Why is Maul the weakest of Sidious's apprentices?

Started by Geistalt4 pages
Geistalt SilenceThatSpeaksVolumes

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not at all.

Kenobi bested Vader at his best and somehow you believe Vader is greater than Kenobi. In ANH Kenobi stopped fight back.

Maul has gotten the best of Kenobi whereas Vader never has when he didn't allow it.

RotJ Vader > RotS Vader

RotS Obi-Wan just barely outfought RotS Vader.

They were pretty evenly matched as of TCW (although everyone always argues that "Obi-Wan was unbalanced"😉.

It would be nice if Maul turned out to be stronger, tbh.

Shame his feats against Kanan and Ahsoka showed otherwise.

Darth Thor Senior Member

^ Anakin was the unbalanced one.

|King Joker| Your Excellency

Originally posted by Geistalt
Shame his feats against Kanan and Ahsoka showed otherwise.
Not really.

Geistalt SilenceThatSpeaksVolumes

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Anakin was the unbalanced one.
I meant the couple of times Obi-Wan fought Maul in TCW.

DarthDuelist9 Senior Member

Maul's potential was cut in half when he was 22 years old, then he proceeds to be useless for a dozen years until we meet him in TCW, compare that to Vader (the guy with the highest potential ever) and Dooku (someone who received training from Yoda and Sidious for 75 years) and you know the answer. The thing is, what Maul accomplished in TPM (age 22) is almost unpreceded in the entire mythos, that afterwards he didn't receive even a fraction of the training someone like Dooku or even Vader did can't really be hold against him.