free to keep using it, but if we're truly going to go down that road of "you post a lot" as an insult, well...opens up all kinds of doors, not only for calling out others, but for the hypocrisy that will come when they claim it's somehow different. Just pointing out that truth, sadly, has the potential to cause a multi-page debate about posting habits. Best to be avoided IMO, but your call.Whedon didn't mention Trump, but I'd bet dollars to donuts he was referring to him mostly.
As for buying into them, my above sentence should answer that, I agreed that this was an overt reference to Trump. I think if you ask any liberal what is wrong with this country the first thing they say is Trump.
EDIT: Also getting into buying into stuff, do you have a problem when people buy into stuff from anonymous sources? Like this story of Trump demanding Comey give a loyalty oath at a dinner. No evidence other than an "anonymous source" yet this has been treated as more or less true. How is it people can whine at me for believing wikileaks and yet the masses buy into any bullshit the NYT puts out even if it has zero evidence? Cuz it was the NYT who first put it out. Yet if I criticize the NYT? "Oh dem DNC emails!".
EDIT: Whedon meant different tweet.
See, you're (as they are) are using your feelings instead of going with the facts. Facts: Whedon didn't mention Trump. So why assume he did and complain about something that really doesn't even exist?
I don't mind that as the story is developing, but it shouldn't be used as a fact until it is. I've also not seen any news source push it as absolute truth(do you have a source that has?). It should also be noted that it does sound like something Trump would do considering his personality, so it's not a crazy stretch of the imagination.
Originally posted by Robtard
I said "no big deal", as in it's not something worth arguing, spend your time as you see fit, it's yours.
Sure, the point was that the sentiment could be applied to multiple posters here.
See, you're (as they are) are using your feelings instead of going with the facts. Facts: Whedon didn't mention Trump. So why assume he did and complain about something that really doesn't even exist?
We're in the age of feelings over facts bro. But okay(I'm jk), I criticize that stuff so I don't want to be like it, I'm not going to say I am 100% sure he meant Trump. But IMO he did.
I don't mind that as the story is developing, but it shouldn't be used as a fact until it is. I've also not seen any news source push it as absolute truth(do you have a source that has?). It should also be noted that it does sound like something Trump would do considering his personality, so it's not a crazy stretch of the imagination.
I don't know if anyone said "it's 100% fact!" but it's been picked up by multiple other media sources, and handed around as something true. They can't have it as 100% fact because it's an anonymous source lol.
So I mean, like I said...if we should be questioning the DNC wikileak emails people should be questioning this, yet they aren't. Also saying "it seems like something Trump would do" is using your feelings, correct? It's not a crazy stretch of the imagination to think Whedon meant Trump either.
EDIT: For instance, the shit in the DNC wikileaks? Totally believable they'd behave that way, if we're going with "well it sounds like something they would do" as part of an argument.
Originally posted by Robtard
FFS, Surtur, you had a busy weekend it seems.Also it seems if you work anywhere in Hollywood and you're not pro-Trump, you're automatically labeled a "Hollywood Elitist" by the pro-Trump crowd. Odd and hilarious because I have a feeling those people don't know what "elitist" means, it's just another buzz-word they toss. 'Antifa!" "SJW!" "Elitist!"
Would someone with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame not be a "Hollywood elitist?"