Originally posted by Surtur
I know, I should go to CNN instead. *Goes*Trump got 2 scoops of ice cream? Damn! That's the hard hitting stuff.
Well no, I wasn't saying where you should go, just that you should lay off the heatst.com/culture-wars, it's not good for you
So I took your challenge and went to CNN; the top story is:
"Comey Memo: Trump asked me to bury Flynn investigation".
😂 You voted for Trump.
Men stealthing=bad
Women stealthing=not so much, and you can end up paying child support still apparently, because the world is upside down
Good stuff.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well no, I wasn't saying where you should go, just that you should lay off the heatst.com/culture-wars, it's not good for youSo I took your challenge and went to CNN; the top story is:
"Comey Memo: Trump asked me to bury Flynn investigation".
😂 You voted for Trump.
You say you took my challenge? But, did CNN not report about the 2 scoop debacle?
Also yes, I did vote for Trump. I still would.
Originally posted by Robtard
I understand you need to make it seem like CNN only focuses on Trump's ridiculous diet, cos deflection is the only defense of Trump. But lolz dude, seems Trump actively interred with an investigation and you're cool with it. 😂
I see, so I never said they only focus on that, and merely up brought up the utter sadness of them reporting on it.
Go on, it's time again for *you* to respond and tell me what I really meant.
Originally posted by Surtur
I see, so I never said they only focus on that, and merely up brought up the utter sadness of them reporting on it.Go on, it's time again for *you* to respond and tell me what I really meant.
but conveniently you have no opinion to offer on the topic. "but the media". why not just say nothing if your intention is to say nothing?
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, this guy. The very nature of wikileaks means the emails can't be confirmed, but those are gospel to you.
Okay so Rob, pick a side. Do not cite shit from an anonymous source and then later whine about wikileaks.
Choose a side: one side has the wikileaks gone as evidence, but also has any anonymous source any network wants to use.
We can go with what is being said by the NYT as true, but then no more talk of wikileaks. Or we can say neither are true, in which no more talk of stories with anonymous sources. Choose, go.
the memo was not published, but rather leaked from one of it's recipients who gave it to the new york times. however it's not classified, so i wouldnt be surprised if we see it soon, but not in its entirety since comey probably makes a note in the same memoir when he takes a shit.
trump was quoted as saying: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,â€, the day after flynn was canned.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the memo was not published, but rather leaked from one of it's recipients who gave it to the new york times. however it's not classified, so i wouldnt be surprised if we see it soon, but not in its entirety since comey probably makes a note in the same memoir when he takes a shit.
So in other words no evidence, okie dokie.
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so Rob, pick a side. Do not cite shit from an anonymous source and then later whine about wikileaks.Choose a side: one side has the wikileaks gone as evidence, but also has any anonymous source any network wants to use.
We can go with what is being said by the NYT as true, but then no more talk of wikileaks. Or we can say neither are true, in which no more talk of stories with anonymous sources. Choose, go.
This post of yours is critical mass levels of irony.
Anyhow, I'm waiting for the Comey memo story to develop more.