Originally posted by quanchi112
Despite my position Maul is greater than Ahsoka DMB is 110 percent accurate with you need to specifically counter his argument. Calling someone stupid or a wanker without addressing anything specifically isn't refuting anything. That's how debating works. Why do people insist on coming into this site without actually debating. It's a massive waste of time if you don't want to truly engage someone point by point to come here.
DMB didn't bring anything forward so why should I counter anything? You bring forward an argument and a person respons to it, that's how debating works.
Originally posted by DarthDuelist9His points have merit. If you call someone a wanker it's a baseless claim unless you can show with evidence why he's a wanker and his points are weak. Prove they are weak don't just casually dismiss them by your opinion alone.
DMB didn't bring anything forward so why should I counter anything? You bring forward an argument and a person respons to it, that's how debating works.
The fact was though that you threw around false accusations like calling him a "wanker" just because he said Ahsoka being superior to Maul is a defensible position.
Even if you proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's not what you would still be rude and unjustifiably arrogant. Not that it would matter since you're incapable of debating at that level.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Damn DD9, you're claiming nobody takes Joker's position seriously... but it seems clear from the past page that it's you that people don't take seriously, not Joker's position.
You mean someone like Beni or you? Or perhaps Syn (if that's what he's called)? So we have the entire Ahsoka brigade (besides Syn) not accepting an argument that would be negatively for Ahsoka...hmmm weird.