Study Finds That Illegal Voters Have Influenced Election Results

Speaking of voter fraud:

Trump supporter charged with voting twice in Iowa

A woman in Iowa was arrested this week on suspicion of voting twice in the general election, court and police records show.

Terri Lynn Rote, a 55-year-old Des Moines resident, was booked Thursday on a first-degree charge of election misconduct, according to Polk County Jail records. The charge is considered a Class D felony under Iowa state law. -snip

Rote told Iowa Public Radio that she cast her first ballot for Trump but feared it would be changed to a vote for Hillary Clinton.

“The polls are rigged,” Rote told the radio station.-snip

Full Story

Oh LoL, these Trumpers. "I cheated to stop the cheating!"

Originally posted by Robtard
Speaking of voter fraud:

Trump supporter charged with voting twice in Iowa

A woman in Iowa was arrested this week on suspicion of voting twice in the general election, court and police records show.

Terri Lynn Rote, a 55-year-old Des Moines resident, was booked Thursday on a first-degree charge of election misconduct, according to Polk County Jail records. The charge is considered a Class D felony under Iowa state law. -snip

Rote told Iowa Public Radio that she cast her first ballot for Trump but feared it would be changed to a vote for Hillary Clinton.

“The polls are rigged,” Rote told the radio station.-snip

Full Story

Oh LoL, these Trumpers. "I cheated to stop the cheating!"

She should be fully prosecuted to the fullest extent of Voting Fraud laws in Iowa. Then she should have little to no jail time and, instead, be fined out the wazoo. 🙂

Illegal immigrants are used to determine the electoral college so they have had influence for a long time now in elections.

Originally posted by dadudemon
She should be fully prosecuted to the fullest extent of Voting Fraud laws in Iowa. Then she should have little to no jail time and, instead, be fined out the wazoo. 🙂

Of course if we're going to speak of voter fraud it needs to be pointed out it wasn't only Trump supporters who did it this election.

I feel like they all indeed should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Even $50 thumbprint scanners have stepped up their game such that it can sense that the impedance matches human flesh (to keep people from using pieces of paper with lifted prints).

The number of people who are going to try and trick even a cheap and decent finger print scanner are very few and far between. Also, the additional layer of security while also increasing the speed at which people can vote would be a nice draw. The additional layer of automatically rejecting a voter (which could be done on the backend without the voter knowing) will also prevent voter fraud.

Don't have a finger? Then you can do the in person registration voting stuff like they do for the disabled, already.

Here is a company that is already mass-producing biometric devices for voting:

http://www.m2sys.com/automated-fingerprint-identification-system-afis-voter-registration/

YouTube video

Trust me...2 million illegal immigrants trying to vote will not try to scan their fingers into a government database...very few of them are dumb enough to indirectly register themselves as voting fraudsters.

The issue isn't the ability to reject votes from ineligible voters. The issue would be rejecting votes from people who are eligible by flagging them as ineligible without their knowledge and for false reasons then later claiming mistakes were made after the outcome of the election. The fact that you could devise a system where that eligible person thinks they've voted and has no feedback on whether their vote has been accepted or not is even more open to abuse. You could reject the votes of entire communities.

Are we talking false positives? Or tampering?

Because on the latter, why not assume the whole thing's rigged anyways? Why would a fingerprint reader be uniquely subject to tampering vs what we have now?