Trump apparently is Time's person of the year.

Started by Robtard6 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
But I'm not trying to confuse the point. I said I wasn't being serious about that.

Do you understand the words I am typing?

Whether you believe it or not isn't what I'm asking, just tell me you grasp what I'm saying so we can move on.

That question has already been answered, see below, sport.

Originally posted by Robtard
So when your nonsense is pointed out you resort to "I was just kidding", good one, sport.

Do you understand the words that I typed? If so, why do you keep asking over and over when the answer has already been given? Is it to further confuse the point?

Yes I do, so do you have intelligence and do you understand the words I typed?

Just say yes or no, do you?

Originally posted by Surtur
My stance didn't change though but...actually, you know what? You're a silly little troll lol. Everybody who comes across you thinks you're an absolute joke.

So there's not even a point trying to bring any semblance of logic into a discussion with you, it evaporates the moment you enter a thread.

Dude, you always try to change the topic. The point is you are all over the map and don't make any sense. You again try to change the conversation mainly because you're unable to form a coherent thought.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yes I do, so do you have intelligence and do you understand the words I typed?

Just say yes or no, do you?

Hey look, you danced around enough trying to confuse away from the initial point and the page turned, sport. Kudos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dude, you always try to change the topic. The point is you are all over the map and don't make any sense. You again try to change the conversation mainly because you're unable to form a coherent thought.

The topic is Trump won Time magazine man of the year. When did I try to change that topic?

Quote me the exact post where I try to steer this topic away from Trumps being awarded the man of the year.

Originally posted by Robtard
Hey look, you danced around enough trying to confuse away from the initial point and the page turned, sport. Kudos.

Okay so I'm going to assume you do understand words and that you can read. You've seen my explanation(irrelevant if you believe it at this point), so..now back to the topic at hand, which is Trump being made person of the year.

Any comments on that?

Originally posted by Surtur
The topic is Trump won Time magazine man of the year. When did I try to change that topic?

Quote me the exact post where I try to steer this topic away from Trumps being awarded the man of the year.

See what I mean. I wonder what is wrong with you. Your brain doesn't seem to function and you think rambling on and asking weird questions is proving your point. You're a lost cause.

Originally posted by quanchi112
See what I mean. I wonder what is wrong with you. Your brain doesn't seem to function and you think rambling on and asking weird questions is proving your point. You're a lost cause.

Yeah that's what I thought troll, you have nothing to show me trying to steer this thread away from the topic.

Time for a toke, while I'm gone maybe quote me my post in this thread where I try to change the topic. Since this is my thread and the topic is Trumps time magazine thing, so..again: show me trying to prevent that from being discussed.

If your next response doesn't contain this evidence, I'll just take that as you admitting you're full of it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so I'm going to assume you do understand words and that you can read. You've seen my explanation(irrelevant if you believe it at this point), so..now back to the topic at hand, which is Trump being made person of the year.

Any comments on that?

What's there to say? As was already pointed out to you by Beni, myself and others on the first two pages, Trump deserved this win and for the reasons stated by Time Mag, but it's not really an accolade considering those reasons.

Do you finally understand that? A simple 'yes' or 'no' will suffice, no need to get long winded and try and confuse away from the topic/point again. Thanks.

Originally posted by Robtard
What's there to say? As was already pointed out to you by Beni, myself and others on the first two pages, Trump deserved this win and for the reasons stated by Time Mag, but it's not really an accolade considering those reasons.

Do you finally understand that? A simple 'yes' or 'no' will suffice, no need to get long winded and try and confuse away from the topic/point again. Thanks.

It's already been acknowledged a long time ago that this isn't an accolade.

So okie dokie, now that we've solved that issue..back to the topic.

Then you're welcome, I am glad I could help you understand the meaning of Time's POTY award. I'm sure if Beni were here, he'd feel the same in helping you.

Back? We are on the topic, even this post is on the topic. Are you trying to confuse the point again.

But you nor anyone else helped me understand it, because it's something I knew before I even posted this topic.

I have said that more than once in the thread as well, did you happen to miss all those posts or are you just ignoring them? You said you know what words mean, so surely you missed the posts.

Which is okay, sometimes threads move quickly and you miss things people say.

That is just not true, anyone who follows even the first two pages of the thread will see that you made this thread thinking that Trump being named Time's POTY was some sort of accolade and then only after it was pointed out that it necessarily isn't and definitely isn't in Trump's case for the reason's Time Mag noted, you've tried your best to confuse the point. At one point you even accused Beni of trying to smear Trump's win when all he did was point out the facts about what it can/does mean to win, sport.

Now, what else would you like to discuss on the topic? Trump won, it was deserved win; it's not an accolade in his case.

But it is true, since I never once said this was an accolade. The one thing I said was someone was trying to taint this, but I explained I wasn't saying it meant this said something good about Trump.

From the beginning I said I was laughing at the butthurt. There was nothing about accolades lol.

So yes, Trump won, it was deserved, it wasn't an accolade, and everyone was aware of that from the start.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah that's what I thought troll, you have nothing to show me trying to steer this thread away from the topic.

Time for a toke, while I'm gone maybe quote me my post in this thread where I try to change the topic. Since this is my thread and the topic is Trumps time magazine thing, so..again: show me trying to prevent that from being discussed.

If your next response doesn't contain this evidence, I'll just take that as you admitting you're full of it.

You went off on an irrelevant off topic point and you get called on it. Then you make weirded statements and try to change the topic off of where you just tried to steer it.

So you are someone who tries to alter their brain. Now it makes sense as to why you're such a mess.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You went off on an irrelevant off topic point and you get called on it. Then you make weirded statements and try to change the topic off of where you just tried to steer it.

So you are someone who tries to alter their brain. Now it makes sense as to why you're such a mess.

Except I didn't go off. I was laughing at this the entire time. Other people tried to steer it in the direction of "oh you didn't get it's not an accolade". Even though I never said it was.

So you've once again failed. Just stop. You do this in every thread you enter.

Originally posted by Surtur
Except I didn't go off. I was laughing at this the entire time. Other people tried to steer it in the direction of "oh you didn't get it's not an accolade". Even though I never said it was.

So you've once again failed. Just stop. You do this in every thread you enter.

More nonsense.

Originally posted by quanchi112
More nonsense.

A "pot kettle black" comment wouldn't even seem to do this one justice.

Originally posted by Surtur
But it is true, since I never once said this was an accolade. The one thing I said was someone was trying to taint this, but I explained I wasn't saying it meant this said something good about Trump.

From the beginning I said I was laughing at the butthurt. There was nothing about accolades lol.

So yes, Trump won, it was deserved, it wasn't an accolade, and everyone was aware of that from the start.

If you want to laugh at imagined butthurt, be my guest, what you do with your time is your own. But not a single poster here is butthurt that Trump won this; this is a fact. The people who you expected to be butthurt were the ones who explained what winning meant and think Trump deserved winning for reasons provided. So enjoy, sport.

Originally posted by Surtur
A "pot kettle black" comment wouldn't even seem to do this one justice.
Your brain isn't up to the task. I get it.