Firstly, the Tott feat was created before the Legends split and so obviously was never intended to be exaggerated and has nothing indicating that it ever was, unlike with the Tartakovsky materials which were established as such independantly from the aforementioned split.
Secondly, this is an EU forum and so we can safely move away from second-guessing every single Legends material or else we can all just pack up and leave.
Thirdly, there's no evidence that the Tott feat specifically is exaggerated. As I said, it was never intended to be so. It's stated quite clearly that 100% accuracy is just as likely as exaggeration. With no evidence of the latter we should take it as fact, for the reasons already stated: No evidence of exaggeration, no reason to second guess it, the concept of innocent until proven guilty and the presumption of wanting actual discourse. On the other hand, with the Tartakovsky materials there is evidence of exaggeration and so it can be safely dismissed as an overblown myth.
So in essence the only thing Tempest has provided is an official reason for my argument to dismiss the Rivi Anu feat while keeping the Tott one. 🙂
This applies to all other EU feats. With no evidence of exaggeration the only thing suggesting it would be personal bias. The statement Tempest provided is too vague to be properly applied to anything that doesn't have credible evidence to dismiss it anyway. With no way of telling that it should be applied to anything else (i.e. all of the EU) a presumption of innocence in the absence of evidence against it is the only intelligent response.
With arguments like that, it's hard to believe you're held in such contempt.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Firstly, the Tott feat was created before the Legends split and so obviously was never intended to be exaggerated and has nothing indicating that it ever was, unlike with the Tartakovsky materials which were established as such independantly from the aforementioned split.Secondly, this is an EU forum and so we can safely move away from second-guessing every single Legends material or else we can all just pack up and leave.
Thirdly, there's no evidence that the Tott feat specifically is exaggerated. As I said, it was never intended to be so. It's stated quite clearly that 100% accuracy is just as likely as exaggeration. With no evidence of the latter we should take it as fact, for the reasons already stated: No evidence of exaggeration, no reason to second guess it, the concept of innocent until proven guilty and the presumption of wanting actual discourse. On the other hand, with the Tartakovsky materials there [b]is
evidence of exaggeration and so it can be safely dismissed as an overblown myth.So in essence the only thing Tempest has provided is an official reason for my argument to dismiss the Rivi Anu feat while keeping the Tott one. 🙂
This applies to all other EU feats. With no evidence of exaggeration the only thing suggesting it would be personal bias. The statement Tempest provided is too vague to be properly applied to anything that doesn't have credible evidence to dismiss it anyway. With no way of telling that it should be applied to anything else (i.e. all of the EU) a presumption of innocence in the absence of evidence against it is the only intelligent response. [/B]
The microseries is indeed exaggerated... compared with canon. Because it's now under the Legends brand and therefore not canon at all, the point is moot.
Behold: I articulated the point in only 2 sentences. This will hopefully enable you to grasp it. 👆
Originally posted by Nephthys
Why cope when theres an easy solution that a true pal can readily provide?
Because from the looks of it, it's not just my words you struggle with. Trust me, I'd make you smarter if I could.
In the meantime, don't give up: I expect most other retards lack your self-awareness. Among the mentally handicapped, you're [Special] Olympian.
Originally posted by Nephthys
How boring, you couldn't keep up the witty banter and just went for crass insults. Oh well, I guess keeping it up was never your strong suit.
I see you've been triggered mmm
Whoops.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Perhaps you should return to your true passion of getting corndogged by Nai again? Just a suggestion, champ. Have fun. 😉
Strange that you feel the need to hide behind a person you once ranked beneath me rather than defend yourself here.
But your submission is gratifying. excellent