Trump apparently is Time's person of the year.

But nobody said it was an accolade. I said he was trying to taint it, not smear Trump.

It was pointed out repeatedly why I liked this. But because you know people will be butthurt over this all you can cling to is this silly notion.

If you have to tell yourself you or Beni dropped some kind of revelation in this topic..okay, you do you.

Can't really deny the impact that Trump has had this year. Makes perfect sense for him to get this "honor".

Agreed.

This is not an honor, it simply means Trump has been the most impactful figure of 2016...

I rememeber when that dude "moot" was person of the year.

Some quality butthurt has begun:

Why the Radioactive Space Monster Is Time’s Person of the Year for 2019

78-Year Streak Of A White Supremacist Not Being Person Of The Year Ends

lol.

Reposted since people are literally and figuratively trying to turn the page:

Originally posted by Robtard
Case in point:
Surtur tried doing that to Beni, claiming he was attempting to smear and rob Trump of some victory; when Beni was just explaining what it means to win.

[QUOTE=16043076]Originally posted by Surtur
[B]LMAO, you've tried and failed to taint this. Trump is man of the year, and it's hilarious.

Just hilarious 🙂

[/B][/QUOTE]

Surtur, why are you whining about people "supposedly" whining when you just pointed out that you'd whine if they weren't? And when you accused someone of "smearing" Trump's award, you implied that it was a positive nomination and then turn around and deny that praising Trump was your intention.

All in all, reading through this thread, I suggest you collect your thoughts and stance on a matter before you post.

Trump might win the most influential person of the year award. This does not mean it's a positive nomination as they highlighted his failings. Pointing this out to someone does not automatically constitute as Trump hating, being a liberal, SJW or whatever. Simply a noted fact. If people paid more attention, no one would be complaining about this choice and no one would be bragging about it either.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Surtur, why are you whining about people "supposedly" whining

Who is whining about them whining? Say shit that makes sense. If I said I'd enjoy the tears..how is it whining?

when you just pointed out that you'd whine if they weren't? And when you accused someone of "smearing" Trump's award, you implied that it was a positive nomination and then turn around and deny that praising Trump was your intention.

I said he was trying to taint the fact Trump got it, I never said it meant Trump was a good person. I also further explained what I meant in other posts, and yet people continue this..I wonder why?

All in all, reading through this thread, I suggest you collect your thoughts and stance on a matter before you post.

This is advice a lot of posters here need, yeah?

Trump might win the most influential person of the year award. This does not mean it's a positive nomination as they highlighted his failings. Pointing this out to someone does not automatically constitute as Trump hating, being a liberal, SJW or whatever. Simply a noted fact. If people paid more attention, no one would be complaining about this choice and no one would be bragging about it either.

Nobody said this meant he was good. Literally nobody. I already explained what I meant by my taint comment, so why are people still whining I said it's good while in the same post telling me to collect my thoughts? Shouldn't you perhaps collect yours? Instead of trying to grasp at the fact I think this means Trump is a good person(I don't, and explained this several times) why not..accept my explanation and move on?

So I've explained what I meant now, multiple times. So are you going to sit there and try to continue to tell me what I meant or..what?

More gold from Time lol.

http://time.com/4590994/popular-vote-tax-pledge/

If you voted for Hilary..don't pay taxes until democracy is restored. Bwahahaah.

Oh sorry shit I didn't mean to shift the discussion from my taint comment! My bad. Who'd be crazy enough to wanna change the subject of something that's already been explained? Continue.

Here's where you claimed that you'd whine if people didn't whine about Trump getting Time's POTY:

Originally posted by Surtur

I want this to happen, there is no whining over it. I'd be upset if they didn't whine. I'd whine over a lack of whining. You dig?

But please, continue to try strawman Rage of Olympus.

Okay I wasn't being serious about that lol. I wouldn't have actually been upset if they didn't whine.

But hey you keep grasping at those straws.

So let's see how intelligent you are Rob. I've explained the taint comment, and I've addressed the quote you just posted. An intelligent person would realize there isn't anything more to say. Are you going to show you're intelligent? Or will you just try to continually steer this topic in another direction?

It's a win win for me either way, but I am curious if you're going to continually try to tell me what I meant. Oh I understand the misunderstanding, let's see if you can understand the explanation, yeah?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Surtur, why are you whining about people "supposedly" whining when you just pointed out that you'd whine if they weren't? And when you accused someone of "smearing" Trump's award, you implied that it was a positive nomination and then turn around and deny that praising Trump was your intention.

All in all, reading through this thread, I suggest you collect your thoughts and stance on a matter before you post.

Trump might win the most influential person of the year award. This does not mean it's a positive nomination as they highlighted his failings. Pointing this out to someone does not automatically constitute as Trump hating, being a liberal, SJW or whatever. Simply a noted fact. If people paid more attention, no one would be complaining about this choice and no one would be bragging about it either.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay I wasn't being serious about that lol. I wouldn't have actually been upset if they didn't whine.

But hey you keep grasping at those straws.

So let's see how intelligent you are Rob. I've explained the taint comment, and I've addressed the quote you just posted. An intelligent person would realize there isn't anything more to say. Are you going to show you're intelligent? Or will you just try to continually steer this topic in another direction?

It's a win win for me either way, but I am curious if you're going to continually try to tell me what I meant. Oh I understand the misunderstanding, let's see if you can understand the explanation, yeah?

So when your nonsense is pointed out you resort to "I was just kidding", good one, sport.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Surtur rarely if ever makes sense and his positions get goofier the more he responds. I don't think he has a rational mind by any stretch of the imagination.

Okay but you see when someone like you says this..you realize it's just the pot calling the kettle black, correct?

Originally posted by Robtard
So when your nonsense is pointed out you resort to "I was just kidding", good one, sport.

I wasn't being serious about saying I'd whine over whining. So again, are you going to continue to grasp at straws even though an explanation has given?

Are you intelligent, yay or nay?

If you don't believe my explanation that's fine, but then..there's nothing more to say then, correct?

Now you're trying to confuse the point again. You said you'd whine if people didn't whine over this. Pick a stance and stick with it; you're all over the place, sport.

Originally posted by Robtard
Now you're trying to confuse the point again. You said you'd whine if people didn't whine over this. Pick a stance and stick with it; you're all over the place, sport.

But I'm not trying to confuse the point. I said I wasn't being serious about that.

Do you understand the words I am typing?

Whether you believe it or not isn't what I'm asking, just tell me you grasp what I'm saying so we can move on.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay but you see when someone like you says this..you realize it's just the pot calling the kettle black, correct?

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, as in your stance changes post to post. You don't make any sense. Quit saying weird things and acting like you're making a point. You're making a fool out of yourself, repeatedly.

My stance didn't change though but...actually, you know what? You're a silly little troll lol. Everybody who comes across you thinks you're an absolute joke.

So there's not even a point trying to bring any semblance of logic into a discussion with you, it evaporates the moment you enter a thread.